BRCA1 - ETSU
Download
Report
Transcript BRCA1 - ETSU
Hereditary Cancer Syndromes:
Implications for Improved Medical
Management and Cancer Prevention
Debbie Pencarinha, M.S., C.G.C.
Licensed Genetic Counselor
Kingsport Hematology and Oncology
15th Annual Primary Care Conference
March 30, 2011
Objectives
Recognize who to refer
Review hereditary cancer syndromes
Discuss genetic testing available for pediatric and
adult cancer as well as genetic research opportunities
Provide the latest medical management
recommendations for cancer prevention and early
detection in carriers of a genetic predisposition for
cancer
Audience Demographics
1. Family practice
2. Internal medicine
3. Ob/gyn
4. Pediatrics
5. Specialist
6. Other
Personal Identification with
Cancer
1. Personal history of cancer
2. Personal and family history
3. One 1st or 2nd degree relative
st
nd
4. 2 or more 1 or 2 degree relatives
5. Distant or no family history of
cancer
Hereditary cancer genes can lead
to cancer risks as high as 100%!
BRCA1 or BRCA2 = 85%
MLH1/MSH2 = 80%
APC = 100%!!!
P53 = 90+ %
Percentage of Cancer that is Hereditary
1. 1-2%
2. 5-10%
3. 15-20%
4. 25-30%
Are cancer genes REALLY rare?
Tri-Cities population > 500,000
1 in 400 carry BRCA = 1,250
1 in 1000 carry Lynch syndrome = 500
1 in 5000 carry p53 = 100
“An ounce of prevention
is worth a pound of cure”
All cancer is genetic …
but not all cancer is hereditary!
Germline mutations
Parent
Mutation in
egg or
sperm
Somatic mutations
Child
All cells
affected in
offspring
Present in egg or sperm
Are heritable
Cause cancer family syndromes
Somatic mutation
(eg, breast)
Occur in nongermline tissues
Are nonheritable
ASCO
Mutations in Specific Genes are
Responsible for Hereditary Cancer Risk
MYH
MSH2
MSH6
MLH1
VHL
APC
PMS2
CDKN2A
RET
PTEN
BRCA2
CDH1
TP53
BRCA1
TP53
MLH1
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian
Cancer (HBOC)
•~
180,510 new cases in 2007
• ~10,614 due to a BRCA mutation
• ~22,430
new cases in 2007
• ~2,243 due to a BRCA mutation
15%-20%
5%–10%
5%–10%
Breast Cancer
Ovarian Cancer
Sporadic
Family clusters
Hereditary
Cancer Statistics, 2007, American Cancer Society
ASCO
Cancer Susceptibility Genes and DNA Repair
Endogenous DNA
damage
hydrolysis
Exogenous DNA
damage
ROS, RNS
UV rad.
ionizing rad.
4
Avg cell repairs 10 SSB
each day
Venkitaraman A. NEJM
2003;348:1917-1919
chemicals
BRCA1
Exon 2
17q12 (22 exons)
Tumor suppressor
Dominant Inheritance
Up to 87% risk for BC
Up to 44% risk for OC
Tumors tend to be
ER-, PR-, HER2-
185delAG
Low penetrance
Med. onset br=55y
Exon 11
Exon 13
4184delTCAA
Duplication
British mutation
Med. onset
br=41y
Med. onset br=47y
Refer women diagnosed <50 with triple negative breast cancer…
Chen Y, Lee WH et al., J Cell Physiol. 1999;181:385-92.
BRCA Mutation: Other Cancer Risks
Male Breast Cancer
Prostate
Pancreas
BRCA1
BRCA2
Increased
6%
16-30%
19-34%
2 to 3-fold increase
Melanoma
GI cancers:
Stomach, colon
Liede A, Karlan B, Narod S. JCO 2004;22(4):735-742
5%
< 5%
2-fold increase
No increase
Family with Hereditary Risk of
Breast and Ovarian Cancer
Cancer
Breast ca d.49
ovarian ca
dx 49; d. 52
breast ca
dx 38
36
45
43
28
57
At risk?
