Transcript Document

Patient Safety, FTCA, RM, and Quality
Working Together
December 2, 2008
Petra S. Berger PhD RN, CPHRM
Healthcare Quality, Risk, and Patient Safety Consultant
[email protected]
-
Phone: 517–281-7816
1
Learning Objectives

Outline how the overall Quality management (QM)
agenda at Health centers can be practically
integrated with the distinct missions and goals of
Risk management (RM), Quality improvement (QI),
Patient safety (PS), and FTCA.

Discuss how Quality management strategies
can insure that efforts are aligned, coordinated and
measured between all four aspects: Risk
management, Quality improvement, Patient safety,
and FTCA.
2
Concepts of Integration in
QM/QI, RM, Patient safety, and FTCA
3
Bridging the Quality Chasm
QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Patient Safety = Q. I.
Risk Management
= identify risk – respond – prevent
4
QUALITY GOALS: 4 + RM
on O N E Quality Management Platform

Clinical Effectiveness: e.g. hypertension, DM



Patient Satisfaction


complaint management
Regulatory compliance: e.g. P & Ps



Continuity of care vs. fragmentation
missed diagnosis
after hours coverage
patient education omitted
Efficiency, UR, Cost control

some staff unqualified for job scope
5
QM and RM: Clinical Protocols







Pre natal risk assessment & OB practice
Fever in Children (ACEP)
Stroke
Chest pain
Abdominal pain
Anticoagulant Management
Sample protocols can be accessed at
http://www.guideline.gov/
6
QM and RM:
TJC: National Pt Safety Goals

Patient identification

Verbal /phone orders
Critical lab value reporting
Hand off @ transition
Patient /family involvement in care
Medication reconciliation
Suicide assessment





7
CORE PURPOSE of
PROACTIVE RISK MANAGEMENT
S T O P ADVERSE OUTCOMES

Eliminate Patient harm


Protect Healthcare facility from



due to medical error & oversight
litigation and financial loss
patient and community distrust
Protect involved Providers
8
FTCA focus
Health Center Claims Management
RECENT FTCA CLAIMS DATA





Claims Occurrence
Error in Diagnosis
30%
Treatment related
21%
Medication related
10%
OB Related
22%
Surgical Procedures 6%
Claims Location
Health Center 65%
Hospital 35%
9
Summary of Risk issues @ CHS’s



Risk aspect
Risk aspect
Risk aspect
Risk aspect








#1: Patient communication
#2: Provider Team Communication
#3: The Medical Record
#4: Clinic Operation & Flow
Diagnostic test tracking
After hours coverage; telephone triage
Risk aspect
Risk aspect
Risk aspect
Risk aspect
Risk aspect
Risk aspect
#5: Clinical Practice
#6: Misdiagnosis (clinical)
#7: Medication Safety
#8: Equipment – EOC – Emergency
#9: Clinic Staff performance
#10: Medical Provider Quality/ Peer review
10
QM & RM factor: Patient communication

Patient assessment & interview


Treatment planning & contracting



Importance of preventive services
Encourage self-management of health issues
Health instruction – literacy – interpreters


Health instruction, dialogue and rapport
Explain back / read back
Patient feedback & satisfaction
11
The Medical record & Legibility:
Guess that Prescription

Handwritten prescriptions are often misread
In the prescription above, the drug name

was incorrectly interpreted as Coumadin.

http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/557740?src=mp
From American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy


“Avandia”
12
Quality & Risk aspects
MEDICAL RECORD DOCUMENTATION

? Illegibility & error prone abbreviations

?Treatment rationale

?Diagnostic Follow Up

?Omissions \ delays in care

?Contradictions; confusion between provider

?Finger pointing, subjective statements

?Corrections: Write overs & White out

Altered Medical Records; “Late entries”
13
QM & RM, Clinic operation & Flow:
Telephone triage & legible Documentation
Using protocols adopted by medical staff,
or direct consultation w/ med. provider

Name of Caller & purpose of call
Advice & orders given (prescription refills)
Follow-up instructions
Date, time, AND initial of provider

Review through Q.I. process




Based on criteria of clinical protocols
14
Clinic operation & Flow
Missed appointments – ‘No Shows’

Tracking high-risk patients who miss
scheduled appointment
 Pending diagnostic results?

