Transcript Punishment

Operant Conditioning
Punishment – Chapter 9
Theories of Learning
October 24, 2005
Class #26
Punishment

Use of an aversive event contingent on
the occurrence of an inappropriate
behavior
– Used to suppress undesired behavior
– If effective, frequency or intensity (or both) of
behavior decreases
Types of Punishers

Positive punishment
– Use of a physically or psychologically painful
event as a punisher

Negative punishment
– Loss of reinforcement as a consequence of an
inappropriate behavior
– Also called omission training – reinforcement
is provided when an undesirable behavior is
withheld
Positive reinforcement adds a good thing
Negative reinforcement removes bad thing
Increases
Behavior
Reinforcement
+
Consequences

Punishment
Reduces
Punishment adds a bad thing
Response cost removes good thing
Types of Negative Punishment

Response cost
– An undesirable behavior results in withdrawal of
reward or failure to attain reward
 Example:
– Loss of privileges

Time-out
– A period of time during which reinforcement is
unavailable
 Example:
– Being sent to room after misbehaving
Does Punishment Work?
Skinner showed that punishment only
temporarily suppresses behavior
 More recent studies show that it can
permanently suppress behavior under
some conditions
 Under other conditions it has no effect or
only temporarily works

Severity of Punishment

Mild punishment doesn’t work
– Example: Drunk drivers do it again
With mild punishment, any suppression is
short-lived
 The more severe the punishment, the
longer it works

– Example: Sale of cigarettes to minors

Must be severe to accomplish permanent
behavior change
Consistency of Punishment

Punishment must be consistently
administered…
– Odds of a drunk driver being caught are 1 in
2000
– Suppression increases as the frequency of
punishment increases
– Delinquent boys more likely to have parents
who are inconsistent in their discipline
Delay of Punishment

Punishment must be immediate in order to
be effective
– Long delays often between arrest and trial for
drunk drivers
Drawbacks to Using
Punishment
Suppressive Effects
 Conditioning of Fear
 Emotional Response
 Aggression-Related Issues

– Pain-induced aggression
– Modeling of aggression

Reinforcing the Behavior of Punisher
Suppressive Effects
Yes, it may cause an increase in undesired
behavior
 But, it may also cause decrease in desired
behavior as well

– Example:
 Child gets punished for playing too aggressively
Conditioning of Fear

The aversive quality of punishment may
condition a fear response to the person
administering it
– The person delivering punishment becomes the SD
– Person will try to escape the punisher

Use of reinforcement together with punishment
prevents this association
– Children do not learn to fear a behavior therapist who
uses electric shock
Emotional Response

Positive punishment such as spanking or
yelling can elicit too strong an emotional
response from the child
– How can learning occur when child is
throwing a tantrum???
Aggression-Related Issues

Pain-induced aggression
– Pain elicits anger which may motivate
aggressive behavior
– An impulsive act energized by emotional
arousal, not avoidance

Modeling of aggression
– Children may imitate a parent’s aggressive
acts through observational learning
– Bandura’s Bobo doll study
Reinforcing the Behavior of
Punisher

Punisher is rewarded so maybe next time the
use of this method is premature
– Example:
 Spanked child stops bad actions so next
time…
Benefits of Punishment
Increase Social Behavior
 Improvement of Mood
 Increased Attention to the Environment

Increase Social Behavior

A natural tendency to return to “good
graces” of others
– Example:
 After time-outs often children will play
nicely with those they just whacked
Improvement of Mood

Distraction from what had caused the
tantrum is the idea here
– Example:
 Child is agitated – change in focus – less
agitation
Increased Attention to the
Environment

Motivation to what's going on around
them
– Example:
 A shout may work to get them to
appreciate what is happening around them
Effective Use of Punishment
Immediate vs. delayed
 Consistently applied
 Negative Punishment instead of Positive
Punishment when possible
 Sufficient (but not too much) intensity
 Explanation


Combined with positive reinforcement!
Conditioned Suppression
Theory

MILD PUNISHMENT to temporarily
suppress the misbehavior
– Conditioned Suppression Theory –
punishment doesn’t really weaken the
behavior, but it produces an emotional
response that interferes with the occurrence
of the behavior
PLUS
 REINFORCEMENT to emphasize and
strengthen the correct behavior
Avoidance Theory of
Punishment

Punishment leads to avoidance response
– Any other response than the one leading to
the punishment
Punishment Avoidance

The influence of punishment avoidance
“. . it is possible that punishment avoidance
does more to encourage crime than
punishment does to discourage it. Offenders
whose experience is limited largely to avoiding
punishment may come to believe that they are
immune from punishment, even in the face of
occasional evidence to the contrary” (Stafford &
War, 1993, p.125)
Premack Approach to
Punishment

Use a low-probability behavior to punish a
high-probability behavior…
– Example:
 Person hates exercising but loves to smoke
cigarettes
 Every time the person smokes more than three
cigarettes he or she must get on the treadmill for
an hour
Credits:


http://www.csupomona.edu/
http://a-s.clayton.edu/mccarty/PSYC3540/