No Slide Title
Download
Report
Transcript No Slide Title
FDLI Introduction to Medical
Device Law and Regulation
Other Postmarket Controls
Philip Katz
(202) 624-2660
[email protected]
October 29, 2002
Washington, D.C.
Device Tracking
FDCA § 519(e)
21 CFR Part 821 (amended effective May 9, 2002)
“Guidance on Medical Device Tracking” (Jan. 2000)
2
FDCA § 519(e)
Class II or III device
Failure likely to have serious adverse health consequences
Intended to be implanted for more than one year
Life sustaining/supporting device used outside device
user facility
3
Additional Factors
Likelihood of sudden, catastrophic failure
Likelihood of significant adverse clinical outcome
Need for prompt professional intervention
4
Device Tracking
To ensure that device can be traced from
manufacturing facility to patient
Must be able to locate device quickly
Three days for undistributed device
Ten days for device distributed to patient
5
Device Tracking
Separate order issued with PMA approval or 510(k)
clearance
Methods may vary, but must have written SOPs
Can use outside contractor
6
Device Tracking
Must audit system, to verify that it works and
the information is accurate
Must maintain records as long as device is in
distribution or use
7
Device Tracking
Distributors (such as hospitals and other user
facilities) must track and provide information
to the manufacturer
Obligations start/stop at water’s edge
Patient can refuse identifying information
8
Postmarket Surveillance
FDCA § 522
21 CFR Part 822 (effective July 8, 2002)
“Guidance on Criteria and Approaches for
Postmarket Surveillance” (Nov. 1998)
9
FDCA § 522
Class II or III device
Failure likely to have serious adverse health consequences
Intended to be implanted for more than one year
Life sustaining/supporting device used outside device
user facility
10
Other Criteria
Important unanswered surveillance question
Availability of other postmarket mechanisms
Practicality of surveillance strategies
Magnitude of risk
11
Postmarket Surveillance
Limitations of premarket data
Shortcomings of MDRs
12
Postmarket Surveillance
Required by FDA order, not necessarily at time of
review/clearance
Manufacturer must submit plan in 30 days
FDA has 60 days to judge plan’s adequacy
13
Range of Methods
Literature review
Secondary data sets, registries
Studies (clinical, non-clinical)
14
Postmarket Surveillance
Can last up to three years
Applies to foreign manufacturers
Does not apply to devices for export only
Informed consent and IRB requirements apply
15
Postmarket Surveillance
Interim and final reports
Retain records for two years
Produce records within three days
Records subject to inspection/review
16
Device Promotion
Advertising
Not defined, but see drug regulations
Labeling
Label and “all other written, printed or graphic
matter . . . accompanying” the device
17
Device Promotion
Misleading
FDCA § 201(n)
Not just representations made or suggested, but also
material omissions
18
FDCA § 502 – Misbranding
All devices
False or misleading labeling (FDCA § 502(a))
Adequate directions for use, adequate warnings
(FDCA § 502(f))
Registration, listing, 510(f) notice/information
(FDCA § 502(o))
19
FDCA § 502 – Misbranding
Restricted devices
False or misleading advertising (FDCA § 502(q))
Advertising or “other descriptive matter” lacks side
effects, contraindications (FDCA § 502(r))
20
Device Promotion
Unapproved uses
False or misleading statements
21
Unapproved Uses
Promotion of device that is not approved or cleared
Promotion of cleared/approved device for use that
is not cleared or approved
Not limited to advertising/labeling
22
False or Misleading Statements
Shared jurisdiction
FDA – all labeling, restricted device ads
FTC – all other device ads
Sort of
23
False or Misleading Statements
Jurisdiction makes a difference
Different outlooks
Different processes
Different results
24
False or Misleading Statements
FDA
No clear standard
Can look to drug ad regulations
Can look to FTC
25
False or Misleading Statements
FTC
Identifying the representation
Determine whether it’s true and substantiated
26
FTC
Identify the representation
Express and implied claims
Intent irrelevant
Reasonable interpretation by target audience
27
FTC
Is the claim true and substantiated?
Implied presence of substantiation
“Establishment” claims
True + false = false
28
Other Issues
Internet
First Amendment
29
FDLI Introduction to Medical
Device Law and Regulation
Other Postmarket Controls
Philip Katz
(202) 624-2660
[email protected]
October 29, 2002
Washington, D.C.