Transcript Diapositiva 1

EUROCHIP 3
WP1
Status of the project
17 September 2010
Sofia, Bulgaria
EUROCHIP-3 PLAN
4 MAIN WORK PACKAGES
Ahti Anttila
Renée Otter
Piret Veerus
Adherence to cervical screening in 5
Eastern EU countries
Population-based CR indicators:
dissemination and promotion
Cancer rehabilitation indicators
Andrea Micheli Cutting costs of cancer control
+ 3 HORIZONTAL WORK PACKAGES
coordination (A. Micheli),
evaluation (Z. Valerianova),
dissemination (A. Costa)
EUROCHIP-3: ORGANISATION CHANGES
Steering Committee
Working Team WP-Coordination
WP-Evaluation
NGS
NGS
NGS
NGS
WP
Screening
NGS
WP
Registration
DGS
WP
Rehabilitation
WP
Costs
DGS
WP-Dissemination
WP: Work package
NGS: National Group of Specialists
DGS: Domain Group of Specialists (European coverage)
Panel of Experts
DGS
DGS
WP1 deliverables
• Administration and management
• Preparation of material for the EUROCHIP
website dissemination
• Interim reports to the EC at month 18
• Final report sent to EC at month 38
• Specific reports to be prepared for the European
Commission and/or for the Network of
Competent Authorities on specific issues
discussed in the EUROCHIP forum
WP1 activities
Date
Place
Aims
26/09/2008
Tallinn
EUROCHIP-3 WP-4 and WP-6 activity coordination
31/10/2008
Milan
EUROCHIP-3 Steering Committee meeting
20/01/2009
Sofia
EUROCHIP-3 WP-4 activity discussion
10/03/2009
Amsterdam
EUROCHIP-3 WP-5 activity discussion
19/03/2009
Bruxelles
“European Partnership Action Against Cancer”
29/05/2009
Costantia
EUROCHIP-3 WP-4 dissemination
06/08/2009
Phone call
EUROCHIP-3 WP-2 activity coordination
29/09/2009
Bruxelles
“European Partnership Action Against Cancer”
26/10/2009
Phone call
Discussion on Cernobbio’s meeting with WP-2
08-11/11/09 Cernobbio
3rd International Cancer Control Congress
08/11/2009
Cernobbio
EUROCHIP-3 WP-4 and WP-2 coordination
11/11/2009
Cernobbio
EUROCHIP-3 WP-6 activity discussion
08/12/2009
Bruxelles
“European Partnership Action Against Cancer”
28/01/2010
Luxembourg
“European Partnership Action Against Cancer”
16/03/2010
Rome
EUROCHIP-3 WP-7 activity discussion
WP2 deliverables
• Dissemination throughout EUROCHIP
website
• Monograph and/or series of papers in
scientific journals on EUROCHIP3 result
• News flash can be disseminated in 5
Eastern European MS for WP4 activities
• Panel of Experts meeting to disseminate
EUROCHIP3 results to the EUROCHIP
network
In short, we propose
• Two or three Cancer World articles
• Five media packs tailored to each
country
• One media training day for everyone
• A guide to working with the media in
cervical cancer screening
• Advice and help with specific
dissemination projects
Press packs
• Aim to inform journalists and
stimulate them to pose relevant
questions to the relevant people
• Present key information, graphs
and images
• Published electronically in the
local language/languages
Media training day
A hands-on training day
for WP4 participants
• Which media for which
target audiences?
