Introduction to the Biology of Spoilage Yeasts and Brettanomyces
Download
Report
Transcript Introduction to the Biology of Spoilage Yeasts and Brettanomyces
Introduction to the Biology of
Spoilage Yeasts and
Brettanomyces
Linda F. Bisson
Department of Viticulture and Enology
University of California
Presentation Outline
Introduction
to Yeast Spoilage
The Biology of Brettanomyces
INTRODUCTION TO YEAST SPOILAGE
Types of Yeast Spoilage
Film
formers
Residual sugar utilizers
Survivalists
Film Formers
Candida,
Pichia
– Candida spp
– P. anomala
– P. membranifaciens
Torulaspora
Hansenula
Dependent
upon oxygen exposure and
head space
May be aromatically neutral or sources of
off-aromas
Residual Sugar Utilizers
Saccharomyces
Zygosaccharomyces
– Z. bailii
– Z. bisporous
– Z. rouxii
Saccharomycodes
ludwigii
Can grow in bottle post-bottling
Can form turbidity and be aromatically neutral
Can form off-characters
Survivalists
Brettanomyces/Dekkera
Pichia
guilliermondii
Produce off-characters
Types of Yeast Spoilage
Off-character
Turbidity
Films
and sediments
THE BIOLOGY OF
BRETTANOMYCES/DEKKERA
Historical Background
Brettanomyces
is a budding yeast found
widely distributed in nature.
Discovered in beer in 1904 (Claussen), in
wine (Krumbholz & Tauschanoff, 1930) and
again in 1940 (Custers).
Results in a variety of aromas.
– English Character or Lambic Beers.
– Spoilage/Regional Character in wines.
Taxonomy
Anamorphic/non-sexual
form: Brettanomyces
Teleomorphic/sexual form: Dekkera
Several species are found: B. bruxellensis, B.
anomala, B. custerianus
Characteristic traits:
–
–
–
–
–
Ascomycete yeast
Reproduce by budding
Observation of sporulation is rare
Pseudohyphae formed
Fermentation end products: acetic acid and CO2
dominate
– Fermentation more rapid in presence of air: Custer’s
effect
Morphology
Cell
Morphology
– Ogival, bullet shaped,
non-uniform
– Sometimes arranged in
pseudohyphae.
Ascospore
Morphology
– Conquistador hatshaped
– 1 to 4 spores/ascus
Brettanomyces Genomics
Chromosomal
number varies by strain
Chromosome configuration not well preserved
Not a simple haploid or diploid
– Hybrid between two strains with similar but different
genomes?
– Diploid progenitor that lost the ability to engage in
sexual reproduction (genome renewal)
Accumulation
of allelic differences and
polymorphisms
– Hyper-mutagenic?
– Defective in repair?
Brettanomyces Characteristics
Custer’s
effect: oxygen stimulates
glycolysis
Capable of ethanol production from sugars
anaerobially
Produce acetic acid from sugars
aerobically
Can produce viable petite (non-fermenting)
off-spring
Brettanomyces vs. Saccharomyces
Saccharomyces:
grows 5 times faster
Brettanomyces has slightly higher ethanol yields (1015%)
Saccharomyces produces more glycerol (6 fold higher)
Brettanomyces produces more biomass (20 to 30%
more)
Brettanomyces more tolerant of large changes in pH
and temperature
Brettanomyces has a more energy-efficient
metabolism
Metabolism of Brettanomyces
Can
use numerous sugars, ethanol, other
carbon compounds, and even amino acids as
carbon sources
Can survive in very nutrient poor condition
Can survive extreme environments and is
found in VNC states
Produces diverse metabolic end products
from grape components:
» Volatile Phenols
» Tetrahydropyrazines
Brettanomyces and Oxygen
Oxygen
stimulates growth, acetic acid
formation and glycolysis (Custer’s effect)
Oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetic acid is
favored over reduction to alcohol
Leads to depletion of NAD+
Requires co-substrates or oxygen for
acetic acid production
Redox state of cytoplasm has a strong
impact on metabolites produced
Brettanomyces Spoilage Characters
Vinyl
phenols
Ethyl phenols
Biogenic amines
– Putrescine
– Cadaverine
– Spermidine
Acetic
acid
Vinyl Phenol Formation
Detoxification?
Co-Substrate?
Vinyl Phenol Formation
4-EP
formation is growth associated
4-EP formation not correlated with acetic
acid formation
High 4-EP producers tolerate higher
environmental levels of p-coumaric acid
Production of Vinyl Phenols by Brettanomyces
OH
OH
H
H
Cinnamate
CH
OH
decarboxylase
CH
CH
H
Vinyl phenol
reductase
CH2
CH2
CH2
COOH
H
= coumaric
OH
= caffeic
OMe
= ferulic
Is That Smell Desirable?
Three
main spoilage compounds:
– 4-Ethylphenol (band aid)
– 4-Ethylguaiacol (smoky medicinal)
– 4-Ethylcatechol (horsy)
Detection
threshold varies with varietal from
126 to 420 ppb of 4-EP depending upon matrix
Recovery Thresholds:
– 50% of tasters can detect 605 ppb in wine or 440 ppb
in water of 4-EP
Chatonnet
has defined spoilage as:
– >426 ppb of 4-EP and 4-EG
– >620 ppb of 4-EP
Incidence of Spoilage
Country
>426ppb
>620ppb
France
36%
28%
Italy
49%
19%
Australia
59%
46%
Portugal
42%
27%
Wines may contain up to 50 ppm (!) of 4-EP
Brett Signature Taints Tasting
Glass
1: Control (Merlot)
Glass 2: 1000ppb 4-EP
Glass 3: 620 ppb 4-EP
Glass 4: 400ppb 4-EG
Glass 5: 430: 350ppb 4-EP + 80 4-EG
Glass 6: 2200: 1800 4-EP + 400 4-EG
Brett Alternative Substrates Tasting
Glass
1: Control: Brett in media minus
supplements
Glass 2: Ferulic acid
Glass 3: Coumaric acid
Glass 4: Phenylalanine
Glass 5: Tryptophan and Tyrosine
Glass 6: Lysine