Drug Courts: Do they really work?
Download
Report
Transcript Drug Courts: Do they really work?
Re-Entry and
Recidivism
Libby Deschenes, Ph.D.
Cal State University, Long Beach
Barbara Owen, Ph.D. and
Jason Crow
Cal State University, Fresno
Increasing Burden on CJS
Source: Bureau of Justice Statistics Correctional Surveys
2
Drug Offenders Increasing
Percentage of Prison Releases
Source: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/reentry/releases.htm
3
Increases in Recidivism
Source: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/reentry/recidivism.htm#recidivism
4
Challenges of Re-entry
Serious social and medical problems
75% history drug/alcohol abuse
16% report a mental condition
Less than one-third received treatment
Few have marketable skills or sufficient
literacy to become gainfully employed
33%
60%
25%
33%
unemployed at arrest
have GED or HS diploma
in vocational training programs
participated education programs
5
Source: J. Petersilia (2005) Hard Time: Ex-Offenders Returning Home after Prison
Current Research
Study funded by NIJ using archived data
Examines
recidivism patterns during 3 years
post release
Evaluates measures of offense specialization
How do incarceration and recidivism of
males and females differ?
What factors will be important for prisoner
re-entry?
6
Research Design
Secondary data
Collected
by Bureau of Justice Statistics
Three year follow-up of inmates
released in 1994
Discharged
from 15 states
Weighted data for all analyses
248,528
males
23,585 females
7
Data Sources for
Recidivism Measures
Official FBI and state criminal histories
Rearrest
Reconviction
Resentenced
to prison
Official criminal history and state DOC
Return
to prison with or without new sentence
8
Results
Sample characteristics by gender
Demographics
Criminal
history
Recidivism
Patterns of male and female offending
9
Comparing Demographics
by Gender
Females represent 8.7% of total sample
Black women (50.5%) more represented than
White women (48.5%), in direct contrast with
males (Black, 48.3%; White, 50.6%)
Hispanic women underrepresented in
comparison to males (19.6% versus 25%)
Women released later in life than men
10
Type of Incarceration Offense
50%
Male
Female
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Violent
Property
Drugs
Public
Order
Other
11
Comparing Sentences
by Gender
Higher proportion of women (79%) incarcerated
for property or drug offense than men (65%)
Women sentences shorter than males
by 10.3 months, averaging 49.6 months
Women served a mean time of 14.2 months, 6.7
months less than the men
Women served 30.2% of original sentence, men
served 35.7% of original sentence
12
Comparing Criminal History
by Gender
Similar prior arrest rates
(92.8% and 93.2%, respectively)
Males more likely to have at least one
prior conviction (96.9% to 89.1%)
Women less likely to have a prior prison
sentence (37.3% vs. 44.2%)
13
Recidivism for Male and Female
Prisoners
100%
80%
60%
40%
20%
0%
Male
Female
REARR
RECON
RENPS
RPWOW
REARR: Rearrested (recidivated)
RECON: Reconvicted
RENPS: Returned to prison with a new sentence
RPWOW: Returned to prison with or without a new sentence
14
Violent Offense Category by
Recidivism Status by Gender
50%
40%
30%
Male
20%
Female
10%
0%
REARR
RECON
RENPS
RPWOW
REARR: Rearrested (recidivated)
RECON: Reconvicted
RENPS: Returned to prison with a new sentence
RPWOW: Returned to prison with or without a new sentence
15
Property Offense Category by
Recidivism Status by Gender
50%
40%
30%
Male
Female
20%
10%
0%
REARR
RECON
RENPS
RPWOW
REARR: Rearrested (recidivated)
RECON: Reconvicted
RENPS: Returned to prison with a new sentence
RPWOW: Returned to prison with or without a new sentence
16
Drug Offense Category by
Recidivism Status by Gender
50%
40%
30%
Male
Female
20%
10%
0%
REARR
RECON
RENPS
RPWOW
REARR: Rearrested (recidivated)
RECON: Reconvicted
RENPS: Returned to prison with a new sentence
RPWOW: Returned to prison with or without a new sentence
17
Public-order Offense Category
by Recidivism Status by Gender
50%
40%
30%
Male
Female
20%
10%
0%
REARR
RECON
RENPS
REARR: Rearrested (recidivated)
RECON: Reconvicted
RENPS: Returned to prison with a new sentence
RPWOW: Returned to prison with or without a new sentence
RPWOW
18
Other Offense Category by
Recidivism Status by Gender
50.0%
40.0%
30.0%
Male
Female
20.0%
10.0%
0.0%
REARR
RECON
RENPS
REARR: Rearrested (recidivated)
RECON: Reconvicted
RENPS: Returned to prison with a new sentence
RPWOW: Returned to prison with or without a new sentence
RPWOW
19
Rearrest Rates of Female and All
Prisoners by Time after Release
Cumulative Percent Rearrested
100
90
80
70
60
Female
All
50
40
30
20
10
0
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
Time to Rearrest
3 Years
20
Cumulative Percent Reconvicted
Reconviction of Female and All
Prisoners by Time after Release
50
45
40
35
30
Female
All
25
20
15
10
5
0
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
Time to Reconviction
3 Years
21
Cumulative Percent Returned to Prison
with a New Sentence
Return to Prison of Female and All
Prisoners by Time after Release
50
45
40
35
30
Female
All
25
20
15
10
5
0
6 Months
1 Year
2 Years
3 Years
Time to Return to Prison with a New Sentence
22
Time to Rearrest for Females
1
Violent
Property
Trafficking
Possession
Disorder
Other
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
Days since Release
10
80
96
0
84
0
72
0
60
0
48
0
36
0
24
0
12
0
0
0
Proporion surviving
0.9
Variables in the
Equation
black
273.3
hispanic
22.6
sentence 144.6
age rlse
647.1
# priors 2259.9
time serve 36.0
violent first 41.8
drug first
63.1
23
Type of Rearrest for Females
Public
Order
11%
Other
4%
None
43%
Drugs
17%
Property
20%
Violent
5%
24
Mean Number of Offenses
Criminal Career Patterns
for Females
4
3.5
3
2.5
2
Before
After
1.5
1
0.5
0
Violent Property
Drugs
Public
Disorder
Other
25
% of Career
Career Offense Types
for Females
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
Violent
Property
Drug
Trafficking
Drug
Possession
Public
Disorder
Other
26
Preliminary Findings on Female
Recidivism and Specialization
Three strongest predictors
Number of prior arrests
Age at release
African-American race
Drug and property offenders more likely than
violent offenders to be re-arrested
High proportion of career offenses same type
Over half of property offenders repeat
About one third for violent or drug offenses
27
Policy Implications
Male violent offenders pose greatest risk
Need
for community reinvestment initiatives
to reverse socioeconomic risk factors
Female property and drug offenders
highest rates of recidivism
Community-based
treatment may be more
appropriate than prison
Re-entry should focus on drug treatment,
stable housing, wraparound services
28
California Prisons
versus Other States
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
Rearrested
Reconvicted
California
Prison from
New Crime
New York
Prison from
Technical
Violation
Return to
Prison
Texas
Source: Fischer (2005) UCI Center for Evidence Based Corrections Bulletin 1(1)
29
California Recidivism Has
Different Policy Implications
Fischer’s analysis controls for background
Rearrest
not higher in CA compared to FL
Reconviction lower in CA compared to NY
High rates of technical violations partially
explained by fact that nearly all CA prisoners
report to parole agents
Petersilia (2005) recommends reinstating
discretionary parole
Austin, Hardyman & Irwin (2002) suggest
reducing time on parole to 6 months and require
parole board guidelines based on risk and need
30