New tools and technologies: the way forward
Download
Report
Transcript New tools and technologies: the way forward
New tools and technologies:
the way forward
William Burman MD
Denver Public Health
Tuberculosis Trials Consortium
Presenter disclosures
Chair - Data Safety and Monitoring
Board for TMC207 studies
Tibotec pays my employer for my time
What does it take to control
TB?
Timely diagnosis – prevent morbidity,
mortality, and ongoing transmission
Infection control – hospitals, clinics
Drug-resistance testing – ensure correct
treatment
Adherence to multidrug therapy and caseholding – complete the treatment
Contact-tracing and treatment of contacts –
identify secondary cases, prevent active
disease
Current tools for TB control: United
States
Diagnosis: sputum smear and culture
Infection control: negative pressure rooms
Drug-resistance testing: culture-based
methods
Treatment regimens:
6 months for susceptible cases, 24 months for
MDR
Directly-observed therapy
Contact tracing: tuberculin skin test, chest Xray
Current tools for TB control: highburden, low-resource settings
Diagnosis: sputum smear
Infection control: none
Drug-resistance testing: none
Treatment regimens:
8 months for susceptible cases
MDR treatment usually not available
Increasing use of DOT
Contact tracing: not done
Sputum smear by HIV status
60
Percentage (%)
50
40
HIV positive
HIV negative
30
20
10
0
Negative
1+
2+
3+
Smear Status
Tubercle Lung Dis 1993;75:191-4
Diagnosis and management of children
with TB: high-burden settings
Priority: low (“not the source of ongoing
transmission, do OK anyway”)
Diagnosis: smear positive in < 10%
Drug-susceptibility testing: not available
Treatment
Inappropriate doses
Lack of child-friendly formulations – inexact
dosing (cut pills), extemporaneous
formulations with unproven PK
TB diagnosis and treatment – the
patient’s perspective (Zambia)
Average of 6.7 health encounters prior
to diagnosis of TB
63 days from first visit to diagnosis
Costs of “free TB care”
Time off work (46%) for an average of 48
days
Travel to appointments – 16% of monthly
income
Needham DM, et al. Health Policy 2004; 67: 93-106
Rural KwaZuluNatal-Tugela Ferry
•
KwaZuluNatal: Msinga, Tugela
Ferry
• 2,000 sq km rural district
• High rate of poverty,
unemployment
High incidence/prevalence TB
• TB incidence >1,054/100,000
• 70-90% % of TB cases HIV+
• High case fatality rate among
HIV+ (40% before ARVs)
High prevalence of HIV
•
25-40% in antenatal attendees
G Friedland 2007
1539 Patients
with Isolates sent
544 patients
Culture-Positive for M.tb
323 (59%)
Not Resistant
to both Isoniazid & Rifampicin
221 (41%)
Resistant to INH & Rifampin
(MDR TB)
128 cases of MDR TB
In US in 2004
53
(10% Culture-Positive)
Resistant to all tested drugs
(XDR TB)
Lancet 2006 Nov 4;368:1575-80
Survival of 654 patients with drug-resistant
TB, from the time of sputum collection
Most patients died before initial results of
the culture were available
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 181: 80-86
Prevalence of MDR-TB in Africa over time:
2004, 2008, and current estimate
Orange: > 2% MDR among all TB cases
Emerg Infect Dis 2008; 14: 1345-52
How did this happen?
Highly-susceptible population – HIV
Late diagnosis
Little, if any infection control measures
Lack of drug-susceptibility testing (“not a
problem in Africa”)
Overwhelmed treatment programs – hard to
assure DOT, treatment completion
No contact tracing
How did this happen?
Highly-susceptible population – HIV
Late diagnosis
Little, if any infection control measures
Lack of drug-susceptibility testing (“not a
problem in Africa”)
Overwhelmed treatment programs – hard to
assure DOT, treatment completion
No contact tracing
Predictable that MDR-TB emerged in sub-Saharan Africa;
sobering how long it took to be recognized
What do we need to restore the
momentum in TB control?
Diagnosis: point-of-care test that is highly
sensitive (HIV, children) and specific
Drug susceptibility testing: 1-day test suitable
for district hospitals
Treatment
1-2 month regimens for susceptible TB
6 month, well-tolerated regimens for MDR
Validated pediatric dosing, child-friendly
formulations
What do we need to restore the
momentum in TB control? II
Infection control in high-burden settings
Better vaccine
Political will and funding to make new
tools available where needed
Prospects for new tools for TB control
PCR-based detection and drugresistance testing (GeneXpert)
Sensitivity and specificity of
GeneXpert system (n = 1730)
Detection of M. tuberculosis (1 specimen)
Sensitivity
Smear-positive: 98%
Smear-negative: 73% (3 specimens: 90%)
Specificity – 99%
Detection of RIF-resistance
Sensitivity: 98%
Specificity: 98%
Boehme C, et al. N Engl J Med 2010; 363:1005-15
New diagnostic tests for TB
Latent TB
Interferon gamma release assays: more
sensitive and more specific
Active TB
More sensitive microscopy systems
Rapid culture systems (7-14 days)
Nucleic acid amplification-based tests
More sensitive (approaching culture) and more
specific than sputum smear
Challenges in the application of new
diagnostic tests
U.S.
Shrinking TB control budgets
Familiarity with old, “inexpensive” tests
High-burden settings
Technical demands of culture, current
nucleic acid amplification systems
Algorithms for targeting use of tests
Funding to support roll-out
Laboratory personnel
Tuberculosis drug development –
the Rip van Winkle disease
PZA
INH
Strep
Ethambutol
Rifampin
RPT
2010
1998
1968
1965
1956
1952
1944
Current options for improving TB
treatment
Fluoroquinolones
Enhanced dose rifamycins
Novel drugs – new mechanisms of action,
active against MDR / XDR (as well as drugsusceptible strains)
TMC207
OPC-67683 / PA824
SQ109
PNU100480
4 possible new drug classes
Effect of TMC207 vs. placebo (both with an
optomized background regimen) on sputum
culture conversion in patient with MDR-TB
9%
48%
P = 0.003
48%
(N = 44)
N Engl J Med 2009;33:1389-95
Prospects for improvements in TB
treatment – next decade
MDR-TB:
Drug susceptible TB
Reliable regimen of 12 months or less
duration (from 24 months)
Marked improvement in tolerability of
therapy
3-month regimen (from 6-9 months)
Latent TB
1-2 month regimen (from 9 months)
Challenges in improving TB
treatment
Clinical trials capacity – esp. pediatrics
U.S.
NIH is expanding involvement in TB trials
TB control program funding cuts
High-burden settings
Funding for Global Fund
Assuring appropriate use of new drugs –
prevent MDR 2.0
Combined formulations
TB vaccine development
BCG – most widely used vaccine in the
world
Marked variability in strains
Limited efficacy – esp. in high-burden
settings
Can cause disease in persons with HIV
New vaccines – in early clinical trials
Will this momentum in new tools for
TB control be sustained?
Incentives for developing products for
neglected diseases
Problems of using patent exclusivity
Monetary prize for major advance
Markets in emerging economies
Continued involvement by governments,
foundations, Public-Private Partnerships
Great needs – great opportunities
Major improvements in TB diagnosis
and treatment on the horizon
Major challenges to ensure that these
improvements are made available to TB
patients – in the U.S. and high-burden
settings
With recognition and political will, these
challenges can be met