60
35
39
After Mutation is Identified, Risk of Individual Family
Members is Clarified
Cancer
Breast ca d.49
High risk
Population risk
ovarian ca
dx 49; d. 52
breast ca
dx 38
36
45
43
28
57
60
35
39
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
Syndrome
Red-flags (Individuals at increased risk for hereditary cancer)
Breast cancer before age 50
Ovarian cancer at any age
Bilateral breast cancer
Both breast cancer and ovarian cancer diagnosed in the same
individual
Male breast cancer
Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry
As more of these features are present in the family, the chance of
a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation increases
NCCN Guidelines: High Risk Screening
And Hereditary Breast/Ovarian
Women
BSE: Begin at age 18
CBE: Every 6 months
begin at age 25
Annual mammogram
& breast MRI: begin
age 25 (or individualized)
Consider
chemoprevention
Men
BSE education,
monthly BSE
CBE, semiannually
Baseline mammogram
• Annual if gynecomastia or
parenchymal/glandular
breast density on baseline
study
Strict adherence to
prostate cancer
screening
Sensitivity of Screenings
Mammography: detects 36% of cancers
Ultrasound: detects 33% of cancers
MRI: detects 77% of cancers
Sensitivity up to 95% with Mammography,
Ultrasound, MRI and clinical breast exam.
Sensitivity and specificity: dependent upon
radiologic experience and follow-up capabilities
Warner, et al, 2004. JAMA, 292(11):1317-1325.
Prophylactic Mastectomy
Total Mastectomy
95-99% removal of breast
tissue
Subcutaneous or nipple
sparing mastectomy
Thin skin flaps
2-3mm thick nipple-areolar
flap
Metcalfe KA et al., Lancet Oncol 2005; 6:431-4; Fatouros M. et al., Annals of Surg Oncol
2007;15(1)21-33
Risk Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy
risk of GYN and
breast cancer
Pathologic evaluation
of specimen after
BSO
2-10% BRCA carriers
have occult cancers
2-3mm interval
sections
Awareness of
spectrum of lesions
Kauff et al., Atlas Of Cancer, 2008; Weber et al., Zaloudek et al, Am J Surg Pathol 2009;33(8)1125-36
Impact on Mortality?
BRCA1
53%
BRCA2
71%
Absolute Survival Gain
BRCA1
Absolute Survival Gain
BRCA2
Mammo + MRI only
6%
4%
PM at age 25y
13%
8%
PM at 25y & PO at 40y
26%
12%
PM at age 40y
11%
7%
PO at age 40y
15%
6%
With no intervention survival
to age 70 =
Overall survival to age 70 in the general US population = 84%
Survival Analysis of Cancer Risk Reduction Strategies for BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers . Plevritis SK, et
al., JCO 2010;28(2):222-31.
Tamoxifen
First drug approved by FDA to reduce the risk of developing a cancer.
20 mg day for 5 years
Estimated that 2 million women in US could benefit from Tamoxifen
Risk reduction of up to 49% (NSABP P-1)
Common side effects:
Hot flashes
Vaginal discharge or vaginal dryness
Fluid retention
Fracture risk reduction
Lowering of cholesterol levels
Reduced incidence of benign breast disease and fewer biopsies
Rare: endometrial cancer, thromboembolic events, cataracts
Contraindications: history of DVT, PE, stroke, TIA, pregnancy
Fisher, et al, 1998. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 90(18):1371-1388.
PARP Inhibitors Hinder Alternative DNA Repair in BRCA Deficient Cells
Leading to Cell Death
© The Author
2010. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf
of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
Underhill C et al. Ann Oncol 2010;annonc.mdq322
Effects of delaying prevention on survival
6
Survival benefit in years
5
4
3
Tamoxifen
2
Oophorectomy
1
0
30
35
40
45
50
55
Age at initiating preventive measure
Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, M.B.,B.S.