Documenting all notification attempts

Include medical implication of missing
appointments

If worsened outcome possible, a certified
letter is sent, with copy & receipt in medical
record
15
Clinical practice
Pre-natal risk assessment

PRE NATAL ASSESSMENT per protocol (standardized)


Consistent documentation, prenatal visits
Prompt high risk referral

PRE NATAL MED. RECORD TO HOSPITAL @ 36 wks

Maternal conditions:

hypertension – diabetes – drug & alcohol
http://www.rmf.harvard.edu/; AAFP standards / ACOG standards
16
Clinical practice
BEHAVIORAL HEALTH

Initial Assessment & Treatment Plan



Suicide assessment and precautions
Case management
Medication therapy (?informed consent)


Monitoring of effects and patient compliance
Patient /family education: purpose /side effects

On-going acuity assessment & referrals

Documentation standards & confidentiality
17
Medication Safety
Adverse Medication events related to 4 phases:

Product labeling, packaging, nomenclature

Prescribing: Indications, interaction, off label

Antibiotics, anticoagulants, narcotics,
cardiovascular, steroids; serum levels

Dispensing: compounding, distribution error

Administration: wrong drug/ dose/ route

Verbal or phone orders
Source: National Coordinating Council on Medication Error Reporting
and Prevention –www.nccmerp.org
18
Credentialing Focus
Initial credentialing varies from re- credentialing

INITIAL:
Licensure verification, References re: privileges
Qualifying education & experience, NPDB

RE-CREDENTIALING:
Quality & Risk data required



Which value-added measures to select
How to obtain the data efficiently
What to do with quality information
19
Quality Strategies
to Align, Coordinate, Measure
QM/QI, RM, Patient Safety, FTCA efforts
20
QM & RM
COLLABORATION FOR PATIENT SAFETY
Co-design corrective Quality Improvement actions
from a systems-based perspective
Correct flawed systems and processes:




Are Policies written from Q & R perspective
Quality & Risk aspects in Medical record policies
Similar QI projects already underway?
New Risk event info used to adjust QI priorities
ASHRM Task Force. “Different Roles, Same Goals: Risk and Quality Management
Partnering for Patient Safety.” Monograph. 2007
21
What does Risk perspective contribute to QM

Co-use DATA and avoid redundancy –

Incident reports, RCA results, Claims data


Generic Quality screens w/ RM implication




but protect risk information
Waiting time
Unplanned admission to hospital
Infection = now a ‘medical error’!
Medical Record reviews

can identify unexpected PCE (pot. comp. event)
22
Risk Identification =
Quality Assessment

Generic screens: e.g. no show rate

Incident (or occurrence) reporting (1 - 30%)
 Omitted or delayed diagnostic reporting
 Adverse medication event –or near miss
 Patient or family complaint


Staff feedback & surveys
Quality & Risk reporting marathons
23
RM Case: Incomplete Medication History

58-year-old male patient was scheduled for a
major diagnostic procedure at the hospital
where a certified registered nurse anesthetist
(CRNA) provided conscious sedation.

A required copy of the clinic medical record
was sent preoperatively.
No mention was made of the patient’s seizure
medication.

24
RM Case: Seizure & Respiratory arrest




No recent blood level had been obtained related
to the patient’s seizure medication.
Patient compliance with the medication was
unknown.
The patient underwent scheduled procedure
Patient experienced a grand mal seizure during
the procedure and had a respiratory arrest.
Intubation was delayed and the patient suffered
permanent brain damage.
25
Risk response = QI = Patient Safety
A.
RCA results:
CHC Clinical standards of care = ‘duty’

Monitoring, patient medication & document

Test result reported & signed off by provider

Treatment plan updated, w/ or w/out change

Reliable medical record system @ hand off
with external medical providers and hospital
B. CRNA & Hospital standards of care
26
QI opportunity for Patient Safety
Process re-design

Patient assessment & Medication monitoring

Diagnostic test ordering

Diagnostic test tracking

Treatment plan continuity

Hand-off with ext. medical providers, hospital

Provider and Staff communication

Medical record documentation
27
Quality audit = ”QA”
Diagnostic test tracking

Test ordered by med. provider & log

Request form created - copy retained

Test completed - patient compliance?

Results received & logged in / ck log

Results reported to provider (same
day for abnormal /critical results)

Patient notification documented
28
Quality & Risk measures: need both
Sample QUALITY MEASURES




Medical record documentation audits /criteria
Diabetic HgbA1C baseline & improvement
Pediatric Immunization rates
Hypertension improved
Sample RISK MEASURES





Patient complaints
Misfiled and non initialed test results
Missed diagnosis: Cancer
Insulin medication error and patient harm
Adherence to Anticoagulation guidelines
29
• Select problem
process
• Make change
permanent
(standardize) or
• Understand
the process
• Continue the
PDCA cycle
• Decide on
process steps
to improve
• Collect data
• Analyze data
• Data collection
• Determine the
effectiveness
of the change
• Implement the
change /pilot
• Data analysis
30