Transcript GovtActions

CHAPTER CHECKLIST
When you have completed your study of this
chapter, you will be able to
1
Explain how a rent ceiling creates a housing
shortage, inefficiency, and unfairness.
2
Explain how the minimum wage creates
unemployment, inefficiency, and unfairness.
3
Explain how production quotas create inefficiency
and unfairness.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
A Rent Ceiling
Rent ceiling
A government regulation that makes it illegal to charge
more than a specified rent for housing.
Price ceiling
The highest price at which it is legal to trade a particular
good, service, or factor of production. A rent ceiling is an
example of a price ceiling.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
Figure 7.1 shows a housing
market.
The demand for and supply
of housing determine the
equilibrium rent of $550 a
month and the equilibrium
quantity of 4,000 units of
housing.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
Figure 7.2 shows how a rent
ceiling creates a shortage.
A rent ceiling is imposed below
the equilibrium rent at $400 a
month.
1. The quantity of housing
supplied decreases to 3,000
units.
2. The quantity of housing
demanded increases to 6,000
units.
3. A shortage of 3,000 units arises.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
When a rent ceiling creates a housing shortage, two
developments occur:
• A black market
• Increased search activity
Black market
An illegal market that operates alongside a governmentregulated market.
Search activity
The time spent looking for someone with whom to do
business.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
Figure 7.3 shows how a rent
ceiling creates a black market
and housing search.
With a rent ceiling of $400 a
month:
1. 3,000 units of housing are
available.
2. Someone is willing to pay
$625 a month for the
3,000th unit of housing.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
3. Black market rents might
be as high as $625 a
month and resources get
used up in costly search
activity.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
 Are Rent Ceilings Efficient?
With a rent ceiling, the outcome is inefficient.
Marginal benefit exceeds marginal cost.
Producer surplus and consumer surplus shrink, and a
deadweight loss arises.
People who can’t find housing and landlords who can’t
offer housing at a lower rent lose.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
Figure 7.4(a) shows an
efficient housing market.
1. The market is efficient
with marginal benefit
equal to marginal cost.
2. Consumer surplus and
producer surplus are as
large as possible.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
Figure 7.4(b) shows the
inefficiency of a rent ceiling.
1. A rent ceiling restricts the
quantity supplied and
marginal benefit exceeds
marginal cost.
2. Consumer surplus (green
area) and producer
surplus (blue area) shrink
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
3. A deadweight loss arises.
4. Other resources are lost in
search activity and
evading and enforcing the
rent ceiling law .
Resource use is inefficient.
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
Are Rent Ceilings Fair?
Are the rules fair?
Are the results fair?
Does blocking rent adjustments avoid scarcity?
What mechanisms allocate resources when prices don’t
do the job?
Are those non-price mechanisms fair?
7.1 PRICE CEILINGS
If Rent Ceilings Are So Bad,Why Do We Have
Them?
Current renters gain and lobby politicians.
More renters than landlords, so rent ceilings can tip an
election.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
The labor market influences
employment opportunities
and wage rates.
Figure 7.5 shows a market for
fast-food servers
The demand for and supply of
fast-food servers determine the
equilibrium wage rate of $5 an
hour and the equilibrium
quantity of 5,000 servers
employed.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
The Minimum Wage
Minimum wage law
A government regulation that makes hiring labor for less
than a specified wage illegal.
Price floor
The lowest price at which it is legal to trade a particular
good, service, or factor of production. The minimum
wage is an example of a price floor.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
Figure 7.6 shows how a
minimum wage creates
unemployment.
A minimum wage is introduced at
$7 an hour.
1. The quantity of labor demanded
decreases to 3,000 workers.
2. The quantity of labor supplied
increases to 7,000 people.
3. 4,000 people are unemployed.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
Figure 7.7 shows how a
minimum wage increases job
search.
1. At the minimum wage rate
of $7 an hour, 3,000 jobs
are available.
2. Someone is willing to take the
3,000th job for $3 an hour.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
3. Illegal wage rates might
range from just below $7
an hour to $3 an hour.
People are willing to spend
time on job search that is
worth the equivalent of
lowering their wage rate by
$4 an hour.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
Is the Minimum Wage Efficient?
The firms’ surplus and workers’ surplus shrink, and a
deadweight loss arises.
Firms that cut back employment and by people who
can’t find jobs at the higher wage rate lose.
The total loss exceeds the deadweight loss because
resources get used in costly job-search activity.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
Figure 7.8(a) shows an
efficient labor market.
1. At the market equilibrium,
the marginal benefit of
labor to firms equals the
marginal cost of working.
2. The firms’ and workers’
surpluses are as large as
possible.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
Figure 7.8(b) shows an
inefficient labor market with
a minimum wage.
1. The minimum wage
restricts the quantity
demanded.
2. The firms’ surplus and the
workers’ surplus shrinks.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
3. A deadweight loss arises.
4. Other resources are used
up in job search activity
The outcome is inefficient.
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
Is the Minimum Wage Fair?
Is the rule fair?
Is the result fair?
If the wage rate doesn’t allocate labor, what does?
Are non-wage allocation mechanisms fair?
7.2 PRICE FLOORS
If the Minimum Wage Is So Bad,Why Do We
Have It?
The effects of minimum wage on employment might be
small.
What would make the effects on employment small?
Labor unions might lobby for a minimum wage: why?
7.3 PRODUCTION QUOTAS
A Production Quota
Production quota
An upper limit to the quantity of a good that may be
produced in a specified time period.
7.3 PRODUCTION QUOTAS
Figure 7.9 shows a market
for sugar beets.
1. With no government
intervention, the market is
in equilibrium where the
quantity demanded equals
the quantity supplied.
2. The equilibrium price is
$30 a ton and
3. the equilibrium quantity is
60 million tons a year
7.3 PRODUCTION QUOTAS
Figure 7.10 shows the
effects of a production quota
set below the equilibrium
quantity at 40 million tons a
year.
1. The price rises, and …
2. marginal cost falls.
7.3 PRODUCTION QUOTAS
Is a Production Quota Efficient or Fair?
A production quota is inefficient.
It results in a quantity at which marginal benefit exceeds
marginal cost so that a deadweight loss arises.
Whether a quota is fair depends on a lot of details about
the incomes and economic status of producers and
consumers.
The general presumption is that the producer gains an
unfair advantage and the consumer is unfairly penalized.
7.3 PRODUCTION QUOTAS
Figure 7.11 shows the
inefficiency of a production
quota.
Without a quota,
1. The market equilibrium is
efficient and the sum of
2. consumer surplus and
3. producer surplus is
maximized.
7.3 PRODUCTION QUOTAS
With a quota,
1. The quantity decreases.
2. Consumer surplus shrinks.
3. Producer surplus expands.
4. A deadweight loss arises.