University of Chicago Medical Center
60
Tamoxifen and
oophorectomy
Mastectomy
Mastectomy and
oophorectomy
Case I -- 32 yo female is diagnosed with
breast cancer after stereotactic biopsy. She
had a prior history of adrenocortical
carcinoma at age 2
Lumpectomy and radiation vs.
mastectomy if genetic test was positive
“No other history of breast or ovarian
cancer but there are lots of relatives with cancer”
Patient did not want chemotherapy, strongly desired to
have a child with her new partner
Li-Fraumeni Syndrome:
Incidence—1/5000
Breast cancer (early-onset 25.5%)
Soft tissue sarcoma (14.3%)
Adrenocortical carcinoma (13.1%)
Brain tumor (11.9%)
Osteosarcoma (11.0%)
Hematological (3.4%)
Other: melanoma, colon, pancreatic, lung, stomach,
ovarian, head and neck, renal
Petitjean, et al (2007) Hum Mutat
LFS Cancer Risks
Cancer risk by age:
50% by age 30 (vs. 1% pop risk)
90% by age 70
Age-specific cancer risk:
42% from 0-16 years
38% from 17-45 years
63% after age 45
Lifetime risk of cancer:
90%- 100% for women
70% for men
Available surveillance guidelines for LFS:
are these sufficient?
• Recommended surveillance for children
– Annual physical examination, CBC, urinalysis
– Annual abdominal ultrasound
– Additional organ based screening depending on family history
• Recommended surveillance for adults
– Annual physical examination (with skin and neuro evaluation)
– Annual CBC, urinalysis
– For women: clinical breast exam q6 months at 20-25 yrs
– For women: annual mammogram at 20-25 yrs
– Consideration of annual rapid full body MRI or PET scan—NEW
(found ca in 20% of asymptomatic carriers when screening--soon to be
published by Schiffman et. al.)
Slide Courtesy of Kowalski --CHOP
http://www.nccn.org http://www.genetests.org
Radiation exposure and cancer risk in LFS
patients has been documented:
Heyn R, et al. Second malignant neoplasms in children treated for
rhabdomyosarcoma. Intergroup Rhabdomuyosarcoma Study
Committee. J Clin Oncol 1993
Several cases of soft tissue sarcoma occurred in previous
radiotherapy fields
Hisada M, et al. Multiple Primary Cancer in Families with LiFraumeni Syndrome. J Natl Cancer Instit. 1998
Radiotherapy led to 8 subsequent solid tumors in six patients
and one patient with acute leukemia
Salmon A, et al. Rapid Development of Post-radiotherapy Sarcoma
and Breast Cancer in a Patient with a Novel Germline ‘De-Novo’
TP53 Mutation. Clinical Oncology 2007.
Case report of a LFS patient who developed a second and third
primary in the irradiation field.
Case Report II
A 58-year old male is diagnosed with three
separate primary colon cancers.
He has a partial colectomy.
He is referred to genetics for testing despite a
negative family history.
He tests positive for Lynch syndrome.
Clinical Features of Lynch Syndrome
(Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer)
Early but variable age at CRC diagnosis (~45 years)- ~ 80%
Lifetime risk for cancer: 90% --males, 70%-females
Tumor site in proximal colon predominates
Extracolonic cancers:
endometrium - Up to 60% risk
ovary – 9-12% risk
stomach – 11-19% risk
urinary tract – 4-5% risk
small bowel – 1-4%
bile ducts – 2-7%
brain/CNS – 1-3%
Colonoscopy Improves Survival of GeneticallyConfirmed Lynch Syndrome
Surveillance
No surveillance
Survival
100
92.2%
80
73.9%
60
40
0
5
10
15
Follow-up time (years)
Gastroenterology 2000;118:829-34
NCCN guidelines for management of
Lynch Syndrome (version 1.2011--10/4/10)
Colonoscopy beginning at 20-25, every 1-2 years
Consider prophylactic TAH-BSO after childbearing
Educate re: prompt response to endometrial ca
symptoms
Annual endometrial sampling may be appropriate in
select patients
Transvaginal u/s may be considered
NCCN guidelines (cont.)
Consider EGD with extended duodenoscopy and polypectomy
every 2-3 yrs. at age 30-35.
Preliminary data suggests baseline gastric biopsies
Consider capsule endoscopy for small bowel cancer every 2-3 yrs
beginning at 30-35.
Consider annual urinalysis.
Annual physical exam with a high index of suspicion for
associated cancers.
