Sample title filled in here
Download
Report
Transcript Sample title filled in here
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Principles and Issues Relating to the
Interconnection of Wind Power
Zhenyu Fan & Johan Enslin
Power System Conference,
Clemson, South Carolina,
March 8-11, 2005
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
3801 Lake Boone Trail, Suit 200
Raleigh, NC 27607
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Overview:
Study Background
Key Issues
Objectives & Scope
Case Studies
Summary
2
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Wind Power is growing!
1.
Germany: 12,001 MW
2.
Spain: 4830 MW
3.
US: 4275 MW
4.
Denmark: 2880 MW
5.
India: 1702 MW
Source: AWEA’s Global Market Report
3
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Table 1: Example of wind systems and installed penetration levels
Region
4
Peak Load
MW
Installed Wind
MW
Penetration
Denmark
5,000
3,100
62%
Germany
77,000
14,600
19%
Spain
36,000
6,200
17 %
The Netherlands
14,000
1,000
7%
Continental USA
808,000
6,740
0.8%
Texas
63,000
1,288
2%
New Mexico
1,500
265
17%
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Wind Resource in the USA
5
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Wind Power installed in US
6
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Wind Power Interconnection Studies
Interconnection procedures are not uniform
In general, interconnection procedures require:
to apply for a queue position;
system feasibility, system impact, and facilities studies;
interconnection and construction agreements;
7
construction of interconnection facilities, and network
upgrades if required.
FERC governs the generation interconnection process
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Interconnected Issues:
8
Power Flow
Short Circuit
Transient Stability
Electromagnetic Transient
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Interconnected Issues (Cont.):
Protection
Power
Leveling and Energy
Balancing
Power
9
Quality
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Network Interface Options
AC
A)AC
B)C)-
Lo
AC
AC
D)-
Q
Co
R
Q and P
C3
AC
AC
Damper
SVC
AC
AC
AC
AC
Wind Farm
Storage
Offshore grid
• A – Direct link, no compensation
10
• B – SVC, reactive power, voltage
• C – STATCOM, added power quality
• D – STATCOM with battery, added power balance, trading, UPS,
Black-start, etc.
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Case Studies:
California ISO System
Dutch Project
11
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
California ISO System:
12
CA Wind Resources
Areas designated "Good" are
roughly equivalent to an
estimated mean annual power at
10 meter height of 200
Watts/square meter to 300 W/m2
and "Excellent" to above 300
W/M2.
In the year 2000, wind energy in
California produced 3,604 million
kilowatt-hours of electricity, about
1.27 percent of the state's total
electricity. That's more than
enough to light a city the size of
San Francisco.
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
California ISO System:
13
CA Electricity Market
The CA ISO 2004 Summer peak
load is 44,422 MW with a
minimum projected planning
reserve of 16.4% and a
corresponding operating reserve
of 2,750 MW. Approximately
32,700 MW are thermal units,
2,600 MW are wind with the
remaining 18,700 MW consisting
of a mix of hydro, pumped
storage and solar.
The 2004 base scenario forecast
wind capacity for California
during summer peaks is only 235
MW (9.0% of the installed wind
capacity).
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Wind Power Operating Reserve and
Regulation Impact
14
Load forecasting error affects operating reserves while shortterm fluctuations in load affect regulation
Forecasting errors should be considered in combination
Geographical dispersion of wind resources tend to reduce the
amount of incremental load following requirements
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Wind Power Impact on Reliability and
System Operation
15
Hydro-power resources can be used for power balancing
wind power plants,
Thermal units on the system would still be used for operating
reserves.
System reliability and load following capability will not be
affected significantly by the addition of a significant amount of
wind generation.
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Wind Power Impact on Generation
16
The decision to build a wind plant depends on many factors.
Capacity factor of CA ISO is 9% on an annual basis, new
wind project are likely to have capacity factors in the 35-40%
range.
The addition of large amounts of wind generation to a system
would have some economic and physical impact on merchant
plants in the medium to long run.
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Netherlands Project
Connection
Points
Wind Park
17
Major Dutch HV Network Upgrades for interconnection of
a 6,000 MW offshore wind park in the North Sea
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Offshore Wind Energy In Netherlands
12% of energy within EU should be provided by
renewables by the year 2010, with a possible
installed wind capacity of at least 40 GW
6000 MW by 2020 wind power studies
An energy storage system integrated with high
power electronics can mitigate interconnection
problems
18
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Storage Options for 6 GW Wind Farm
Dimensioning Flow-battery
Energy
62004 MWh
VSC Interface
Power
2555 MW
Transformer
Electrolytic
Storage Tanks
Fuel-Cell Stacks
VSC Inverter
and Controller
Surface of Battery Plant for Wind Park (6000 MW):
• 792.000 m2 (e.g 990 x 800 m)
Based on Flow-battery technology
19
6,000 M€, 30 years NPV, 1x1 km size
Not feasible by factor 10 as a single solution
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Energy Storage
20
A 2500 MW battery plant will be required
Total capacity is 62 GWh
Based on the difference between low
and high APX-values, the profits of the
reduction of the number of start/stops,
and avoiding the investment cost of the
stabilization system, and avoiding of the
unbalance cost, the project becomes
feasible.
In this case, a seven- to eight-year
break-even can be achieved,
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Summary
21
Large-scale wind park requires a different integration
approach from those used for smaller wind farms.
Mitigation devices are needed for the interconnection
issues with distributed power
Key technologies can minimize the impact on the
network
Several functions should be integrated into the
functionality of the energy storage system
KEMA T&D CONSULTING
Thank You !
22