Transcript spinellochapter01

Chapter One
The Internet and Ethical Values
1
Laws vs.
Software Controlling Technology
• Attempting to control technology through law
and regulation has often been futile.
• Correcting technology with other technology
has been more effective.
• Ex. Laws suppressing pornography have been
rough to enforce but software that filters out
pornography has been more successful.
2
Larry Lessig’s Framework
• Four constraints that regulate our behavior
in real space: laws, norms, the market and
code / architecture
• Laws – rules imposed by the government
which are enforced by ex post (after the fact)
sanctions
– The complicated IRS tax code is a set of laws
that dictates how much we owe. If we break
these laws we are subject to fines / penalties.
3
Larry Lessig’s Framework
• Social Norms – expressions of the community.
Most have well defined sense of normalcy in
norms, standards and behavior.
– Cigar smokers are not welcome at most functions.
• The Market – prices set for goods, services or
labor.
– $3.95 for coffee and local coffee shop
• Architecture – physical constraints of our
behavior.
– A room without windows imposes certain constraints
4
because no one can see outside.
Real Life vs. Cyberspace
• Subject to the same four constraints
– Laws – provide copyright and patent protection
– Markets – advertisers gravitate towards more
popular web sites
– Architectural – software code such as programs and
protocols (constrain and control our activities). Ex.
Web sites demanding username/passwords and
software deployed to filter spam and certain email.
– Norms – Internet etiquette and social customs.
Flaming is a bad norm.
5
Ethics
• Intrinsic human goods and the moral choices
that realize those goods.
• There are basic human goods that contribute
to human well-being or human flourishing.
6
James Moor
• Moor’s list of core human goods (considered
thin) include:
– Life
– Happiness – pleasure and absence of pain
– Autonomy – goods that we need to complete our
projects (ability, security, knowledge, freedom,
opportunity, reason)
7
John Finnis
• Finnis’ version of human good (considered
thick) includes:
– Life
– Knowledge
– Play (and skillful work)
– Aesthetic experience
– Sociability
– Religion
– Practical reasonableness (includes autonomy)
• Participation in these goods allow us to achieve
genuine human flourishing
8
Both Moor and Finnis Believe
• Ultimate good, human flourishing of ourselves
and others should be our guidepost of value,
serving as a basis for crafting laws, developing
social institutions and regulating the Internet.
• Golden Rule (Matthew 7:12)
– “So whatever you wish that others would do to you,
do also to them”
• Immanual Kant stated “Act so that you treat
humanity always as an end and never as a
means”
9
Blocking Software
• Look at the last paragraph on page 6
• The author believes that those that write
programs or create laws should rely on ethics
as their guide.
• Code writers need to write in such a way that
preserves basic moral values such as
autonomy and privacy.
• Many feel technology is just a tool and it is up
to us whether this powerful tool is used for
good or ill purposes.
10
Technological Realism
• Two extremes:
– Up to us what happens
– Technology locks us into inescapable cage
• Technological Realism – acknowledges that
technology has reconfigured our political and
social reality and it does influence human
behavior in particular ways.
11
Two Broad Ethical Frameworks
• Teleological – rightness or wrongness of an
action depends on whether the goal or
desired end is achieved (look at the
consequences – maybe OK to lie). Sometimes
called consequentialism
• Deontological – is an action right or wrong.
Act out of obligation or duty. Prohibition
against harming the innocent.
12
Utilitarianism
• Teleological
• Most popular version of consequentialism
• Right course of action is to promote the
most general good
• The action is good if it produces the
greatest net benefits or lowest net cost
• See example on the bottom of page 11 - 13
13
Contractarianism
• Deontologic
• Rights-based
• Looks at moral issues from viewpoint of the
human rights that may be at stake
– Negative right – implies one is free from external
interference in one’s affairs (state can’t tap phones)
– Positive right – implies a requirement that the
holder of this right be provided with whatever one
needs to pursue legitimate interests (rights to
medical care and education)
14
Pluralism
• Deontologic
• Duty-based
• Actions only have moral worth when they are
done for the sake of duty
– Ex. If everyone would break promises there would
be no such thing as a promise.
– Consider this when looking at intellectual property
– Ask the question “What if everybody did what you
are doing?”
– Respect for other human beings
15
7 Moral Duties
1.
2.
3.
4.
Keep promises and tell truth (fidelity)
Right the wrongs you inflicted (reparation)
Distribute goods justly (justice)
Improve the lot of others with respect to virtue,
intelligence and happiness (beneficence)
5. Improve oneself with respect to virtue,
intelligence and happiness (self-improvement)
6. Exhibit gratitude when appropriate (gratitude)
7. Avoid injury to others (noninjury)
16
New Natural Law
• Good should be done and evil avoided
• This principle is too general.
17
Flaws in Moral Theories
• None are without flaws or contradictions
• 4 frameworks converge on same solutions but
suggest different solutions
• One must decide which framework they will
follow and “trump” the others
18
Principlism
• Popularized by Beauchamp and Childress
• “At first glance” one principle should be given
more weight than others but
• 4 principles are: autonomy, nonmaleficence,
beneficence and justice
19
Autonomy
• Is a necessary condition of moral responsibility
• Individuals shape their destiny according to
their notion of the best sort of life worth living
• If deprived of their autonomy, someone is not
treated with the respect they deserve.
20
Nonmaleficence
• Above all else – do no harm
21
Beneficence
• This is a positive duty
• We should act in such a way that we advance
the welfare of other people when we are able
to do so
22
Justice
• Similar cases should be treated in similar ways
• Fair treatment
23