Transcript Source
Regional Operational Programme under Objective 1 of Cohesion Policy case of Pomorskie Region in Poland Stanislaw Bienias on behalf of Pomorskie Region Brussels, 21 October 2011 Pomorskie from the EU perspective Pomorskie (EU = 100) Indicator 2005 GDP per capita (2005, 2008) Employment rate (2005, 2009) Productivity (2005, 2008) 50,2% 53,0% 82,6% 92,5% 65,1% 66,0% Source: GUS, Eurostat (2005, 2007, 2008, 2009) Source: Fifth report on economic, social and territorial cohesion, 2010 Last available Pomorskie ROP in general Total budget (EUR) 1 292 463 495 ERDF contribution (EUR) 938 379 686 % ERDF allocation Priority Axes 19,1% SME development and innovation 5,5% Knowledge society Priority Axes 10 Measures 31 Categories of intervention 38 Selected projects 1470 Committed funds 96% Payments to beneficiaries 39% No of indicators 110 output result impact ROP vs. regional GDP (yearly average) 47 34 29 0,9% Urban and metropolitan functions 17,4% Regional transport system 23,7% The environment and environment friendly energy 6,0% Tourism and cultural heritage 4,7% Health protection and rescue service system 3,8% 13,2% Local basic infrastructure Local social infrastructure and civil initiatives 3,8% Technical assistance 2,8% TOTAL 100.0% Pomorskie ROP in new logical framework (1) Example for SME support (1) What do you want to change? (result) Priority: More SMEs generating long-term jobs Indicators Example of result indicator Example of output indicators Name: Growth of employment in SME sector (%) Name: Number of SMEs receiving financial support Definition: Available (provided by NSO) Definition: see above Sources: NSO Source: MA Baseline: available Target: to be determined Pomorskie ROP in new logical framework (1) Example for SME support (2) Priority: More SMEs generating long-term jobs • low levels of employment persists in the regional labour market both compared with the EU and Poland • SMEs play a key role in the region’s economy • development potential of many SMEs is limited due to visible barriers in access to capital Pomorskie ROP in new logical framework (2) Example for transport system (1) What do you want to change? (result) Priority: Increased capacity of regional passenger railway system Indicators Example of result indicator Example of output indicators Name: Growing number of users in regional railway transport (%) Name: Total length of reconstructed or upgraded lines (km) Definition: to be clarified Definition: determined by law Source: own research Source: beneficiaries Baseline: not available (yet) Target: 170 km Pomorskie ROP in new logical framework (2) Example for transport system (2) Priority: Increased capacity of regional passenger railway system • low level of integration of the public transport systems • rail services are not competitive to other means of transport (low level of regional railway network, long travel times and poor accessibility of some parts of the region to economic centres) • increasing of the mobility is a key prerequisite for improved conditions on labour market as well as in education sector Conclusions and questions after the exercise CONCLUSIONS • Current shape of the Pomorskie ROP could be hardly transformed by using „new-logic-of-indicators” approach • The bigger programme the harder this new approach is implementable – „point of departure” of different regions / programmes will be different and it should be taken into account in new approach • New approach requires extremely strategic choices when programming – ultra-focused approach could be objectively and politically questioned • Different focus of programmes creates problems with aggregated results QUESTIONS • Are public (regional) statistics ready to support the new approach? • How to display a value added of the new approach for decision-makers? Thank you Stanislaw Bienias on behalf of Pomorskie Region, Poland