Accumulating evidence for “anticipation” in Lynch syndrome families…
Hereditary Susceptibility to CRC
Sporadic
(65%–85%)
Familial
(10%–30%)
Rare CRC
syndromes
(<0.1%)
Lynch Syndrome (aka
Hereditary nonpolyposis
colorectal cancer) (5%)
Familial adenomatous polyposis
(FAP) (1%)
Adapted from Burt RW et al. Prevention and Early Detection of CRC, 1996
ASCO
Clinical Characteristics of Classic
Familial Adenomatous Polyposis (FAP)
Clinically defined as:
• at least 100 adenomatous polyps
• often thousands of polyps
• present throughout the colon
• with early age of onset
~16 yrs, range 8-34 yrs
autosomal dominant
near 100% penetrance
20-30% de novo mutation rate1
(eg., no prior family history)
1Bisgaard,
Hum Mutation 1994; 3:121-125
Pediatric Management of FAP
Endoscopic Surveillance or Management
Infancy to 5 years (for known mutation carriers)
• Twice yearly physical exam & serum AFP
• Annual abdominal ultrasound (hepatoblastoma)
Childhood
• Evaluation of GI symptoms (changes in stool
number/consistency, mucous or blood, abdominal/back
pain) (?early indicators of CRC)
10-12 Years
• Genetic counseling
• First screening colonoscopy (adenoma development)
Vasen HF, et al. GUT 2008, Aretz S, Dtsch Arztebl Int 2010, www.NCCN.org V.I.2010
Other Cancer Risks and Management for
Older Individuals with FAP
•UpperGI malignancies --duodenal ampullary carcinomas, gastric ca
Screening: EGD every 1-3 years
•Non-intestinal cancers = HB (1-2%), desmoid tumors (10-20%),
pancreatic ca (2%), thyroid ca (1-2%), medulloblastoma (1-2%),
benign adrenal adenomas or other adrenal masses (7-13%)
Screening: periodic EUS (no data), annual thyroid exam
• Colorectal
polyps and cancer
Screening: Sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy q 1-2 years, starting at 10 12 yrs or 10 years before earliest cancer diagnosis in the family
• Total
Colectomy after initial polyps are identified
EJ Groen et al. Annals of Surgical Oncology 2008; 15(9):2439-2450
Attenuated FAP (AFAP)
Fewer polyps than classic FAP
Cancer risk approaches 80-100%
~20-100 colon polyps
Polyps generally begin at an older age (~44)
generally right-sided colon polyps
later colorectal cancer onset (~50 yr)
Extra-intestinal manifestations may be present
Colorectal Cancer in FAP
is Inevitable without Intervention
Probability of cancer (%)
100
FAP
HNPCC
Population Risk
30
Age (Years)
50
70
Bussey, Familial Polyposis Coli 1975
Petersen, Gastroenterology 1991; 100:1658
Risk Factors for Renal Cancer
Male:Female (2:1)
Non-hereditary factors
smoking
end stage renal disease (30X)
cystic diseases of the kidney
hypertension
analgesic use
Hereditary (~4-5% of all cases)
Multiple tumors
Bilateral disease
Young age at onset
Hereditary Renal Cancer Syndromes
Syndrome
Gene / Locus
von Hippel-Lindau (VHL)
VHL / 3p26-p25
Familial Non-VHL clear cell RCC
Hereditary Papillary Renal Carcinoma (HPRCC)
Chromosome 3
translocations-all different
c-MET / 7q31.1-34
Birt Hogg Dube (BHD)
FLCN / 17p11.2
Hereditary Leiomyomatosis & Renal Cell
Carcinoma (HLRCC)
? Familial Renal Oncocytoma (FRO)
FH / 1q42.1
? Low Penetrant susceptibility genes
VHL Clinical Manifestations & Incidence
Retinal
45-60%
Angioma
Endolymphatic
sac tumor 10%
Pancreatic
cysts 90%;
islet cell
tumors;
cystadenomas
Epididymal
cystadenomas
20-26%
Slide from Lindsay Middelton, RN, CGC; Urology Oncology Branch, NCI
Cerebellar HB
65%
Spine HB
13-60%
Pheochromocytoma
15%
Clear cell renal
cancer 35% - 45%
Cysts 60-80%
Broad Ligament
cystadenomas
VHL: CNS Hemangioblastoma
(benign)
Slide from Lindsay Middelton, RN, CGC; Urology Oncology Branch, NCI
Birt-Hogg-Dube (BHD): Fibrofolliculomas
Benign tumor
hair follicle
Frequency ~84%
Distribution
primarily face &
neck
Slide from Lindsay Middelton, RN, CGC; Urology Oncology Branch, NCI
BHD: Pulmonary Cysts
84% one or more
pulmonary cyst
38% history of
pneumothorax
Can be recurrent
Bilateral
Slide from Lindsay Middelton, RN, CGC; Urology Oncology Branch, NCI
Preventative Measures for
Mutation Carriers– MEN2A, 2B
Screen for pheochromocytoma first!
