Transcript Document
3. cvičenie
ADR. EBM.
• Each pharmacotherapy means
risk akceptation,
each drug can have potential
risk for patient
benefit
• Risk of pharmacotherapy
should never exceed risks
of not treating particular
disease!!!
risk
Pharmacovigilance
Includes all aspects of postmarketing
development:
- monitoring of clinical safety
- identification of new threats
- estimation of risk and contribution
- action and communication
Goal: to prove product safety
Pharmacovigilance
• We take into consideration during drug selection:
–
–
–
–
EFFICACY
SAFETY
PRICE
SUITABILITY
• in 60th after talidomid scandal, WHO established
monitoring focused to early detection of ADR
• WHO created system of spontanneous ADR
monitoring with center in Uppsala (Sweden)
TALIDOMID
• 1959-1961: sedative, hypnotic drug for
pregnant women (marketed in Germany, England,
Canada..., never in USA)
• Born were > 12 000 children with
phocomelia
• Now: new indications – imunomodulatory,
antiangiogenic and antiinflammatory
properties:
– skin lupus erythematodes
– skin form of lepra
– Kaposi´s sarcoma at AIDS ...
ADVANTAGES of
pharmacovigilance
at worldwide cooperation
• Large number of treated patients
• Detection of possible race variations
• Detection of rare ADR
• Possibility of soon warning of particular
drug risk all over the world
SIDE EFFECT
Each unintend drug effect, occuring at normal
doses used for patients, which is in relation to
pharmacologic properties of drug.
(antihypertensive effect of
minoxidil
+
hypertrichosis)
ADVERSE EVENT Each noxious health event,
which can occur during therapy, but doesn´t have
to have relation with this therapy.
(patient takes ATB and breaks his leg)
ADVERSE DRUG REACTION =
ADR
• Reaction to drug which is noxious and unintended
and occurs at doses of drugs normally used for
prophylaxis, diagnosis or treatment of disease or to
modify physiologic functions
• Detection of ADR at targeted monitoring 10-30%.
• At spontanneous monitoring < than 1%.
• Intoxications and mistakes in therapy don´t belong
here
UNEXPECTED ADVERSE REACTION
Adverse reaction whose character or intensity isn´t in
concordance with domestic informations about drug
or isn´t expected according to drug characteristic.
SIGNAL
Reported information about possible causal
relationship between adverse event and, this
relationship was yet unknown or incompletely
documented. Usually more than 1 report is required for
signal.
Risk factors of ADR
Drug
Pacient
• nonselective and nonspecific
• with narrow therapeutics range
• lipophilic
Prescription
• Wrong selection of drug, drug
combination, dose, route of
administration, therapy length
• polymorbidity
• diseases of organs of
elimination
• age, women
• pharmacokinetic variability
(etnic group, genetic
polymorphism)
• compliance
Number of drugs
0-5
6-10
11-15
> 16
ADR
4%
10%
28%
54%
I. ADR according to mechanism of
origin
1.
Type A („augmented“)
• these ADR are expected
• they can be predicted on the base of
pharmacodynamic properties of drug
• they depend on drug dose, they appear at higher
doses
• frequency is high > than 1%
• mortality is low
• therapy consists in dose adjustment
• e.g.: cough after ACEI, bleeding from GIT after
NSA, aspirin, corticoids ...
rash
2.
Type B („bizard“)
• idiosyncratic reactions
• these ADR are not expected
• they can be hardly predicted
• doesn´t depend on dose
• frequency is low < than 0,1%
• mortality is high
• treatment consists in stopping drug administration
• e.g.: haemolytic anaemia after metyldopa,
hepatitis induced by isoniazid,
allergic reaction after PNC ...
TYPE A
TYPE B
Predictability
+
–
Dosage
dependence
Occurrence
+
–
high
low
Mortality
low
high
dose
adjustment
stopping
administration
Treatment
1 drug – different types of ADR
DRUG
Type A reaction
Type B reaction
Ampicillin
Pseudomembr.
colitis
Intersticial
nephritis, allergy
Chlorpropamid
Sedation
Hepatotoxicity
Naproxen
GIT haemorrhage Agranulocytosis
Warfarin
Bleeding
Breast necrosis
3.
Type C („continous“)
• this type of ADR increases number of
“spontanneous“ diseases
• they occur usually after long-lasting
administration
• they are often serious and persistant
• mechanism of genesis is unclear
• they are unexpected, not predictable
• they can´t be verified experimentally
• e.g.: oral contraceptives and increased
occurrence of thromboembolia, analgetic
nephropaty
4. Type D („delayed“)
•
•
•
•
•
late ADR (years resp. generations)
teratogenity
carcinogenity
mutagenity
e.g.: ca. of vagina at daughters of mothers treated
with dietylstilbestrol
5. Type E („End of use“)
• after therapy ending (syndrom from omitting)
• rebound phenomenon
• e.g.: beta blockers, opioids, corticosteroids,
nitrates ...
II. ADR according to intensity
• mild – don´t require to stop or to change treatment
• moderate – require to change therapy, but don´t
threat life of the patient
• serious – death, hospitalization, invalidization,
teratogenity
III. ADR according to
frequency
Frequency
• frequent
>1,0 % (sedative effect after
promethazin)
• seldom
>0,1% (rhabdomyolysis after statins)
• rare
> 0,01% (agranulocytosis after
metamizol)
Determination of causality
Basic categories:
A. High probability of causality
B. No sufficient proof of causality
0. Isn´t possible to evaluate causality
ACTIONS AT PROOF OF
CAUSALITY
•
•
•
•
•
warning
methodic direction
limitation of indication
change of dose
deregistration of the drug
Deregistered drugs
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
troglitazon
benaxoprofen
terfenadin
mibefradil
cerivastatin – 2001-2002
rofekoxib, vadekoxib – 2004-2005
group with the highest risk NSA
(> 30% of deregistrations)
• % of ADR reported at active monitoring :
10-30% (mostly done by
pharmaceutical companies
during clinical trials)
at pasive monitoring < 1%
• Type A ADR: - 80%
• Treatment of ADR represents 13-15% of
therapy costs
• ADR occurs mostly between 1-10 day from
beginning of therapy
EBM (Evidence based medicine )
• EBM brings proofs about efficacy and safety
from large clinical studies
• Applied are relevant statistic methods,
metaanalysis
• These results are used for creating
recommandations for therapy (guidelines)
P
R
E
D
P
Í
Š
T
E
R
E
C
E
P
T