International Investment
Download
Report
Transcript International Investment
FIN 408
International Investment
Factors affecting Risk and Return
Size and Number of International Open-end Funds
Global market Correlations
Correlation over time - constant vs. nonconstant
Implications on portfolio diversification
Gains from International Diversification.
1
Factors Affecting Risk and Return
Returns
World Bank projects that 70% of the growth of
the world’s real GDP during the next 20 years
will come from developing economies in Asia,
Latin America, Eastern Europe and Africa
January 1987 to may 1993: Stock market
growth in Turkey 637%; Argentina 1,374%;
Mexico 960% (Source: Investor’s Guide to
Emerging Markets).
2
Factors Affecting Risk and Return
There are more people abroad whose incomes are
growing faster (China , India, for example)
Vast need for infrastructure and technology
investment in the emerging economies
Risks Faced by International Fund Managers
Currency Risk- pegged to US $, mitigates risk if
invested in single country; hedge currency exposure.
Political Risk - nationalization
Inadequate Accounting
Liquidity problems
3
Factors Affecting Risk and Return
Legal and Regulatory Risk
Higher costs - market less efficient, higher
transaction cost, fund manager incur additional
travel costs etc.,
Size and Number of International Open-end Funds
1990-99: Global/International Mutual Funds
assets grew from $46.2b to $501.4b
Cash flow into international funds in 2000 was
$49.9b.
4
Why Invest in International Funds
Why Invest in International Funds?
Diversification benefits;
Fund managers may earn abnormally high
returns because of market inefficiency;
5
Global Market Correlations
Global market Correlations
Correlation over time - constant vs. nonconstant;
Correlations between developed markets;
Correlations between emerging markets;
Implications on portfolio diversification
6
Global Market Correlations
Correlations / Diversifications with ECM:
1985-95: Correlation = .34
ECM had higher return and higher risk than
S&P 500
S&P 500 is not on the efficient frontier
Minimum Variance Portfolio contained
20% ECM
7
Global Market Correlations
1975-95: Correlation = .27
ECM had lower return but higher risk than S&P
500
Minimum Variance Portfolio contained 30% ECM
1990-95: Correlation = .41
ECM had lower return but higher risk than S&P
500
Minimum Variance Portfolio contained 10% ECM
8
Characteristics of ECM
Characteristics of Developing Countries:
1995 Annual per capita GDP less than $8,995
85% of wold population
20% of world GDP
11% of world Stock Market Capitalization
Relative Size of Emerging Capital Markets
(ECM):
1985 $167.7B
1995 $1.9T
9
Characteristics of ECM
During the same time period, the growth in
developed countries:
1985 $4.5 T
1995 $15.9T
Investors are attracted to ECM because of:
Return potentials
Diversification potentials
Performance of ECM:
ECM are characterized by high risk, high return
and diversification benefits.
10
Gains from International
Diversification
Gains from International Diversification.
Rationale: international equity market has
higher E(R) than the US market and can
substantially diversify US portfolio.
Asset pricing models do not argue that risk
factors have geographically different E(R).
In the US market, value and size explain the
difference in E(R) across equity portfolio
International value stocks and small stocks
diversify US portfolio more than EAFE.
11
Gains from International
Diversification
Performance of International Open-end
Funds
Standard Deviation of Monthly Returns;
Sharpe Ratio for International Funds;
Jensen’s Alpha for International Funds.
Analyze performance of Well-Diversified
Funds.
12
Conclusions
Conclusions:
ECMs are an asset class of growing importance
Historical performance is inconsistent with
common assertion that ECMs always produce
higher average returns.
ECMs offers diversification opportunities to
global investors.
Optimal asset allocation changes from period to
period.
13
Conclusions
Future studies should examine:
Economic reforms and performance of ECMs
Concentration of wealth in the hands of a small
number of families/holding companies.
Advantages and disadvantages of these
organizational structure?.
Corporate financial policies of firms and their
effects on market valuation.
14