Transcript File
Drug Information
Resources Review
Jennifer L. Rodis, PharmD, BCPS
The Ohio State University College of
Pharmacy
October 25, 2011
Objectives
Review the differences between primary,
secondary, and tertiary resources
Discuss the value of each resources type
Provide a refresher on searching Pubmed
Types of Literature
Types of literature
3 main types of drug information literature
– Tertiary
Interpretation of primary data
– Secondary
No interpretation, just helps you find sources
– Primary
Original research & analysis
Real-life Research
Tertiary Literature
Summarizes and interprets the primary
literature
Information generally well accepted
Place to start for basic information and
guidance
Can inform your subsequent research
Tertiary Literature
Advantages
– Convenient, accessible
– Often available online
– Review process of information is already done
Disadvantages
– Lag time
– Not as complete
– Author’s interpretation
Tertiary Literature
Textbooks
– Electronic also
Compendia
– Electronic also
Full-text computer databases (Internet)
Review articles
Tertiary Resources – Drug
Databases
Online
– Lexi Comp CRL
– MICROMEDEX
– Drug Facts and Comparisons
– MD Consult
– AHFS Drug Information
– Epocrates
Print
– PDR (Physician’s Desk Reference)
Tertiary Resources - Books
Print Books
– Remington’s
– Trissel’s (2 titles)
– Handbook of Nonprescription Drugs
– Redbook
– Drugs in Pregnancy & Lactation (aka: Brigg’s)
– Martindale: The Complete Drug Reference
Tertiary Resources - Other
UpToDate
Pharmacist’s Letter
Natural Medicines Comprehensive Database
Ohio Administrative Code (pharmacy.ohio.gov)
FDA.gov (Orange Book, Drugs@FDA)
CDC.gov
Professional Organizations
– APhA’s MTM Central
Package Insert
Manufacturer web sites
Using Tertiary Literature
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Does author have expertise?
Is the information current?
Is the information supported with
citations?
Does the resource contain relevant
information?
Is the resource free of bias or errors?
Is it clear/concise/easy-to-use?
Secondary Literature
Guides you to the primary and tertiary
literature
Indexing
– Bibliographic info only
Abstracting
– Bibliographic citation plus brief summary of
article or resource
Almost all are electronic format
Secondary Literature
Advantages
– Simple search strategies
– Very current citation information
– Access point for tremendous amount of
primary sources
Disadvantages
– Understanding coverage of the database
– Tweaking search strategies unique to each
database
Secondary Resources
ClinAlert
EMBASE (Elsevier)
International Pharmaceutical Abstracts
(IPA)
Iowa Drug Information System (IDIS)
Journal Watch
Lexis-Nexis
MEDLINE / PubMed
Primary Literature
Primary research
– Journal articles that are:
Case reports
Drug studies
Original reports of data
– Meta-analysis?
– Unpublished studies
Primary Literature
Considerations
Evaluating the basics
– Peer-reviewed
– Journal reputation
– Source of funding
Digging deeper
– Study methodology
– Clinical relevance
– Patient populations
Primary Literature
Advantages
– Most current published source
– Tremendous range of information
– Personally assess utility/validity
Disadvantages
– Overwhelming volume
– Interpretation of results
– Not yet vetted by experts
Primary Literature
Peer-reviewed journals
– JAMA
– New England Journal of Medicine
– American Journal of Health-system Pharmacy
– Annals of Internal Medicine
Non-peer reviewed journals
– Supplements
– Pharmacy Today
What’s the difference?
Ease of Use
Tertiary
Secondary
Primary
What’s the difference?
Most Current
Primary
Secondary
Tertiary
Alternate Sources of DI
Internet, Listservs, and medical news
briefs
Local and national professional
organizations and meetings
Pharmaceutical manufacturers
Drug information and poison control
centers
Searching Strategies
Begin broad, then narrow your search
– Start with tertiary sources
Use “related articles”
– Bibliographies
– Secondary resource guides
Always be sure to assess most up to date
information available
– Primary sources
Searching Pubmed
Searching Strategies
1.
Develop focused question and break into parts
What is the question asking?
“Is peptic ulcer prevention with proton pump
inhibitors and NSAIDs dose-related?”
–
–
proton pump inhibitors, dose, non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents, prevention of peptic ulcer
disease
Other forms of the above words and phrases
Searching Strategies
Putting together an answerable question is
key to successful evidence-based medicine
practice
– Use PICO method
Patient or problem
Intervention
Comparative intervention
Outcome
Be Specific!
Example: PICO
What is the minimum
or maximum dose of
NSAIDs at which
Patient or problem
proton-pump
inhibitors are
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome
effective for peptic
ulcer disease
prophylaxis?
Searching Strategies
2.
Read up on the basics of the question
Start with tertiary resources for foundation
Build on information gathered from texts,
review articles, and drug databases with a
primary literature search
Searching Strategies
3.
Gather as many articles as possible for
all of the parts of the search
Use MeSH headings to help narrow or broaden
your search
MeSH = Medical Subject Headings
– Official indexing terms for MEDLINE
Searching Databases: Basic
Boolean
“AND”
– Combines 2 terms (shrinks search)
“OR”
– Gives database more choices (broadens search)
“NOT”
– Limits search (removes undesired terms)
Basic Boolean
Both words must be present in results
paroxetine AND suicide
Basic Boolean
Either word can be present in results
paroxetine OR suicide
Basic Boolean
The first but not the second term will be present in the results
paroxetine NOT suicide
Pubmed Search Example
What is the minimum or maximum dose of
NSAIDs at which proton-pump inhibitors are
effective for peptic ulcer disease prophylaxis?
Search keywords
Proton pump inhibitors and dose and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents
proton pump inhibitors and dose and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents and
prevention of peptic ulcer disease
MeSH term search: PPIs, NSAIDs, PUD
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19240698
Resources
Adapted from lectures by Bridget Protus, PharmD, CGP, MLS
delivered 1/2010.
Thrower MR. Literature retrieval and Finding Resources
Electronically. In: Felkey BG, Fox BI, Thrower MR. Health care
informatics: a skills-based resource. Washington DC: American
Pharmacists Association; 2005. p. 191-228.
West, PM. Literature evaluation. In: Pharmacotherapy self-
assessment program: science and practice of pharmacotherapy, 5th
ed. (PSAP V). Kansas City: American College of Clinical Pharmacy;
2005. p. 93-110.
Shields, KM. Drug information resources. In: Malone PM, Kier KL,
Stanovich JE. Drug information: a guide for pharmacists, 3rd ed.
New York: McGraw Hill; 2006. p.61-101.
Resources
Thrower MR. Literature retrieval and Finding Resources
Electronically. In: Felkey BG, Fox BI, Thrower MR.
Health care informatics: a skills-based resource.
Washington DC: American Pharmacists Association;
2005. p. 191-228.
West, PM. Literature evaluation. In: Pharmacotherapy
self-assessment program: science and practice of
pharmacotherapy I, II, III. Kansas City: American
College of Clinical Pharmacy; 2005. p. 93-5.