• Getting their attention:
writing press releases, finding news
‘hooks’, organising press events
• Clarifying key messages targeted at the
audience
• Delivering the message: conducting press,
radio and TV interviews
• Building long-term relationships
WP4 deliverables
• Publication of EUROCHIP-2 study results
• Study protocol on adherence to cervical
screening in 5 Eastern EU MS
• Result of studies on adherence to cervical
screening in 5 Eastern EU MS
• WP4 to be strictly connected with WP2 on
dissemination
SUMMARY - BULGARIA
• National campaign (related with EUROCHIP-3 adherence
study) not yet started
• Without this campaign study should be rewiewed
• We suggest
• To prepare an alternative protocol for 15th August
• To share it with EUROCHIP (Ahti/Milan group) but also
with your Bulgarian partners because probably this will
have organizational and economic implications (about
EUROCHIP funds)
• If the campaign will not start before 15th September the
EUROCHIP study will follow the new protocol
SUMMARY - LATVIA
• Study designed to reach doctors
• Today after meeting discussion with Paolo on destination of
17600 euro available in EUROCHIP
• Data collection closure for April 2011
• Analysis closure for August 2011
SUMMARY - ESTONIA
• Study started
• All questionnaire sent
• Up to now 26% of respondent
• Project in time for reporting results to EUROCHIP and to
ESO
SUMMARY - LITHUANIA
• Study designed aimed to evaluate the role of centralized
invitation system
• Is realistic that deadline of analysis is september 2011? YES
• Discussion after meeting with Paolo on the destination of
17600 euro availble in EUROCHIP
SUMMARY - ROMANIA
• To evaluate the possibility to perform a study
• Ahti will call Florian
WP5 deliverables
• Continuation of CR promotion in countries
without CRs
• EUROCHIP qualitative questionnaire
• Report on cancer registry indicators in
various countries
• WP5 to be strictly connected with WP2 on
dissemination
Description of WP5
•
Continuation of population-based CR promotion
o
o
•
in countries of the EU without PBCRs (Lux, Greece)
Promotion to make the PBCRs national wide in those
countries were only some regions are covered (France,
Italy, Spain, Germany..)
Inventory (Questionnaire) among the PBCRs on
o
o
o
o
available or collectable (also time delay) EUROCHIP
indicators
whether they are find to be useful
The linkage possibilities between which databanks
(mortality, hospital discharge…)
Promote the outcomes on different subjects: primary
prevention, screening, clinical items (delay of treatment,
treatment according to GLs..)
Description of WP5
• Greece
A training programme was formed by Mrs Margery Duin,
with specific aim to assist in the development of a Cancer
Registry (CR) in Greece.
• Luxembourg
WP-5 members are in contact with the Ministry of Health in
Luxembourg to provide support in the decision making
processes necessary for the activation of a National
Population based Cancer Registry in Luxembourg
• Qualitative questionnaire
Questionnaire developed in collaboration with ENCR and
the EUROCOURSE project. It should be sent to European
CRs after interim reports
WP6 Background
EUROCHIP-1 (2000-2002)
Organized more than 20 meetings with participation of
more than 120 cancer specialists
a) During these meetings a preliminary list of 158 cancer
indicators was progressively discussed up to produce a
list of 31 cancer indicators
b) Now some of these indicators are in the ECHI list and
should be collected in the same way in all EU countries
c) EUROCHIP-1 cancer indicator list did not include any
indicator on cancer rehabilitation
PRIORITY INDICATORS
INCLUSION
PRIORITY
INDICATOR
PREVALENCE
YES
HIGH
DEFINED
% OF RELAPSE
NO
FUNDING FOR REHAB
YES
HIGH
TBD
STRATEGY ON REHAB
YES
HIGH
TBS
GUIDELINE FOR REHAB
YES
HIGH
TBS
FOLLOW-UP
NO
CHANGED
MEDIUM
TBS
HOMECARE
YES
HIGH
TBS
TRAINING
YES
HIGH
TBD
CHANGED
MEDIUM
TBS
HIGH
TBD
NGO DEVOTED TO REHAB
COUNSELLING
RETURN TO WORK
NO
QoL
YES
TBD: TO BE DEFINED – TBS: TO BE SPECIFIED
WP7 Deliverables
• List of cancer control items where
innovation intervention to reduce costs is
possible (for a childhood cancer and
female breast cancer).
• Definition of cancer managing actions to
cut costs while maintaining outcomes
reductions.
• WP7 to be strictly connected with WP2 on
dissemination.