Economic Growth and Welfare Systems

Download Report

Transcript Economic Growth and Welfare Systems

Prof. PASQUALE TRIDICO
Università Roma Tre
[email protected]
Two inputs, K, L
A production function Cobb-Douglas
Y= ๐น ๐พ, ๐ฟ = ๐พ โˆ ๐ฟ1โˆ’โˆ
0<โˆ<1
Constant return to scale (decreasing marginal return
for each factor)
๐น โ„Ž๐พ, โ„Ž๐ฟ = โ„Ž๐น(K,L)=hY
๐น ๐พ/๐ฟ, ๐ฟ/๐ฟ = ๐น/๐ฟ(K/L,L/L)=y=๐น(๐‘˜)
The Cobb-Douglas has constant returns to scale; if you
double (halve) the amount of each input, you double
(halve) output .
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
Substitubility between K and L
Variation of different combinations of K and L
I depends on i
The hedge knife (Harrod instability) is solved
through the variation of v= K/Y allowed for
by prices flexibility (prices of factors)
๏ฝ
no government purchase of goods and
services:
Y = C + I for each t
๏ฝ
Hence saving S equals gross investment I
Y- C = S = I for each t
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
Hp: the number of workers growth at the
same rate of pop growth
๐ฟ๐‘ก = ๐ฟ0๐‘’ ๐‘›๐‘ก
Population growth and work force growth
exhibit exponential growth:
๐ฟ๐‘ก
๏ฝ
๐ฟ๐‘ก
=๐‘›
๏ฝ
Output depends on K and L
๐พ = ๐ผ โˆ’ ๐›ฟ๐พ = ๐‘ ๐‘Œ โˆ’ ๐›ฟ๐พ
๏ฝ ๐พ ๐‘–๐‘  ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐‘โ„Ž๐‘Ž๐‘›๐‘”๐‘’ ๐‘–๐‘› ๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘๐‘–๐‘ก๐‘Ž๐‘™ ๐‘ ๐‘ก๐‘œ๐‘๐‘˜ ๐‘œ๐‘ฃ๐‘’๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ก๐‘–๐‘š๐‘’
๏ฝ Income is equal to output
๏ฝ Individuals save always the same fraction
(with s<1, > 0 of Y)
๏ฝ Aggregate saving = to gross I
sY=S=I
K depreciates over time (with ๐›ฟ > 0, < 1 ๐‘œ๐‘“ ๐พ)
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
Divide ๐พ = ๐ผ โˆ’ ๐›ฟ๐พ = ๐‘ ๐‘Œ โˆ’ ๐›ฟ๐พ by K
๐พ
๏ฝ
๐พ
=
๐‘Œ
๐‘ 
๐พ
โˆ’
๐พ
๐›ฟ
๐พ
=
๐‘Œ
๐‘ 
๐พ
โˆ’๐›ฟ
K
๏€ฝk
L
๏ƒ—
๏ƒ—
๏ƒ—
K
L
k
if
๏€ฝ ๏‚ฎ ๏€ฝ0
K
L
k
๏ƒ—
๏ƒ—
๏ƒ—
K
L
k
if
๏€พ ๏‚ฎ ๏€พ0
K
L
k
๏ƒ—
๏ƒ—
๏ƒ—
K
L
k
if
๏€ผ ๏‚ฎ ๏€ผ0
K
L
k
โ€ข
โ€ข
perfect competition
Price takers firms
Y ๏€ฝ F ( K , L) ๏€ฝ K ๏ก L1๏€ญ๏ก
Profit maximizations solve the following
problem
Max F(K,L)โˆ’๐‘Ÿ๐พ โˆ’ ๐‘ค๐ฟ
K,L
Y
๏‚ถF
๏€ฝ 1๏€ญ๏ก
w๏€ฝ
L
๏‚ถL
Y
๏‚ถF
๏€ฝ๏ก
r ๏€ฝ
K
๏‚ถK
the share of Y for Labour is
L
1๏€ญ๏ก ๏€ฝ w
Y
the share of Y for Kapital is
K
๏ก ๏€ฝr
Y
๏ก
Y 1 ๏ก 1๏€ญ๏ก
K๏ก ๏ƒฆ K ๏ƒถ
๏ก 1๏€ญ๏ก ๏€ญ1
๏ก ๏€ญ๏ก
y๏€ฝ ๏€ฝ K L ๏€ฝ K L
๏€ฝ K L ๏€ฝ ๏ก ๏€ฝ ๏ƒง ๏ƒท ๏€ฝ k๏ก
L L
L
๏ƒจL๏ƒธ
K
k๏€ฝ
L
๏ก ๏€ผ1
๏€จ
๏€ฉ ๏€จ
๏€ฉ
y ๏€ฝ k๏ก
First key equation of Solow
๐‘ฆ = ๐‘˜ โˆ (GDP per capita)
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๐พ = ๐‘ ๐‘Œ โˆ’ ๐›ฟ๐พ * (capital accumulation equation)
About how capital accumulates
The change of capital stock is equal to the
amount of gross investment sY less the amount
of depreciation ๐›ฟK
Workers/consumers save a constant fraction s of
Y
๐›ฟ=5% (for instance)
๐‘‘๐พ
๐‘‘๐‘ก
๐พ=
๐พ ๐‘–๐‘›๐‘‘๐‘–๐‘๐‘Ž๐‘ก๐‘’ ๐‘กโ„Ž๐‘’ ๐‘‘๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘–๐‘ฃ๐‘Ž๐‘ก๐‘–๐‘ฃ๐‘’ ๐‘ค๐‘–๐‘กโ„Ž ๐‘Ÿ๐‘’๐‘ ๐‘๐‘’๐‘๐‘ก ๐‘ก๐‘œ ๐‘ก๐‘–๐‘š๐‘’,
๐‘œ๐‘Ÿ ๐‘ ๐‘–๐‘š๐‘๐‘™๐‘ฆ, ๐พ๐‘ก+1 โˆ’ ๐พ๐‘ก
K
๏€ฝk
L
๏ƒ—
.
.
k
K L
๏€ฝ
๏€ญ
k
K L
.
.
K
Y
L
from* ๏‚ฎ
๏€ฝs
๏€ญ ๏ค ; and
๏€ฝn
K
K
L
๏ƒ—
k
Y
y
๏€ฝs
๏€ญ๏ค ๏€ญ n ๏€ฝ s ๏€ญ๏ค ๏€ญ n
k
K
k
.
k ๏€ฝ sy ๏€ญ ( n ๏€ซ ๏ค ) k
the second fundamental equation of Solow
.