Total Thyroidectomy
< 6 yo for MEN2A
At birth for MEN2B
The Genetic Influence on
Prostate Cancer Risk
Genome-wide Association Studies
and Prostate Cancer
Prostate
cancer has the largest number of susceptibility
loci identified of any cancer to date
At
least 25 SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms) are
commercially available
Limitations of SNP testing
Panel applies only to Caucasians
Other risk factors not included in calculation
Does not account for HPC or other genetic risk
• Potential for false reassurance
New technology
• Validity, clinical utility
There are no standard SNP panels
No consensus guidelines for medical management
Hereditary Prostate Cancer
(Hopkins Criteria)
At least one of the following:
1.
Three or more first degree relatives
2.
Three successive generations on one side of the family
3.
At least two relatives affected at age 55 or younger
(Carter –1993 J. Urol.)
Putative HPC Genes
HPC1/RNASEL (1q24-p25)
Associated with younger and more aggressive HPC (inconsistent results)
HPC2/ELAC2 (17p11)
2 missense mutations identified (linkage not replicated elsewhere)
MSR1 (8p22-p23)
Associated with later onset HPC (confirmed in some but not all studies)
PCAP (1q42.2-q43)
Linked to early onset PC (not confirmed by most studies)
HPCX (Xq27-q28)
X-linked HPC (conflicting data)
HPC20 (20q13)
Associated with PC in men over 65; less than 5 affected men/family, no male to male
transmission (conflicting data)
CAPB (1p36)
Linked to prostate and brain cancer in 12 families (inconsistent results)
Finasteride
New guidelines:
Healthy men with PSA of 3.0 or lower should consider taking a 5-alpha
reductase inhibitor (Finasteride) to prevent prostate cancer
American Urological Association
American Society of Clinical Oncologists
Applies to men who plan to get yearly PSA or regular prostate cancer screenings and
have no signs of prostate cancer
Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial found an overall 25% relative risk
reduction for prostate cancer in men who took Finasteride for 1-7 years
Reduction of about 50% in PSA by 12 months expected
Decision aid tool: www.asco.org/guidelines
Patient guide: www.cancer.net
Kramer, et al. (2009). (http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.16.9599)
X Germ cell & trophoblastic
tumors & neoplasms of
gonads
3%
XI Other malignant
epithelial neoplasms and
melanomas
4%
XII Other and unspecified
malignant neoplasms
0%
Pediatric Cancers
Ages 0-14
Not classified by ICCC
0%
IX Soft tissue and other
extraosseous sarcomas
7%
Leukemia
(includes MDS)
31%
VIII Malignant bone tumors
4%
VII Hepatic tumors
2%
VI Renal tumors
5%
V Retinoblastoma
3%
IV Neuroblastoma and
other peripheral nervous
cell tumor
6%
III CNS and misc
intracranial and intraspinal
neoplasms (2004+ only)
25%
Lymphomas and
reticuloendothelial
neoplasms
10%
Age-Adjusted and Age-Specific SEER Cancer Incidence
Rates, 2003-2007
Pediatric Cancers that Merit
Genetics Referral
Retinoblastoma (RB1)
Bilateral Wilms Tumor (WT1)
Adrenocortical carcinoma (p53)
Choroid Plexus Tumor (p53)
Rhabdomyosarcoma < 3 yo (p53)
Osteosarcoma < 10 yo (p53)
Medullary thyroid cancer (RET)
Hepatoblastoma (APC)
Pediatric Cancers
for Genetics Referral (cont.)
