Transcript Document

COMMUNICATION AND
ETHICS IN ORGANIZATIONS
Lecture 9a
Decision-Making and Ethics


Ethics: “a practice … by which we may reach
conclusions concerning the rightness or wrongness
of voluntary acts related to our [goal] last end” (AR)
Some that believe that ethics and economics cannot
be reconciled.


Success in business requires greed, deceit and
unfeeling ruthlessness…
Advancement … can come only from unsavory
actions...a truly good person cannot succeed in
business”
Decision-Making and Ethics
Others, however:

Business Ethics: “The study of how personal
moral norms apply to the activities and goals of
commercial enterprise. It is not a separate
moral standard, but the study of how the
business context poses its own unique
problems for the moral person to act as an
agent of this system”
THE CHALLENGER
DISASTER

January 1985, engineer Roger Boisjoly of Morton
Thiokol, a contractor to NASA, suspected trouble.



Begins tests: Do low temperatures negatively
affect the ability of the booster rocket’s O-rings to
seal?
March 1985, the tests confirmed danger.
June 1985, post-flight inspection of shuttle launch
revealed erosion of both primary and backup seals

Erosion that was close to being severe enough
to cause an explosion.
THE CHALLENGER
DISASTER

Talked with his immediate supervisor. Wrote a memo
to the vice president of engineering, discussing it first
with his immediate supervisor.


Boisjoly and others came up with recommendations that
included studying ways of improving the O-rings. Got a
team to study problem.
Day before the Challenger launch, the overnight
temperature to be eighteen degrees, much lower
than the fifty-three degree minimum recommended
by Morton Thiokol

Boisjoly and other O-ring team recommended not to
launch. Bob Lund, engineering vice president and Joe
Kilminster, recommended against the launch after having
met with Boisjoly and the O-ring team.
THE CHALLENGER DISASTER
Video Case Study
THE CHALLENGER DISASTER
THE CHALLENGER LAUNCH
73 SECONDS LATER
THE CHALLENGER DISASTER
INVESTIGATION


Morton Thiokol’s top managers reversed
their recommendation not to launch under
pressure from NASA, their customer.
NASA itself was under great pressure from
the White House to deliver a successful
launch.

Earlier in the year, the President had made a public
commitment to have the space shuttle fly on a
regular basis and he was upset by the number of
delays and scrubbed launches.
INVESTIGATION
CONCLUSION

Ensuing investigation
concluded…engineers at Morton
Thiokol were aware of the problem and
warned against launching, but
organizational and management
problems prevented their warning from
reaching NASA.
COMMUNICATION AND
ETHICS IN ORGANIZATIONS
Lecture 9b
ETHICAL PROBLEMS IN
ORGANIZATIONS

FREE SPEECH
KOHLBERG’S STAGES OF
MORAL GROWTH
PRECONVENTIONAL
STAGES
2. NAIVE EGOIST - INSTRUMENTAL
1. PUNISHMENT - OBEDIENCE
KOHLBERG’S STAGES OF
MORAL GROWTH

Level One - Stages One and Two





Punishment and Obedience


Child can respond to rules and social expectations in terms of
“good” - “bad”
Rules enforced for outside
Followed in terms of pain and pleasure resulting from actions
Self-interest is child’s concern
Little awareness of others’ needs and desires
Naively Egoistic and Instrumental


Recognizes others’ needs; defers to get what he/she wants
“Right” is a fair exchange satisfying individual
KOHLBERG’S STAGES OF
MORAL GROWTH
4. LAW AND ORDER
CONVENTIONAL
STAGES
PRECONVENTIONAL
STAGES
3. INTERPERSONAL CONCORDANCEDOING WHAT’S EXPECTED
2. NAIVE EGOIST - INSTRUMENTAL
1. PUNISHMENT - OBEDIENCE
KOHLBERG’S STAGES OF
MORAL GROWTH



Level Two - Stages Three and Four
 Responsiveness to one’s family, peers, nation is “right”
thing
 Regardless of consequences loyalty is highest value
 Subordinating individual needs to group
Interpersonal Concordance
 “Good boy-Good Girl” principle
 Good behavior is doing what’s expected - feeling loyalty,
affection trust
Law and Order Orientation
 Doing one’s duty, obey authority; maintain social order
 Fulfilling contracts; obligations and following rules defined
as good for society
 Recognizes differences between individual and society society first
KOHLBERG’S STAGES OF MORAL GROWTH
6. UNIVERSAL ETHICAL
PRINCIPLES
PRINCIPLED
STAGES
5. SOCIAL CONTRACT
4. LAW AND ORDER
CONVENTIONAL 3. INTERPERSONAL CONCORDANCESTAGES
DOING WHAT’S EXPECTED
PRECONVENTIONAL
STAGES
2. NAIVE EGOIST - INSTRUMENTAL
1. PUNISHMENT - OBEDIENCE
KOHLBERG’S STAGES OF
MORAL GROWTH

Stage 5 Social Contract





Realize others hold a variety of conflicting views
Use fair ways to reach agreement - consensus, contract,
due process
Social views and values are relative
Agreement is vital but certain “higher values” must always
be upheld
Stage 6 Universal Ethical Principles



Right action means following self-chosen principles:
comprehensive, universal, consistent
Not codes of specific behaviors (like 10 Commandments)
but universal moral principles - justice, equality of human
rights, respect for human dignity
Uses these principles to evaluate all other rules
MORAL AND COGNITIVE
DEVELOPMENT IN ADULTHOOD
DEVELOPMENT STAGE
COGNITIVE STYLE
INTERPERSONAL STYLE
3. CONCORDANCE
SIMPLICITY,
STEREOTYPES
4. LAW AND
ORDER
GENERALIZED
PERCEPTIONS
ASSERTION
5. SOCIAL
CONTRACT
COMPLEX
PATTERNS
MUTUALITY
6. UNIVERSAL
PRINCIPLES
SEES
CONTRADICTIONS
AND PARADOXES
LOYALTY,
CONFORMITY
EMPATHY,
GROWTH
RELATIONSHIPS
The Loss Ethical Focus and the
Ability to Talk About It

Enron




Rapid shift from pipelines to deal-making produced
enormous growth -- for a while
In the process, Enron lost a sense of core identity and
values (“lots of smart people, but no wise people”)
But also corrupt, manipulative leaders - lots of strategic
control talk
 Use of positive values to deceive
No room to talk about contradictions
 Raising concerns - personal weakness or disloyalty
The Loss Ethical Focus and the
Ability to Talk About It

Aggressive culture.

Brutal system inside the company in which each
employee was graded on their performance. And the
bottom ten percent were supposed to be fired.


“Rank and Yank”
Hostile, Warrior Culture

Everybody would battle each other inside of the company
so they could go outside into the marketplace and defeat
the competition by any means.