Transcript Document

Social & Emotional
Development
Chapter 10










Processes in Social
Behavior -Social Behavior
as Operant Interactions
:
Bert's Contingency:
Sees Ernie → "Hi Ernie" → E. smiles
→
R
→
S+r
( Setting Event = Walking along)
Ernie's Contingency:
"Hi Ernie“ → E smiles→ Bert Smiles
Sd
→
R
→
S+r
(Setting Event = In a good mood)
Sd
The Function of Social
Behavior
Phylogenic Contributions to
Social Development


Physical Characteristics
Social Reflexes
– Facial Expressions
– Reflexive Crying

Neonatal Imitation
Ontogenic Contributions






Social Behaviors
Reinforcement
Proximity
Attention
Affection
Observational Learning
Social Reinforcement


Secondary Reinforcers
Paired with Primary Reinforcers
Proximity

Reinforcer - The nearness of you
Attention

Mand for Mom
– Verbal behavior reinforced by mom doing
something

Ways of Reducing Mands for Attention
Ways of Reducing Mands for
Attention

DRO – Differential Reinforcement of Other behavior
– Incompatible response technique
– Strengthens more desirable behavior
– Doesn’t produced deprivation of reinforcer

Positive (Presentation) Punishment – Not
recommended
– Ethical? Escape

Negative Punishment (By Loss) (Weak if delayed)
– Loss of privileges
– Time-out
Affection

Usually reinforces desirable behavior
Observational Learning
Traditional Approached

Distinction between
– Learning
– Performance


Direct reinforcement affects
performance
Vicarious consequences affect learning
– Vicarious reinforcement
– Vicarious punishment
An Operant Approach to
Observational Learning

Generalized imitation
– Imitation (matching form of response) a response
class
– Class assembled because some (not all) matching
behaviors are reinforced
– Counterimitation – reinforced for different behavior
than model
– So called “vicarious reinforcement” is actually an
Sd cuing operant matching behavior


Observational Learning of
Respondents - Emotional
Behavior
Other’s emotional response serves as
UCS for emotional response (UCR)
Stimulus (NS) paired with other’s
emotional response (UCS) becomes CS
producing emotional response (CR)
Prosocial Transactions Intuitive Parenting






1. Creating and maintaining an awake state.
2. Presenting a simple structure of stimuli
and learning trials.
3. Providing a large number of repetitions of
trials.
4. Gradually ordering of tasks so that there
is increasing complexity.
5. Using adequate reinforcers.
6. Being sensitive to feedback signals
indicating the child's limits of tolerance.
Social Behaviors in Infancy








Attachment
Separation Protests
Touch
Fear
Social Referencing
Sibling Rivaly
Empathy
Morality
Attachment



Organized pattern of behavior directed
toward one or more individuals.
Result of phyologenic & ontogenic
factors
Ontogenic – reinforcement of proximity,
imitation, and identification behaviors16
Reinforcement of Separation
Protests





Loss of primary caregiver results in loss of
reinforcers– extinction burst
Study by Gewirtz & Pelaez-Nogueras
Baseline- noncontingent reinforcement—
protests were low
Contingent reinforcement by mothers of
protests – protests increase
Noncontingent (reversal) – Protest decrease
Social Referencing
Separation Protests
Gewirtz & Pelaez-Nogureras
(1996)
The Power of Touch
Touch-No Touch: (N=(8)
Syncrhronized Reinforcement
Fear of Dark
Fear of Strangers
Infant Carrying Positions

Facing Inward
Facing Outward
Morality



Direct Contingency-shaped behavior
Rule-governed behavior
Learns difference between
– Immediate direct consequences
– Remote, delayed, indirect consequences


Tracking – tracking or following actual
contingencies rather than just follow rules
Pliance – complying with the rules in spite of
discrepancies with actual contingencies.
Morality
Behavior-Analytic Approach




An increasingly sophisticated repertoire of
behaviors to further one’s long-term interests
based on predicted outcomes.
An organized system of rule governed
behavior that controls behavior patterns that
society considers “moral”.
Develops from the interaction of the child and
environment in active interaction.
Context is crucial
A Cognitive View of Morality
Kohlberg’s Theory


Moral Reasoning (Not necessarily behavior)
Level I – Preconventional Morality
– Stage 1) Tangible consequences
– Stage 2) Hedonistic get rewards/avoid pun

Level II - Conventional Morality
– Stage 3) Follows rules to get social approval
– Stage 4) Follow conventional rules to support
social order

Level III – Postconventional Morality
– Stage 5) Have a social contract to do what is right
– Stage 6) Universal principles of justice,
democracy, etc.
Taxonomy of Moral Rules
(Pelaez & Moreno)





Explicit vs. Implicit
Accurate vs. Inaccurate (false or
inconsistent)
Complex (multiple contingencies) vs.
Simple (single contingency)
Other vs. Self-Derived source
16 possible combinations.
Development of Rule
Compliance & Self-Instruction





1. Early – Parents prompt & reinforce compliance to
simple rules.
2. Generalized compliance (rule following becomes
response class).
3. Others (e.g., teachers, grandparents) add rules.
Child learns to discriminate which rules will have
consequences.
4. Adults prompt child to give own rules (selfinstruction).
5. Self-instruction generalizes to novel situations –
Generalized self-instruction.
Morality- Kohlberg
Morality – A Taxonomy