Transcript An example from JPI Oceans

Joint Programming Initiatives:
the last chance or a rejuvenation case study?
Pier Francesco Moretti
Secretariat of JPI Oceans
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Di cosa parleremo oggi:
• Il processo verso le JPI
• La JPI Oceans
• Strategie future
alcune diapositive sono in inglese…
2
WHY a JPI?
JPI is a long process..a leg to build the ERA towards providing
knowledge-based solutions to Grand Challenges
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Responding to societal and policy needs
(EU 2020/Innovation Union…)
Grand Challenges and Innovation
3
United States
Japan
China
Malta
Latvia
Cyprus
Estonia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Bulgaria
Slovakia
Slovenia
ROmania
Hungary
Czech rep.
Greece
Poland
Ireland
Portugal
90000
Denmark
Austria
Finland
Belgium
Sweden
Netherlands
EU Community
Spain
Italy
UK
France
Public Funding for Research (Source : ERA Key Figures 2007, EC)
100000
EU27 + EC
80000
70000
60000
50000
40000
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Germany
Mio Euro
Most of the funds are national budgets…mainly in-kind
A compartmentalised ERA
30000
20000
10000
0
4
The first steps forward
coordinating national research programmes
Born in 1971, involves 36 countries.
scientifically driven, bottom-up, variable geometry platform
for coordinating national projects in pre-competitive research.
Born in 1985, involves 39 members.
An inter-governmental initiative to generate and support R&D
market-oriented projects, developing generic technologies of key
importance for European competitiveness, that is, the science-tomarket aspect.
industry driven, bottom-up, variable geometry platform
for coordinating national projects in competitive research.
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
COST does not fund research projects themselves.
A platform for the scientific community to cooperate on particular projects (named
COST actions). It is in some sense “glue money” (conferences, short-term mobility,
training and dissemination activities) to facilitate the cooperation between already
funded researchers
5
Coordinating national research programmes (1/2)
ERANETs = started in FP6, more than 100 consortia from 2002
with approx. more than 350 M€ contribution from EC.
EC reports the positive impact of ERANETs on ERA, national
programmes and their collaboration but a limited success in
creating multiannual joint programmes with critical mass
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
EC “reports” 1.4 G€ “coordinated” funds from Member States,
but the suspect is that they could be “labeled” funds. From
public info on NET-WATCH website only few consortia seem to
have funded multi-millionaire calls. Totally: approx. 200 calls
(requested as obligatory deliverables in the framework
conditions of the CSA!).
In summary:
• short term projects,
• enlarged eligibility,
• mainly limited to calls,
• difficulties in common/virtual pot with some Member States.
crucial for networking and mapping
6
Coordinating national research programmes (2/2)
Art. 185 TFEU (The TREATY on the FUNCTIONING of the
EUROPEAN UNION, ex art. 169 TEU): participation of EU in research and
development programmes undertaken by several Member States
FP6: EDCTP
Interim
(European
Evaluation
developing
AAL and
countries
Eurostars
clinical
(December
trials programme)
2010)
• Both initiatives as well as EMRP clearly demonstrate the functioning
of a partly virtual common pot.
• Operational arrangements constantly improving, very cost efficient
instrument from the Commission point of view.
FP7: 4 initiatives, 441 projects funded at the moment.
AAL-Ambient Assisted Living (ICT solutions for ageing). 20 MS + 3 AC.
Total volume €600 Million with 25% EU contribution
Eurostars-supporting R&D in SMEs: 27 MS + 6 AC.
Total volume €400 Million with 25% EU contribution
EMRP- European Metrology Research Programme. 19 MS + 3 AC.
Total volume €65 Million with 33% EU contribution.
BONUS-Baltic Sea Research. 8 MS + 1 AC.
Total volume €100 Million with 50% EU contribution.
Decision of the European Parliament +
Communication of the Commission +
Legal status suggested (flexible)
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
14 Member States and Norway, together with the Commission have taken the initiative
of
bringing
together substantial
national clinical
researcheffect
activities
programmes.
This
has
• Art.
185 creates
leverage
andand
European
added
value
been
possible by national
using for the
first time Article
169
of the EC
Treaty. Total volume €400
by integrating
programmes
and
pooling
resources.
