Transcript Slide 1

Unanticipated Problems, Protocol
Deviations and Non-Compliance
EMORY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD
VERSION 8-1-13
Objectives
2
 Recognize what constitutes a
UP/NC/reportable PD.
 Understand importance of
prompt reporting to IRB.
 Identify reporting
requirements per
contract/protocol.
Course Content
3
 Unanticipated Problems
 Protocol Deviations
 Noncompliance
 External Events
 IRB Reporting Requirements
 Sponsor Reporting Requirements
 Examples and Practice Examples
What is an Unanticipated Problem?
4
• An unanticipated problem (UP)
is an event that involves a risk
to the participant or others that
probably need changes to the
study protocol, consent forms
and/or investigator brochure
because of increase in study’s
risk
What is an Unanticipated Problem?
5
• For a event to be classified as UP, it
need to fulfill the following
requirements:
• Is unanticipated
• Related to the research
• The event suggest that the
research places subjects or others
at a greater risks of harm than
was previously known.
From http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/AdvEvntGuid.htm
6
Event is Unanticipated if…
7
• It is not a known risk of the
study drug, device, or
procedure or patient’s
underlying medical
condition(s).
• It is not in the protocol,
consent, or investigator’s
brochure.
• It is an anticipated event
that exceeds the anticipated
frequency, severity, or
duration.
Event is related to the research if…
8
• It is possible, probably or
definitively caused by the study
drug, device or procedure OR
• It is more likely than not to be
related.
• Events are not related if:
•
•
They are caused by an underlying
disease or condition of the subject
Or by other circumstances that are
not related to the research.
Event increases risk if…
9
• It happens repeatedly
• They are rare in the absence of
drug/device exposure
• They exceed the anticipated
frequency, severity and
duration
• They require a protocol,
consent or investigator’s
brochure change
An event fulfilling all 3 criteria are promptly reportable to IRB
From http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/AdvEvntGuid.htm
10
Protocol Deviations
11
•
•
Departure from the IRBapproved protocol (it happens)
To be reportable: has to be
substantive and adversely
affecting at least one of the
following:
•
Rights, welfare or safety of
subjects
•
Subjects willingness to
continue in the study
•
Scientific integrity of the
data
Noncompliance
12
• Failure to comply with any of the regulations and policies of the
IRB P&Ps and failure to follow the determinations of the IRB
• Consult the IRB in what is reportable and how to report it.
Minor cases, as determined by the IRB, do not have to be
reported.
• Consult with Education and QA at the Emory IRB in case of
doubt.
External Events
13
 Internal vs. External
 Internal: represents an event that happened
to a subject who was enrolled at an Emory
site or at a site in which the Emory IRB was
the IRB of record
 Only reportable if assessed as UPs
 Exception: if external event is under
supervision of Emory S-I
Check our guidance at Investigator Safety Reporting Obligations to the IRB (ver. 4-25-13)
Prompt Reporting
14
• UPs, NC or reportable PDs= 10 calendar days for
•
•
•
•
reporting
Reports should come with an explanation of why they
are reportable. This is critical for UP submissions.
Internal research-related deaths= promptly reportable
Other unanticipated information that could increase
risk should also be reported.
Late reporting is considered non-compliance as it could
impact patient safety!
Periodic Reporting
15
• Certain things need to be reported to the IRB in during
continuing review, even if they were reported before.
•
•
•
Internal deaths even if not related to study
UPs previously reported (included in a summary)
Internal serious adverse events related to the study (even if they are nor real
ups).
• Please indicate which events are UPs, and any other tracking
data from sponsor.
Do not report!
16
• External events that are not UPs (except if external
site is under a Emory S-I)
• Internal anticipated or unanticipated events that are
not related to the research
• Internal serious or not serious events that are not
related to the research.
• Exemption: Internal not related deaths (CR)
17
Sponsor Obligations
18
• Check your contract with the sponsor to understand your
reporting requirements (sometimes different from IRB’s)
• Record ALL events in your logs, even if they are not reportable to
IRB
• Stay current with recommendations/data from your DSMB
• If you are the sponsor-investigator make sure you are collecting
events from all sites and trending the data with the DSMB.
What do you think?
19
A medical student, who is not on the IRB-approved list of study
personnel, consents a subject for enrollment into a clinical trial.
•
•
Noncompliance
Report or consult with the IRB
What do you think?
20
A subject comes late to a study visit at the infusion center, and as a
result, gets the study medication 2 hours late.
•
•
•
Protocol Deviation
Go through reporting requirements to see if it needs to be
reported to the IRB
Report to sponsor per their requirements
What do you think?
21
You receive a Medwatch form that reports a death from a car
accident in a subject participating in your trial in Texas. The PI in
Texas calls it not related to the study.
•
•
•
Go Through UP Questions
See if you and the Emory PI agree it is not related
If not a UP, then it does not need to be reported to the IRB
What do you think?
22
You read a notice on the FDA website about a new, unexpected
side effect seen in your study drug.
•
•
Review UP Questions in guideline
Report to the IRB if it is an UP
What do you think?
23
The sponsor sends you a letter reporting a SAE. The SAE is being
reported as a UP, but the Emory PI disagrees with the sponsor.
What is the process to follow?
 Report the event as a UP to the IRB
 State that the Emory PI does not agree with this assessment
 The FDA puts the responsibility of assessment on the
sponsor (IND or IDE holder)
What do you think?
24
A subject receiving the study drug was hospitalized after having a
stroke. The subject has a history of diabetes, and had a TIA in the
past year. The PI does not think this event is related to study
participation but is very concerned about the subject. Is this
serious event reportable to the IRB?
 The event is not related. As such, is not reportable to the IRB
 Follow your protocol/contract for your sponsor reporting
requirements.
What do you think?
25
A subject had serious adverse event while receiving the research
chemotherapy regimen. The adverse event is outlined in the ICF,
protocol and IB as a possible adverse event, but the subject is
experiencing a move severe SAE than anticipated. The PI thinks
this is possibly related to study participation. What is the best
approach in this situation?
 If the infection is not greater in severity, duration or frequency,
it may not constitute a UP.
 If the event is not considered a UP, does not need to be
reported to the IRB.
 Keep AE/SAE logs to evaluate for patterns indicating an
increase in severity, frequency or duration beyond what is
described in the protocol.
Questions?
26
 Maria G. Davila
(404)712-0724 or [email protected]
 Shara Karlebach
(404)712-0727 or [email protected]
 Kevin Wack
(404)712-5220 or [email protected]
 Sean Kiskel
(404)712-0766 or [email protected]