Moral Development - University of Puget Sound
Download
Report
Transcript Moral Development - University of Puget Sound
Moral Development
Moral Development
What is it?
Changes in the child’s:
Ability to distinguish right from wrong
The ability to act on this distinction
Components of Morality
Moral
Affect
Emotional
component- motivation
Positive outcome (pride)
Negative outcome (guilt, shame,
embarrassment)
Components of Morality (cont.)
Moral
Reasoning (cognition)
Thought
processes used for
decisions
↑ age, ↑ thoughts of right/wrong
Cog Dev Resist temptation
Components of Morality (cont)
Moral
Behavior
Behaving
consistently with beliefs
Gradual cookie from Jar?
Influenced by:
Right/wrong
Practicing inhibition of neg. impulses
Theories of Moral Development
Evolutionary/Biological
Benefits of pro-social & altruistic behavior
Piagetian Cog-Dev approach
Cog dev. Is the foundation of moral dev
Cog growth + social exp. = moral development
Both help understand rules, laws, & obligations
Piagetian stages
Cookie jar and cups
Premoral (3-4 yrs)
Little awareness of rules/make up own
Inconsistent response
Heteronomous (5-10 yrs)
Moral absolutes- Strong respect for rules (parents, God,
Law)
Consequences stronger than intent (15 cups is naughtier)
Punishment- spanking/go to room (not pay for cups)
E.g. Speeding with a 6 year old?
Piagetian stages
Autonomous (10-11 yrs)-moral dev complete
Social rules are more arbitrary
Attempted cookie theft is naughtier –due to intent
Reciprocal judgment- punishment fits crime
The “golden rule”
Clean up mess or no cookies for a week.
Kohlberg’s Theory (1963)
Refinement of Piaget
Cognitive development not enough
Exposure to moral conflicts (grey areas)
Heinz Dilemma
In Europe, a woman was near death (cancer). One drug
might save her life, but it was rare, and hard to obtain. A
local pharmacist had the drug (which cost $200 to
produce) and was selling it for $2000 for a dose that
might save the woman’s life. Her husband was able to
scrounge $1000 by borrowing from friends, but could
not scrape up rest of the money. The druggist refused
to sell the husband the drug at that price, or to accept a
payment plan. The husband then broke into the drug
store and stole the medicine.
SHOULD THE HUSBAND HAVE DONE THAT?
WHY?/WHY NOT?
Kohlberg’s Theory
Rationale for answers
Self-serving (pro-theft)
Obedience (anti-theft)
Kohlberg’s Theory
Level 1- Pre-conventional
Rules external to self (have to follow them)
What is right is what I can get away with or what satisfies
me
Stage 1- Punishment and obedience- It’s wrong because
I’ll get punished
Morality is based on consequence
Obey mostly to avoid punishment
Stage 2- Rewards- It’s wrong if I get caught
Conforms to gain reward
“It’s Heinz’s life he’s risking, he can do it if he wants”
“He’ll probably get caught, so it’s too much risk”
Altruism (due to benefits- what’s in it for me)
Kohlberg’s Theory
Level 2- Conventional
Goal is to obey rules- for approval or “because you’re
supposed to”- Promotes societal order
Stage 3- Good boy/good girl- It’s wrong when others
disapprove
Goal is to be thought of as a good person
Basis is person’s intent
Stage 4- Maintenance of social order- “It’s wrong because
it’s illegal”
Everyone is equal
Right is determined by legal authority
Rules & laws are good things (to keep public order)
Kohlberg’s Theory
Post-conventional
Right/wrong based on broader/abstract terms (principles
of justice)
Morally right ≠ legally right
Stage 5- Social contract- “It’s wrong because the
majority dictate it to be”- Our government
Laws may be bad
Social contracts if represent the will of the majority
Stage 6- Individual but universal ethical principles- “it’s
wrong because it is detrimental to people”- MLK
Right/wrong based on self-chosen values
Universal justice- Equal consideration for all
Heinz example
What Influences Moral Development?
IQ
Social Dev (empathy, thinking of others?)
Parenting style (emphasizes personal
responsibility)
Sibling behavior (models)
Religion
Culture
Personality (impulsiveness, open-mindedness)
Peers (need for approval)