Million with 50% EU contribution, 326 projects have been funded with €312 Million
7
An example from JPI Oceans: further steps forward
coordinating national research programmes
?
Art. 185
?
?
ERANET 5
FP5
FP6
FP7
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
?
Horizon 2020
8
What is the added value of a JPI?
JPI is a process:
with different typologies of actions (fresh money/calls, collaborative
projects, personnel mobility, technology transfer, etc.), different
instruments (including ERANET, Art. 185, CSA etc.)…:
6 Framework conditions for joint programming in research (as agreed by
the GPC at its meeting on 4 November 2010):
• Peer Review Procedures
• Foresight Activities
• Evaluation of Joint Programmes
• Funding of Cross-border Research by National or Regional Authorities
• Optimum Dissemination and Use of Research Findings
• Protection, Management and Sharing of Intellectual Property Rights
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
ADDED VALUES
• Long term perspective & capacity building
• High-level commitment
• Different typologies of actions
• Variable geometry (global approach vs local solutions)
• Stakeholders participation (multi-sectorial)
• Research to policy mechanism
• Common strategic agenda
9
How a JPI is born
Identifying Grand Challenges for support demands strict criteria, as
Challenging Europe’s Research: Rationales for the European Research Area
(ERA) / report of the ERA expert group 2008:
climate change, food, energy, security, ageing society
•
•
•
•
•
March 2008: European Council called on the Commission and Member States to explore
the potential of Joint Programming.
July 2009: Pilot JPI Neurodegenerative Diseases
April 2010: Launch first wave JPIs on Agriculture, Food security, Cultural Heritage, A
healthy diet for a healthy life:
May 2010: Second wave of 6 JPI’s, one of which: Healthy and Productive Seas and
Oceans.
November 2010: Council welcomed guidelines for Framework Conditions on Joint
Programming
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
resources will confine them to a small number. The core criteria are:
Relevance demonstrated by contribution to European-added value through
transnationality, subsidiarity and the need for a minimum critical effort;
A research dimension to ensure the buy-in of the research community and
the potential to induce improvements in efficiency and effectiveness;
Feasibility as an economic or social investment in terms of research and
industrial capability and a viable implementation path.
10
JPI today: comparison of their Terms of References
Name
Participants+observers
Neurodegenerative Diseases/Alzheimer's (JPND)
22
Food Security, Agriculture & Climate Change (FACCE)
19
Cultural Heritage & Global Change (CH)
17+8 Started in 2010
A Healthy Diet for a Healthy Life (DIET)
21
2nd WAVE: assessed as mature in spring 2011
Advisory Board/s
Management Board
(high level MS/AC representatives)
Strategic
Research & Innovation
Agenda
Secretariat
Executive committee
(MS/SC representatives)
14+9
6+9
13+3
15
13+7
16+2
Variable Geometry
Action Plan
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Urban Europe (URBAN)
Connecting Climate Knowledge for Europe (CLICK)
More Years, Better Lives (AGEING)
Antimicrobial Resistance (ANTIMICRO)
Water Challenges for a Changing World (WATER)
Healthy & Productive Seas and Oceans (OCEANS)
Strategic
Implementation
Agenda
Governing Structure vs Strategic Research Agenda:
Separate boards for scientific community and stakeholders:
DIET, CH, ANTIMICRO, URBAN, AGEING, WATER , FACCE (..a case study)
Unique advisory board (scientific community + stakeholders):
CLICK, OCEANS
11
JPI vs CSF: some worries, some confusion…
Can some calls, with some tenths of millions €, solve the Grand Challenges?
Absolutely not. They can help in a strategic agenda
of streamlined and in-tune actions.
The Framework Programme & Structural Funds should take care.
If I have an excellent team in my country but my government did not commit
a JPI…? If I develop top-science but I have no national funding capacity?
Any country should sit on the table.
The variable geometry permits to adopt actions of different typologies.
Will/should the Strategic research agendas provided by JPIs influence the
Work Programmes (calls) of the Framework Programme?
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
If “most of the Member States” agree on some “not so expensive” projects
to be funded? If “most of the Member States” agree on some “expensive”
projects/infrastructures to be funded?
EU instruments will contribute to fill large scale emerging
knowledge gaps and technological initiatives of importance to
solve the Grand Challenges (from the response to the
consultation to the Green Paper submitted by JPI Oceans and
EC COM “Partnering res & innovation”, to come).
