The 2002 G8 Kananaskis Summit
Download
Report
Transcript The 2002 G8 Kananaskis Summit
International dimensions
of drug policy
Senate Special Committee
on Illegal Drugs
March 18, 2001
Terry Cormier
Foreign Affairs and International Trade
Overview
Context
Challenges
International legal architecture
International developments
Policy challenges
2
International dimensions
Multi-dimensional aspects: diplomatic, policy,
financial, humanitarian, legal, law enforcement
In many multilateral and regional fora
Different countries have particular
preoccupations
3
Public Safety:
International dimensions
Integration results in new threats to the
safety and security of Canadians
Global challenges require global
responses
Coherence, coordination, leadership
Horizontal issue management
Growing agenda of public safety issues
4
Problems of international
drug trade
Corruption
Violence
Undermines state and rule of law
Afghanistan
Economic dislocation
Health issues
Money laundering
Trafficking in firearms
5
International Institutional
Structure
UN
Economic and Social Council
Commission on Narcotic Drugs
UNDCP
International Narcotics Control Board
World Health Organization
OAS
6
Single Convention on Narcotic
Drugs, 1961
Objective: limit the production and trade in
prohibited substances
Establishes UN architecture
Deals with control largely by criminal
penalties
4 Schedules
Cannabis is in Schedule 4, subject to highest
level of control
7
Convention on Psychotropic
Substances, 1971
Deals with pervasive use and availability
of synthetic, psychotropic substances
Follows template of Single Convention
Recognizes the medical necessity
4 Schedules of control
Requires drugs to be specifically listed
8
Convention against Illicit Traffick in
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic
Substances, 1988
Instrument of international criminal law
Intent is to harmonize national, drugrelated criminal laws and enforcement
actions
Obligations to create and implement very
specific criminal laws
Specifically obligates Parties “to respect
fundamental human rights”
9
International Conventions:
Cannabis possession
Consensus view is that it is not possible to
decriminalize cannabis and be in
conformity with the three Conventions
Parties have latitude with respect to
penalties and sanctions
Conventions recognize explicitly domestic
law
10
Multilateral Evaluation
Mechanism
Under Canadian chairmanship and
leadership MEM was developed by the
OAS Inter-American Drug Abuse Control
Commission (CICAD)
Peer group evaluation mechanism
Supply and demand
Broadening the understanding of the
impact of drugs in our societies
11
CHALLENGES
Anticipation of future threats
chemical drugs, ATS
nano technologies
Keeping international and domestic
contexts in some relative equilibrium
12
International environment
International environment is changing
Substance abuse issues are now
considered in broader context -- demand
and supply
Growing recognition that we should
differentiate among classes of drugs
Greater appreciation for the broader
social, political, economic impacts
13
Conclusion
Canada promotes multilateralization of
international rules
Substance abuse issues are critical social
policy issues which engage many different
actors
Essentially a political issue
14