Transcript Slide 1
Novel Therapy for Treating Human
Glioblastomas
http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/default.asp?page=96#cancer_cells_dont_stop
By:
Rajwant Singh Bedi
Chemical Engineering
Glioblastoma Mutiforme
Most common type of malignant primary
brain tumor
Typically contain more than one type of
cells.
Characterized by rapid growth, these
tumors can grow quite large before
clinically relevant symptoms appear.
Symptoms include:
Motor weakness.
Severe headaches, nausea, vomiting.
Sometimes seizures.
http://www.emedicine.com/med/topic2692.htm
http://www.irsa.org/glioblastoma.html
Glioblastoma Mutiforme
Normal cells survive at a pH=7.4
Glioblastomas can survive at pH=6.9
Low pH is produced by lack of blood supply.
No oxygen is received by cells for oxidative
phosphorylation, so cells use glycolysis,
which builds up protons inside the cells.
Glioblastomas use NHE1 to exchange H+ for
Na+ ions to increase pH inside the cell and
maintain homeostasis.
Previous attempts for a cure
Radiation Therapy
Slows down tumor proliferation, but does not
cure the tumor.
Can also damage normal tissue.
Chemotherapy
Highly toxic drugs are needed to cross the
blood-brain barrier.
These drugs may be toxic to other organs in the
body. So, combinations of drugs are used to find
the best drugs for the treatment.
Surgery
Impossible to identify and remove all of tumor
tissue which extends into normal tissue.
Why new therapy is required?
Poor clinical prognosis
High recurrence rate
Patients typically live only 6-12 months
following diagnosis regardless of
therapeutic regimen
Novel Therapy
Amiloride derivatives
Carefully designed to exploit metabolic
differences between normal and tumor
cells
To produce cell death, drug must inhibit
NHE1 and NCX to cause intracellular
acidosis and loss of calcium regulation
Preferably only active in CNS or tumor
Testing efficacy of the drug
Inhibition constant
IC50—concentration of drug where 50%
Inhibition of NHE1 occurs
Lower Inhibition constant is better as
less amount of drug is required to
successfully inhibit 50% of
sodium/hydrogen exchange in the tumor
cell.
Methodology
Determination of NHE1 IC50
Cells grown in Petri dishes
37 degrees Celsius
pH=7.4
Cells are subjected to the drug in vitro
changes in pH are measured
spectrofluorometrically using a fluorescent dye,
2’,7’bis(carboxyethyl)-5,6-carboxyfluorescin
acetoxy-methyl ester (BCECF)
Excitation wavelengths: 507/440nm
Emission wavelength: 535 nm
Ammonium Prepulse Method
Hepes Ringer
Baseline measurement of pH
NH4Cl
Acidification of cell
NMDG
Sodium free solution which stops
sodium/hydrogen exchange
Add sodium to observe recovery +/-Drug
Drug inhibits NHE1, and thus recovery is slower
than just adding Na-containing Hepes ringer.
Graph produced by Data
Figure 1:
Control pHi Recovery
7.700
7.600
7.500
7.400
pHi
7.300
7.200
7.100
7.000
6.900
HR
6.800
0
200
400
600
800
time (seconds)
1000
1200
1400
Graphs continued…
Figure 2:
500µM C2-Am-Gly
7.250
pHi
7.150
7.050
6.950
HR
NHE1i
6.850
0
500
1000
time (seconds)
1500
Graphs continued…
Figure 3:
500µM C2-Am-Gly NHE Inhibition
7.000
6.990
y = 0.0002x + 6.6939
R2 = 0.9856
6.980
6.970
pHi
6.960
6.950
6.940
6.930
6.920
6.910
6.900
900
1000
1100
time (seconds)
1200
1300
Graphs continued…
Figure 4:
IC50 Determination from Ki vs Concentration
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
Ki
0.6
y = -0.2052Ln(x) + 1.3866
R2 = 0.9899
Ki
0.5
Log. (Ki)
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
50
100
150
200
250
concentrations (uM)
300
350
400
450
500
Data Analysis
Concentration
(µM)
NHE1i Slope
Control Slope
NHE1i slope:
Determined from
Figure 2
Ki
500
0.0005
0.0036
0.08
100
0.0015
0.0038
0.39
10
0.0028
0.003
0.93
y-intercept
1.3866
coefficient
-0.2052
ln x (when y =
0.5)
x (IC50) µM
4.320662768
75
Control Slope:
Determined from
Figure 1
Ki=NHE1i slope/
Control slope
Y-intercept and
Coefficient:
Determined from
Figure 4
IC50: Determined
From equation
Given by figure 4
Conclusion
IC50 C2-Amiloride Glycine
75 uM
Is lower than IC50 of Amiloride (124 uM)
Lower IC50 means that a lower
concentration of drug is required to
inhibit 50% of sodium/hydrogen
exchange in the tumor cell.
Further Experimentation
In vivo experiments
Track tumor progression in animal mode
using Proton Magnetic Resonance
Spectroscopy (MRS) imaging in the
presence or absence of new drugs
Acknowledgements
Fredric A. Gorin, Dept. of Neurology.
Michael Nantz, Dept. of Chemistry.
Hasan Palandoken, Dept. of
Chemistry.
Bill Harley, Dept. of Neurology.