Transcript ppt - Wayne Smith

Values in Contemporary Business:
A Primer on Ethical Decision-making for BUS 302
Wayne Smith, Ph.D.
Department of Management
CSU Northridge
[email protected]
“Legal” and “Ethical” are sometimes
similar
• If one is acting within the law, presumably one is acting
ethically.
• The law defines specific duties.
– Some conduct is prescribed.
– Some conduct is allowed.
– Some conduct is proscribed.
• If you are in Compliance – no further action
• There is formal punishment for illegal conduct.
• Statues and Regulations balance competing values.
2
“Legal” and “Ethical” are sometimes
different
• Ethics offers guidance on how one should act.
• Addresses situations where competing values clash.
• Action or inaction may be controlled by a formal or an
informal process.
• Ethics can be seen, therefore, as action beyond mere
compliance to legal duty.
• So…what, therefore, is ethical decision-making?
3
How to Resolve Ethical
Dilemmas in Business
• Identify the key ethical issue(s)
• Identify primary (direct) and secondary (indirect) stakeholders
– You need to incorporate their positions and perspectives
• Use an ethical decision-making approach (this provides structure for the
argument)
– You need a cohesive, understandable organization (choose one of the three—
Tucker or Velasquez (if not specifically provided by the instructor)
• Use multiple ethical decision-making theories/models/frameworks to
answer each part (this provides strength for the argument)
– You must base your argument in rigorous, relevant theory
• Compare alternatives and assess consequences
– You identify all major alternatives and estimate outcomes
Ethical Decision-making Approach —
Tucker
• Evaluate each alternative on:
–
–
–
–
–
Is the decision profitable (shareholders)?
Is the decision legal (society at large)?
Is it fair?
What is the impact on the rights of stakeholders?
What is the impact on sustainable development
(environment)?
Ethical Decision-making Approach —
Velasquez
• Moral Standards Approach
• Is the decision…
– Of net benefit to society?
– Fair to all stakeholders (fair distribution of benefits and
burdens)?
– Consistent with each person’s rights?
Ethical Decision-making Theories
• Philosophical Branches of Ethics
– These are ones that have had the widest impact over time
1. Utilitarianism (“evaluated by the consequences/value”)
2. Deontology (“inherent duty”)
3. Nicomachean (“moral virtues”)
• Applied Branches of Ethics
– These are combinations and derivatives of the first three
4. Rights Theory (“freedom, fairness, and equality”)
5. Justice Theory (“harm to a single individual”)
6. Corporate Social Responsibility (“organizational values”)
7
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
Utilitarianism
• Definition
– Utilitarianism is a branch of “Consequentialism”
– We evaluate the ethical decision by its results
– Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill
• Key Decision
– Benefits divided by Costs → “Best Ethical Decision”
• Key Question(s)
– What is the greatest good for the greatest number?
– What is the maximum aggregate utility for a population?
8
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
(Philosophy Bites audio files)
• Consequentialism (“evaluated by the results”)
– http://philosophybites.com/2007/09/brad-hooker-on-.html
– http://philosophybites.com/2011/09/philip-pettit-onconsequentialism-1.html
– Utilitarianism
• http://philosophybites.com/2007/07/roger-crisp-on-.html
9
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
Deontology
• Definition
– We evaluate the ethical decision by its relationship to a
person’s inherent duty
– Immanuel Kant, Georg Hegel
• Key Decision
• Endowments subject to Burdens → “Best Ethical Decision”
• Key Question(s)
• Categorical Imperative
– What is right, fair, and just for another individual (without
having to evaluate the consequences or use religion)?
• Reciprocity
– What is the best, empathic relationship for both individuals
or organizations?
• Enlightened Self-Interest
– What improves my inherent self-interest for society?
10
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
(Philosophy Bites audio files)
• Deontology
– Categorical Imperative (Immanuel Kant)
• http://philosophybites.com/2008/09/adrian-moore-on.html
– Moral Responsibility
• http://philosophybites.com/2010/11/gideon-rosen-onmoral-responsibility.html
11
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
Rights
• Definition
– We evaluate the ethical decision by its relationship to
certain inalienable rights
– John Locke, Jean-Jacques Rousseau
• Key Decision
– Legal Rights plus Natural Rights → “Best Ethical Decision”
• Key Question(s)
– Does this decision advance…
•
•
•
•
Fair and equal treatment?
Privacy and personal security?
Opportunity to keep one’s wealth and property?
Freedom to achieve self-actualization (e.g., life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness)?
– See also…The First 5 amendments to the U.S.
Constitution
12
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
(Philosophy Bites audio files)
• Rights
– http://philosophybites.com/2008/07/matthewkramer.html
– http://philosophybites.com/2013/10/johntasioulas-on-human-rights.html
13
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
Justice
• Definition
– We evaluate the ethical decision by its applicability to a
single individual
– Plato, Thomas Hobbes, John Rawls, Robert Nozick
• Key Decision
– Best for an Individual multiplied by Best for Society →
“Best Ethical Decision”
• Key Question(s)
– Can harm to a single individual be justified?
– Key Types of Justice
• Is the process fair and equal? (procedural justice)
• Is there a fair distribution of benefits and burdens? (distributive
justice)
• Is the punishment appropriate? (retributive justice)
14
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
(Philosophy Bites audio files)
• Justice
– Categorical Imperative (Immanuel Kant)
• http://philosophybites.com/2008/09/adrian-moore-on.html
– Moral Responsibility
• http://philosophybites.com/2010/11/gideon-rosen-onmoral-responsibility.html
– Justice
• http://traffic.libsyn.com/philosophybites/Michael_Sande
l_on_Justice.mp3
– Justice (John Rawls)
• http://philosophybites.com/2010/02/jonathan-wolff-onjohn-rawls-a-theory-of-justice.html
15
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
Nicomachean
• Definition (“moral virtues”)
– Courage, Temperance, Liberality, Generosity,
Magnamity, Immoderation, Gentleness, Friendliness,
Truthfulness, Sense of Shame, …
– Aristotle, Machiavelli (“vices”)
• Key Decision
– Good Virtues minus Bad Vices → “Best Ethical Decision”
• Key Question(s)
– What descriptive attributes will others ascribe to me?
– As an educated person, what will others expect of me?
– How will I be evaluated in the long run?
16
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
(Philosophy Bites audio files)
• Nicomachean
– Virtues
• http://philosophybites.com/2008/10/roger-crisp-on.html
– Ethics
• http://philosophybites.com/2009/04/terence-irwin-on-aristotlesethics.html
17
Ethical Decision-making Theory —
Corporate Social Responsibility
• Definition (“organizational values”)
– Organizational Values
– Keith Davis
• Key Decision
– Aligned with Organizational values → “Best Ethical
Decision”
• Key Question(s)
– Is this decision aligned (i.e., “consonant”) with our
espoused organizational vision, mission, or values?
– What would the public think if this decision were printed
on the front-page of the Wall Street Journal (or an
18
influential blog)?