Presentation

Download Report

Transcript Presentation

Modeling Tumor Growth
Mathematics Clinic
Prof. Lisette de Pillis
Dr. Yi Jiang
Cris Cecka, Alan Davidson, Tiffany Head,
Dana Mohamed, and Liam Robinson
Los Alamos National Lab
• Operated by:
University of
California
• For: Department of
Energy
• Location: Northern
New Mexico
• Missions:
– National Security
– Scientific Research
Social Implications
●
●
●
Cancer - the 2nd leading cause of
death in the U.S.
Chemotherapy harmful to patient
Better tumor models can help to
develop more effective treatments
The Main Goal
Scanning Electron Micrograph
• Given:
– Model of a tumor spheroid
• No blood vessels
• Very small
• Goals:
– To extend model to include blood vessels
• Different vasculature structures
– To study chemotherapy treatments
*http://www.vet.purdue.edu/cristal/sem-spheroid1-black.gif
Model Description
• The three cell types within the model are:
– proliferating cells: alive, can divide and grow
– quiescent cells: alive, but dormant
– necrotic cells: dead
Model Description
• Tumor described on 3 biological levels:
– Cellular:
• 3D grid of ‘sites’ created
• Cells can grow and occupy multiple sites
– Extracellular:
• Nutrients, waste, chemicals diffuse through
tumor cells
– Subcellular:
• Chemical concentrations cause the cells to
respond
Simulated Model Cross-Section
• Grid site
• Tumor cell
Initialize
*Adapted from a flow chart in: Yi Jiang
et. al. “A Multiscale Model for
Avascular Tumor Growth”
Monte Carlo Movement
Solve Diffusion Equation
Determine Protein Expression
Chemicals/Volume Favorable?
Quiescent/Necrotic
Time to Divide?
Divide into 2 Cells
Possible Cell Shedding
if on Surface
Monte Carlo
• A stochastic algorithm
• Strategy
– Make a random
change
• Find a border
• Change cell
ownership
– Calculate the
difference in energy
– Accept/Reject
change
• Boltzmann factor
Chemical Diffusion
• Chemicals the cells use in this model:
– O2, Glucose, Waste, Growth Factors, and Inhibitory Factors
• Modeling the time-dependent chemical diffusion
equation:
– Finite Difference Approximations
• yields a linear system of equations
Cell Cycle
Proliferating Cells
Quiescent Cells
GSK3b
TGFb
SCF
SMAD
P15
P27
CyCD, CDK4
P21
CyCE, CDK2
Rb
E2F
S phase
*www.bmb.psu.edu/courses/biotc/489/biointeract.htm
*Adapted from a flow chart in Yi Jiang et. al.
“A Multiscale Model for Avascular Tumor Growth”
Addition of Vasculature
• New blood vessel ‘cell’ type added:
– can occupy sites
– constant chemical concentrations
• Reasonable as the speed of the relevant chemical
diffusion is slow compared to the rate of blood
flow through the vessel.
Vasculature Structure
• Can select one of three different vasculature
structures
– Single Vein
– Grid Lattice Structure
– Hexagonal Lattice Structure
• Have been observed in biological tumors
• Adds a greater degree of flexibility to the model
• Allows for more structural options to be added
later
Extending the Monte Carlo
• Extend the J-matrix to include vasculature
• Vasculature should be static
• Other cells should not encroach upon
vasculature
• The vasculature should not grow
PDE Solver
•
Recall the time-dependent diffusion equation:
•
To solve with arbitrary boundary conditions
– We use a Backwards Euler approximation
– Stable Linear System
•
Solve linear system with Gauss-Seidel method
– Iterative method
