Transcript Slide set

Role of CTLA-4 polymorphism in susceptibility to
type 1 diabetes:
Results of a family and a case-control study in
Southern Tunisia
Immunology Department, Habib Bourguiba University
Hospital, Sfax ,Tunisia
Ferjeni ZOUIDI
Pr Hatem MASMOUDI
INTRODUCTION
 Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is characterized by autoimmune destruction of
insulin-producing β-cells in the pancreas resulting from the action of
environmental factors on genetically predisposed individuals
 β cells Destruction is caused by the infiltration of islets of Langerhans by
CD8+ and CD4+ T lymphocytes
 The HLA region account for approximately 50% of the genetic
determination of the T1D. The other half is made up of multiple genes,
each having a limited individual impact on genetic susceptibility
OBJECTIVE
Studying the role of two SNPs (CT/60 and AG/49) CTLA-4 gene in susceptibility
to T1D.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS
Subjects
 Family study: 56 families (25 multiplex each comprising at least 2
diabetics and 31 simplex) including 87 with type 1 diabetes and 178 of their
first-degree relatives were analysed
 Case-control study
The case-control study has been performed on the 56 index cases (35 men, 21
women ;median onset age 13,10 ± 4,5 years; range, 2 to 45 ) and 120 healthy
control subjects (12 men and 108 women; median onset age 42 years; range,
25 to 65) with no family history of diabetes
 Methods
 PCR-RFLP
 Statistical study
FBAT( family based association test) was applied to identify alleles and
haplotypes preferentially transmitted from heterozygous parents to affected
offspring
X ² test was used to compare categorical data between patients with type 1 diabetes
and controls
RESULTS
Table 1: Distribution of alleles frequencies (%), haplotype and FBAT results
Allèles/haplotypes
A
G
C
T
AT
GC
AC
GT
Frequencies (%)
72%
28%
54%
46%
Z
-1.23
1.23
1.51
-1.51
p
2.21
2.21
0.13
0.13
41%
29.2%
28.5%
01.4%
-1.49
1.54
0.15
-
0.13
0.12
0.87
-
Z is significant if its value is ≥ 1.96 or ≤ -1.96 with a p less than 0.05
FBAT analysis showed no preferential transmission of both alleles and
haplotypes from parents to affected children for the AG/49 and CT60 polymorphisms
(p=2.21,p=0.13 respectively)
Table 2: Genotype and allele distribution of the CTLA-4 CT60 and AG/49 SNP in DT1
patients and controls.
CT60
AG/49
Alleles/Genotypes
C
T
CC
CT
TT
A
G
AG
GG
AA
controls(%)
55.83
44.16
37.5
36.66
25.83
68.33
31.66
10.00
43.33
46.66
DT1(%)
55.35
44.64
30.35
50.00
19.64
p
0.93
0.93
0.35
0.93
0.36
69.64
30.35
07.81
39.28
50
0.80
0.80
0.61
0.88
0.68
Discussion
For the case-control study no
significant differences (p=0.80,
p=0.93 respectively) was
detected for the markers CTLA-4
CT60 and AG/49 respectively.
Our study indicate that the
49A/G and CT60 polymorphisms of
the CTLA-4 gene are not associated
with increased susceptibility to DT1
in southern Tunisia.
This result is consistent with that reported by others family studies [Marron MP et al;1997Angel B et al;2009]. Furthermore other case-control studies in Great Britain, Northern
Ireland, China, and Slovakia found no association between polymorphism AG/49, CT60 and
T1D[Nisticò L et al;1996-Dallos T et al;2008]. However, the results of many case-control
studies showed a great association between the two markers and DT1[Benmansour J et
al;2010-Mayans S et al;2007]