12
JPI vs market: some worries, some confusion…
JPIs are between MS, most national research programmes are in public
research, as a consequence JPIs are mostly public research driven.
Innovation is creating (market) value satisfying user needs, i.e. demand
driven. However, JPI & Innovation can be connected (stakeholders
participation)
Stimulate technology transfer
• Involve private partners in JP, i.e. build public private partnerships
• Stimulate demonstration project and prototyping in JP
• Proof of concept in JP
• Besides excellence, focus more on impact in evaluation criteria
• Involve businesses in peer review
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Smarter use of public budgets can:
• help find solutions to the grand challenges facing Europe
• stimulate R&D&I activities in both science and business, and
• tap into the creativity and flexibility of innovative SMEs
Pre commercial procurement can be a method to integrate
innovation in JP, in those cases that:
• MS have a similar demand, i.e. a common societal challenge
• MS have procurement budget to partly solve this challenge
A common European approach will lead to:
• Lower costs
• Less fragmentation
13
JPI vs market: different roles…common strategy
JPI zone
+ Policy
planning
Fundamental
research
EIP zone
Basic technology Applied technology
research
research
+ Finance,
Procurem.,
Str.Funds...
Ideas, concepts
Pioneer
Basic & generic
Application
Devices &
systems
Annual budget
Per action
0,5 – 1 M€
1 – 5 M€
2 – 20 M€
50 – 100 M€
Time-to-Market
(typical)
Undefined
5-10 years
2-5 years
<2 years
Patents
From G. Clarotti - JP - Nether - 5-11
Adapted from B. Bigot - CEA
Deliver to market
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Public/Private
Funding ratio
Demonstration
& prototypes
14
International cooperation:
coordinating means avoiding fragmentation but….
The Heaven & the Hell
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
efficiency implies a selection of excellence:...choices!
15
JPI: how?
A durable Economy-Science-Governance interface
Drivers and Target Groups + stakeholders
Researchers
&
Technologists
Policy makers
&
Society
Create trust, sit at the table, read the menu...order.
...Before it is too late!
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Industry
&
Services
16
The correct approach at the table
JPI is a process.
…credible
salient
NOT slicing the cake,
BUT cooking!
…responsible
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Not a comparative advantage
but
a shared value
…sustainable
CONS: delays and costs of management.
17
JPI…
Cooperation
between member states, multi-sectorial and multi-disciplinary approach
Participation of all the stakeholders, informed choices, flexible actions,
“sustainable development”….if changed in “sustainability”
(from Edwin Zaccai at RESCUE Stakeholder Conference 16 May 2011, Brussels)…
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Common Challenges:
• Population
• Food security
• Resources
• Energy
• Producing more with less
• Urban
The Brundtland Commission, formally the World Commission on
Environment and Development (WCED), known by the name of its Chair Gro
Harlem Brundtland, was convened by the United Nations in 1983.
In 1987 the commission published the Bruntland Report…..
…yesterday
18
LA JPI OCEANS
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
JPI Healthy and Productive Seas and Oceans
19
News on the webpage…
An example from JPI Oceans:
mapping the national marine research funds
Institutional Funds
on marine research
(M€)
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Funds
per person
(€)
21
Governance Structure
Governance structure can be modified by the Management Board
Strategic
Research & Innovation
Agenda
Executive committee
(MS/SC representatives)
Secretariat
Variable Geometry
Action Plan
Strategic
Implementation
Agenda
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Strategic
Advisory
Board
Management Board
(high level MS/AC representatives)
22
History
May 2011: European Commission assessed JPI Oceans as mature
May 2011: JPI Oceans responded to green paper on the Common Strategic Framework for
EU Research and Innovation funding (CSFRI)
June 2011: JPI Oceans responded to European Commission consultation and proposed a Marine
Mining Pilot to be introduced in a future European Innovation Partnership on Raw Materials.