– Stable, guaranteed convergence for our system
• Strictly (but weakly) Diagonally Dominant
Vasculature and BCs
• Treat vasculature as boundary conditions
– Can be in an arbitrary geometry
• PDE solver supports this
applying the identity iteration.
Grid Sites
0
Constant Line
Vasculature
Grid Sites
200
200
No
Vasculature
Grid Sites
200
Avascular vs Vascularized Tumor
0
Grid Sites
200
Grid Sites
Delayed
0
Grid Sites
200
Constant
200
Line
Grid Sites
200
Delayed vs Constant Vasculature
0
Grid Sites
200
Grid Sites
0
Delayed
Grid Sites
200
Constant
200
Square Grid
Grid Sites
200
Delayed vs Constant Vasculature
0
Grid Sites
200
Grid Sites
0
Delayed
Grid Sites
200
Constant
200
Hexagonal Grid
Grid Sites
200
Delayed vs Constant Vasculature
0
Grid Sites
200
Types of Chemotherapeutic Agents
• Cell Cycle Specific vs. Non Cell Cycle Specific
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Alkylating Agents
Nitrosoureas
Antimetabolites
Anthracyclines
Topoisomerase II Inhibitors
Mitotic Inhibitors
Corticosteroid Hormones
Apoptosis vs. Necrosis
• Two types of cell death:
– Apoptosis
– Necrosis
While necrosis leaves debris after cell death
occurs, apoptosis does not.
This has implications for the diffusion of
chemicals.
Drug Pharmacokinetics
Cancerboard.ab.ca, www.Canceractive.com
• Route of administration
• Dose administered
• Dosing interval
• Plasma drug concentrations
Modeling Chemotherapy
• Added cyclophosphamide as a new chemical
• Regularly scheduled doses once the vasculature is
created
• Blood plasma concentration
– Constant boundary condition during each step
– Changes from step to step to simulate AUC profile
• Stochastic model determines if cells become
apoptotic based on drug concentration
• Apoptotic cells replaced by medium
Limitations of the Model for Chemo
• Hardware constraints
• Patient toxicity
• Chemotherapy drug cocktails
Chemotherapy Treatments
37 MCS
Low Dose
Chemotherapy
Grid Sites
200
0
200
Grid Sites
Grid Sites
Grid Sites
0
High Dose
Chemotherapy
200
200
No Treatment
Grid Sites
200
0
Grid Sites
200
Chemotherapy Treatments
40 MCS
Low Dose
Chemotherapy
Grid Sites
200
0
200
Grid Sites
Grid Sites
200
Grid Sites
0
High Dose
Chemotherapy
200
No Treatment
Grid Sites
200
0
Grid Sites
200
Chemotherapy Treatments
50 MCS
Low Dose
Chemotherapy
Grid Sites
200
0
200
Grid Sites
Grid Sites
200
Grid Sites
0
High Dose
Chemotherapy
200
No Treatment
Grid Sites
200
0
Grid Sites
200
Chemotherapy Treatments
60 MCS
Low Dose
Chemotherapy
Grid Sites
200
0
200
Grid Sites
Grid Sites
200
Grid Sites
0
High Dose
Chemotherapy
200
No Treatment
Grid Sites
200
0
Grid Sites
200
Chemotherapy Treatments
64 MCS
Low Dose
Chemotherapy
Grid Sites
200
0
200
Grid Sites
Grid Sites
200
Grid Sites
0
High Dose
Chemotherapy
200
No Treatment
Grid Sites
200
0
Grid Sites
200
Chemotherapy Treatments
No Treatment
Low Dose
Chemotherapy
High Dose
Chemotherapy
Future Work
• Chemotherapy experiments that allow the tumor to
reach a detectable size
• Inclusion of multiple chemotherapy drugs, including
cell cycle specific varieties
• Patient toxicity simulation
• Optimal control
– Treatment schedule
– Dose level
Acknowledgments
●
●
●
●
●
●
Prof. Lisette DePillis, Advisor
Dr. Yi Jiang, Liason
Prof. Michael Raugh, Clinic Director
Los Alamos National Lab, Sponsor
Barbara Schade, Administrative Assistant
Claire Connelly, System Administrator
Questions