opportunity cost
Download
Report
Transcript opportunity cost
Chapter 1
Economic Models
© 2006 Thomson Learning/South-Western
Economics
Economics
How societies allocate scarce resources
among alternative uses—three
questions:
What to produce
How much to produce
Who gets the physical and monetary
proceeds
2
MICROECONOMICS
3
How individuals and firms make
economic choices among scarce
resources
How these choices create markets
Production Possibility Frontier
Graph showing all possible combinations
of goods produced with fixed resources
Figure 1-1 shows production possibility
frontier--food and clothing produced per
week
4
At point A, society can produce 10 units of
food and 3 units of clothing
FIGURE 1-1: Production
Possibility Frontier
Amount of
food
per week—
lbs.
10
A
B
4
0
5
3
Amount of clothing
12
per week—articles of clothing
Production Possibility Frontier
At B, society can choose to produce 4 lbs.
of food and 12 articles of clothing.
Without more resources, points outside
production possibilities frontier are
unattainable
6
Resources are scarce; we must choose
among what we have to work with.
Production Possibility Frontier
Simple model illustrates five principles
common to microeconomic situations:
Scarce Resources
Scarcity expressed as Opportunity costs
Rising Opportunity Costs
Importance of Incentives
Inefficiency costs real resources
7
Scarcity And Opportunity Costs
Opportunity cost:
Cost of a good as measured by
goods or services that could
have been produced using those
scarce resources
8
Opportunity Cost Example
9
Figure 1-1: if economy produces one more
article of clothing beyond 10 at point A,
economy can only produce 9.5 lbs. of
food, given scarce resources.
Tradeoff (or OPPORTUNITY COST) at pt.
A: ½ lb food for each article of clothing.
FIGURE 1-1: Production Possibility Frontier
Amount of
food per
week (lbs.)
Opportunity cost of
clothing = ½ pound of food
10
9.5
0
10
A
3 4
Amount of clothing per
week (articles)
Rising Opportunity Costs
Fig.1-1 also shows that opportunity cost
of clothing rises so that it is much higher
at point B (1 unit of clothing costs 2 lbs.
of food).
Opportunity costs of economic action
not constant, but vary along PPF
11
FIGURE 1-1: Production Possibility Frontier
Amount
of food
per week
10
9.5
Opportunity cost of
clothing = ½ pound of food
A
Opportunity cost of
clothing = 2 pounds
of food
B
4
2
0
12
3 4
1213
Amount
of clothing
per week
Uses of Microeconomics
Uses of microeconomic analysis vary. One
useful way to categorize: by user type:
13
Individuals making decisions regarding jobs,
purchases, and finances;
Businesses making decisions regarding product
demand or production costs, or
Governments making policy decisions about
economic effects of various proposed or existing
laws and regulations.
Basic Supply-Demand Model
14
Model describes how sellers’ and buyers’
behavior determines good’s price
Economists hold that market behavior
generally explained by relationship
between buyers’ preferences for a good
(demand) and firms’ costs involved in
bringing that good to market (supply).
Adam Smith--The Invisible Hand
15
Adam Smith (1723-1790) saw prices as
force that directed resources into activities
where resources were most valuable.
Prices told both consumers and firms the
“worth” of goods.
David Ricardo--Diminishing Returns
David Ricardo (1772-1823) believed that
labor and other costs would rise with
production level
16
As new, less fertile, land was cultivated,
farming would require more labor for same
yield
Increasing cost argument: now referred to
as the Law of Diminishing Returns
FIGURE 1-2: Early Views of Price
Determination
Price
Price
P2
P*
P1
Quantity per week
(a) Smith
’
model
17
Q1
Q2 Quantity per week
(b) Ricardo model
’
Marshall’s Model of Supply and Demand
18
Ricardo’s model could not explain fall in
relative good prices during nineteenth
century (industrialization), so economists
needed a more general model.
Economists argued that people’s
willingness to pay for a good will decline
as they have more of that good—the
beginnings of thinking at the margin.
Marshall, Supply and Demand, and the Margin
19
People willing to consume more of good
only if price drops.
Focus of model: on value of last, or
marginal, unit purchased
Alfred Marshall (1842-1924) showed how
forces of demand and supply
simultaneously determined price.
Marshall, Supply and Demand, and the Margin
Figure 1-3: amount of good purchased per
period shown on the horizontal axis; price
of good appears on vertical axis.
Demand curve shows amount of good
people want to buy at each price. Negative
slope reflects marginalist principle.
20
Marshall, Supply and Demand, and the Margin
21
Upward-sloping supply curve reflects
increasing cost of making one more unit of
a good as total amount produced
increases.
Supply reflects increasing marginal costs
and demand reflects decreasing marginal
utility.
FIGURE 1-3: The Marshall
Supply-Demand Cross
Price
Supply
Demand
0
22
Quantity
per week
Market Equilibrium
23
Figure 1-3: demand and supply curves
intersect at the market equilibrium point
P*, Q*
P* is equilibrium price: price at which
the quantity demanded by a good’s
buyers precisely equals quantity of that
good supplied by sellers
FIGURE 1-3: The Marshall
Supply-Demand Cross
Price
Demand
.
P*
0
24
Supply
Q*
Equilibrium point
Quantity
per week
Market Equilibrium
25
Both buyers and sellers are satisfied at
this price--no incentive for either to alter
their behavior unless something else
changes
Non-equilibrium Outcomes
26
If an event causes the price to be set
above P*, demanders would wish to buy
less than Q,* while suppliers would
produce more than Q*.
If something causes the price to be set
below P*, demanders would wish to buy
more than Q* while suppliers would
produce less than Q*.
Change in Market Equilibrium: Increased
Demand
27
Figure 1-4 people’s demand for good
increases, as represented by shift of
demand curve from D to D’
New equilibrium established where
equilibrium price increases to P**
FIGURE 1-4: An increase in Demand
Alters Equilibrium Price and Quantity
D
Price
S
P*
0
28
Q*
Quantity
per week
FIGURE 1-4: An increase in Demand
Alters Equilibrium Price and Quantity
D’
Price
S
D
P**
P*
0
29
Q* Q**
Quantity
per week
Change in Market Equilibrium:
decrease in Supply
30
Figure 1-5: supply curve shifts leftward
(towards origin)--reflects decrease in
supply because of increased supplier
costs (increase in fuel costs)
At new equilibrium price P**, consumers
respond by reducing quantity demanded
along Demand curve D
FIGURE 1-5: A shift in Supply Alters
Equilibrium Price and Quantity
S
Price
P*
D
0
31
Q*
Quantity
per week
FIGURE 1-5: Shift in Supply Alters
Equilibrium Price and Quantity
S’
Price
S
P**
P*
D
0
32
Q** Q*
Quantity
per week