مشروع المنتجات المالية في الفقه الإسلام
Download
Report
Transcript مشروع المنتجات المالية في الفقه الإسلام
For-profit domain
Non-profit domain
A balanced approach
Like a bird, an economy needs the two
sectors to fly
Zakat
Nafaqat
Sharing in times of necessity, starvation, or
hardship
Obligatory donation
Applies to idle money (not used for one
year)
Measure against hoarding
Hoarding and the current financial crisis?
Obligatory spending for designated relatives
Parents, family, close relatives
Subject to need
Safety net
Distribution of wealth
Happiness cannot be achieved by one
domain
Balance allows both to flourish and thrive
Prohibition of israf
Prohibition of usury or riba
Prohibition of gharar or wagering
Over-spending or over-utilization of
resources
In consumption:
extravagant spending
Conspicuous consumption and status games
In investment:
Greed—”irrational exuberance”
Bubbles => crashes
Wealth preservation is an essential objective
of Shari’ah
Israf violates preservation of wealth
Results: pollution, global warming,
depletion of resources
Essence of economics is to avoid israf
Riba or usury: any stipulated addition over a
loan
Includes both simple and compound
interest
Prohibited by all divine religions as well as
Buddhism
Two-thirds of world population subscribe to
this belief
Debt grows faster than wealth
Debt cannot be paid except with new debt
Debt burden destroys the economy
1 pence borrowed
at 4% in 1 AD
In 1750 debt equals weight
of the globe of gold
In 1990 it equals 8190 globes!
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
1975
1980
M2
1985
1990
GDP
1995
2000
Domestic debt
2005
2007
Average growth annual rate:
Debt: 39%,
GDP: 21%,
M2: 19%
Debt-GDP ratio: 1.3 to 2.2
Debt-M2 ratio: 2.2 to 4.2
Debt
Wealth
Inverted pyramid is not sustainable
Crashes needed to “clean up” the system
Then debts start to accumulate again faster
than wealth
Recurrent crashes
Very costly to maintain the system
Theory: Intertemporal Budget Constraint:
The present value of debt go to zero
Prevents Ponzi financing
Reality: E.U. requirements:
Deficit < 3% of GDP
Debt < 60% of GDP
Problem: Need to govern debt from the
ground-up
Debt creation is integrated with wealth
creation
For-profit debt must be contractually
embedded in real transactions
Islamic modes of finance:
Deferred sale; salam; leasing;
Sale of a good for a deferred price
Price includes markup
Time value is paired with real value
Murabaha: Financing deferred sale
Opposite of deferred sale
Price is spot; good is deferred
Time-value is reflected in lower price
Debt
Wealth
Gharar is risk with delusion or deception
Risk: likelihood of loss or failure
Two types of gharar:
Degree of risk
Form of contract
Ex ante measure
Gharar if Prob (loss) ≥ Prob (gain)
Example: Lottery
Where is delusion?
Luck vs. skill
Low likelihood of success means low skill
The need for “feasibility studies”
Ex post measure
Gharar if it is a zero-sum game
Examples:
Gambling
Sale of a lost car
Sale of a closed box
Why play a zero-sum game?
(A , B)
(+ , −)
(− , +)
A zero-sum game cannot be played if the
two parties know in advance who will win
Steps:
Select first outcome
If one player refuses to play, it is a zero-sum
outcome
Repeat with other outcomes
If all outcomes are zero-sum, the whole game
becomes a zero-sum game
Zero-sum
Positive-sum
Mixed
One party gains only if the other does
Interests are always aligned
(A , B)
(+ , +)
(− , −)
Contains zero-sum and positive-sum
outcomes
If the zero-sum outcome is dominant, it is
excessive gharar
If not, it is minor gharar
Game acceptable if the positive-sum
outcome is dominant
(Land lord , Farmer)
(+ , +)
(+ , −)
Zero-sum games are always high risk
High risk deals invite zero-sum games
High-risk: speculation
Zero-sum: gambling
Riba: separates time from real transactions
Gharar: separates risk from real transactions
Time and risk are two sides of the same coin
Riba implies gharar and vise versa
Both allow obligations to grow independent
or real wealth => inverted pyramid
Universal principles
Economic ground
Balanced approach