Pheochromocytoma / paraganglioma (VHL, NF1,
RET,SDHB, SDHC, SDHD)
Retinal/cerebellar hemangioblastoma (VHL)
Endolymphatic sac tumors (VHL)
Optic pathway tumor (NF1)
Acoustic or vestibular schwannomas (NF2)
Atypical teratoid and malignant rhabdoid tumor
(INI1/SNF5)
Cancer risk and screening in
hereditary retinoblastoma (RB)
• 40% of RB patients have hereditary disease
• Due to germline mutations in RB1 gene (13q14)
• 0.5 - 15% develop intracranial tumors
• Increased life-long risk of second cancers
– Bone, soft tissue sarcomas
– Brain, nasal cavity cancer
– Melanoma, lung, GI, bladder
– Commonly in irradiated sites
C-L Yu et al. JNCI 2009; 101:581-591.
R Kleinerman et al. JCO 2005; 23:2272-2279.
C Eng et al. JNCI
1993; 85:1121-1128.
Idiopathic hemihypertrophy (BeckwithWiedemann syndrome) and associated cancer risks
•Overgrowth syndromes most commonly due to defects
in methylation of genes at 11p15
•7-14% risk of developing embryonal tumors
Wilms tumor, hepatoblastoma (2:1 ratio)
Adrenocortical carcinoma
Case reports of neuroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma
• Screening:
Abd U/S q 3 months until age 4 yrs
Serum AFP q 6-12 weeks until 4 yrs
At 4 yrs, renal U/S until age 8-10 yrs
Leukemias/Lymphomas
Not typically hereditary
Risk for 1st and 2nd degree relatives (1.5-4.5%)
RARE families have a hematologic malignancy
syndrome
Higher risk for leukemia can be seen with other
genetic syndromes
Genetics Challenge #1
Which patient does NOT need a genetics referral?
1. Male with breast cancer diagnosed at age 55
2. Twenty-year-old with medullary thyroid carcinoma
3. Sixty-year-old female with a sister diagnosed with
breast cancer at age 55. No other family history.
4. Fifty-year-old male diagnosed with colon cancer with
no family history
Genetics Challenge #2
A patient tells you that her mother carries a BRCA
mutation. She has not been tested. What is her
approximate risk for breast cancer?
1.
2.
3.
4.
50%
50% x 87% = 45%
100%
25% x 87% = 22%
Last Challenge
Choose the FALSE statement:
1. Skin lesions are as important as cancer in making
some genetic diagnoses
2. BRCA mutations can be associated with Fanconi
anemia
3. Breast cancer is not inherited from the father
4. Do genetic testing on the person with cancer first
HOW DO WE IDENTIFY INDIVIDUALS
AT RISK?
Early diagnosis of cancer
Bilateral or multiple primaries of the same type
Two different, associated primary cancers (breast and
ovarian, colon and endometrial, medullary thyroid and
pheochromocytoma)
FAMILY HISTORY
Rare cancer—male breast ca, sarcoma, ACC
Polyposis
Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act
(GINA)
Signed May 21, 2008
Many have concerns about
potential adverse effects to
employability and health
insurability
Protects individuals from genetic
information discrimination in
health insurance and employment
BOTTOM LINE
KNOWLEDGE IS POWER
GENETIC DIAGNOSIS ALLOWS FOR:
Earlier, more frequent, most appropriate screening for cancer
Surgical options for cancer prevention
Chemoprevention
Research opportunities
Information for family members
Avoidance of unnecessary screening and anxiety
Genetic Testing is here to stay
Where should you go for information?
www.genetests.org
NCCN Guidelines™ &
Clinical Resources
http://www.nccn.org/index.asp
Genetics Home Reference
http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/
Thank You!
Debbie Pencarinha, M.S., CGC
Genetic Counselor
Kingsport Hematology and Oncology
423-224-3736