k ๏€ฝ sy ๏€ญ (n ๏€ซ ๏ค )k
The equation says that change in k per
worker is determined by
1. I per workers sy which increases k
2. Depreciation which decreases K
3. And population growth n which decreases k
๏ฝ
In each period there are nL new workers. If
there were no new investments, capital per
worker would decline because of the increase
of labour force (by n)
y๏€ฝk
.
๏ก
.
k ๏€ฝ sy ๏€ญ ( n ๏€ซ ๏ค ) k
.
k ๏€ฝ sy ๏€ญ (n ๏€ซ ๏ค )k
n
.
if : k ๏€ผ k * ๏‚ฎ sy ๏€พ (n ๏€ซ ๏ค )k ๏‚ฎ k ๏€พ 0
.
if : k ๏€พ k * ๏‚ฎ sy ๏€ผ (n ๏€ซ ๏ค )k ๏‚ฎ k ๏€ผ 0
is the line where investment per worker is constant
It represents both pop growth n and depreciation, as a fraction of that K
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
For each value of K, n indicates how much of
Investment is needed in order to keep K/L
constant
Hence n is the rate of growth g of equilibrium
The system tends towards n = g
On the left of k*, I are more of what is
necessary in order to keep K/L constant ๏ƒ 
K/L > L/L (n) ๏ƒ  kโ†‘
On the right of k*, I are insufficient to keep
K/L constant ๏ƒ  K/L < L/L (n) ๏ƒ kโ†“
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
Between k0 and before k* we speak about
capital deepening: the capital per worker
ratio increases
When capital per worker ratio is zero (it does
not increases) we speak about capital
widening (Capital is growing, but because of
popultaion growth K/L is constant
๏ฝ
This is the solution of the Solow model in general
terms.
๏ฝ
If k0 (the initial level of K per worker), ฮฑ, s, n and
depreciation of capital, are known, one can
establishes whether capital per worker will grow
or not (so the economy will grow or not).
๏ฝ
This has also very important policy implications
as far as policy can influence s (and I), n and the
other parameters
๏ฝ
Is that path of growth that allows for s๏ƒ K
which represents the minimum share of total
outcome and also the max possible
consumption, or in another way: is the rate of
savings which maximizes steady state level of
growth and consumption
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
The SS rises from k* to k** and the economy will be
richer
Before the new capital/worker ratio capital deepening
occurs, and output per worker grows untill the
economy reaches the new (higher) rate of steady
state
In k** income will be higher
At the current value of capital stock k* investment per
worker now (after the increase of s) exceeds the
ammount required to keep the capital labour ratio
constant and therefore a process of capital deepening
restarts and the economy grows (GDP per capita grows)
untill when sy reaches the new steady states in K** and
is equal to n+d line
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
๏ฝ
At the current value of capital stock k* investment
per worker is now (after the increase of n) no
longer high enough to keep the capital labour ratio
constant in the face of a rising in the population.
Therefore the capital labour ratio begins to fall
untill the point at which investment (sy) is equal to
the new n+depreciation in k**
At this point the economy has less capital per
worker than before and is therefore poorer.
Per capita output (and icome) is lower after the
increase of n
The SS decreases from k* to k** and the economy
will be poorer