Other: Brochure, website, criteria for STAB
MANAGEMENT BOARD, for Italy:
M. Ali’/M. Uccellatore(MIUR), E.M. Pujia/G. Alati (MIT)
Strategic Advisory Board: 6 italian candidates (5 for research, 1 for industry)
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
INTERIM BOARD, for Italy: Giuseppe Cavarretta (CNR), Mario Dogliani (RINA)
June 2010: 1st Interim Management Board (IMB) meeting
October 2010: 2nd IMB meeting with Three working groups:
Mapping of national marine and maritime spending
Vision document
Terms of Reference
January 2011: 3rd IMB meeting
April 2011: 4th IMB meeting
April 2011: Handover of JPI Oceans dossier to the European Commission
23
WHO
Commitment from MS and AC Covering all European Seabasins
Observers
Secretariat
17 Members
Bonus
In Brussels
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
One vote per country. For Italy:
Mario Ali’/Maria Uccellatore (MIUR), Enrico Puja/Giuseppe Alati (MIT)
24
Vision and early gap analysis
Research, & Data
Infrastructure
EOOS
Examples:
• Healthy Seafood
•
Converging maritime
technologies, Blue
Biotech
Marine
Environment
Climate
Change
Maritime
Economy
and
Human activities
Unlock the potential of our maritim
economy and new promissing fields
renewables, bioeconomy while
preserving the environment and
the oceans as a source of wealth
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Marine environment is
under huge pressure
from human activities
and climate change, we
need a more comprehensive
knowledgebase
Understanding interactions
Oceans and climate to
Marine System understand, predict and
mitigate harmful impacts
like global warming
Examples:
• Climate change impact on
oceans
Human capacities,
Crosscutting
technologies
Examples:
• Climate change impact
on spatial Planning
•
Impact of climate
change on maritime
structures
Goals in the Vision Document (PUBLIC ACCESS)
Objectives in the Vision Document
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Foster enabling cross-cutting marine technologies across the maritime sectors
Foster the marine bio economy in relation to new products, services and jobs
Create the best enabling environment to maximise the development of marine renewable energies
Develop the necessary knowledge and technologies to conquer the new deep-sea frontier
Understand and mitigate impact of climate change and pressure from human activities on the marine
environment, to reach GES (Good Environmental Status) of our seas by 2020
Improve understanding of marine ecosystems and their processes, in particular delivery of ecosystem
services and the impacts of human activities
Understand climate change impact on coastal areas and the design of marine and maritime structures
and activities, to optimise mitigation and significantly reduce costly damages
Develop and sustain infrastructure to support an integrated data and information base enabling
industrial development and supporting maritime governance
Develop a research to policy mechanism, in particular to support of the marine strategy framework
directive and marine spatial planning and management
Foster the inter-disciplinary human capacities that are necessary to the JPI goals
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
• Enable the advent of a knowledge based maritime economy,
maximising its value in a sustainable way;
•Ensure Good Environmental Status of the seas and optimise planning
of activities in the marine space;
•Optimise the response to climate change and mitigate human impacts
on the marine environment.
26
EXAMPLES of how to get concrete actions:
OBJECTIVE
Improve understanding of marine ecosystems
and their processes, in particular delivery of
ecosystem services and the impacts of human
activities
MAPPING and ANALYSIS
Mapping reported needs and gaps
Existing models of marine ecosystems do not
Mapping who does what
represent or evaluate changes in biodiversity
Analyzing completeness and bias in review
Develop models of marine ecosystems
STRATEGIC AGENDA
including impacts of overfishing and climate
List of actions
change on biodiversity
Define priorities
IMPLEMENTATION AGENDA
Different typologies of tools
Feasibility (who, when) vs impact
MEASURABLE IMPACTS
1) Identification of best researchers :
collaborative project(MoU, funding for travel
exchange etc.)
2) Competition among teams: Joint funding
(call?, funding excluded ERC granter, H2020..)
3) No computing facility useful: increasing
computational power (sub-action)
4) Organizing meetings
5) Planning and/or funding Phd courses
More accurate predictions, targeted and
measurable policy advice for fisheries
EXAMPLES of how to get concrete actions:
Understand and mitigate the impact of climate change
OBJECTIVE
and pressure from human activities on the marine
environment, to reach GES of our seas by 2020
MAPPING and ANALYSIS
Mapping reported needs and gaps
Knowledge of the distribution of chemicals, water
Mapping who does what
circulation and air-water energy exchange in the
Analyzing completeness and bias in review Mediterranean is incomplete.
STRATEGIC AGENDA
List of actions
Define priorities
IMPLEMENTATION AGENDA
Different typologies of tools
Feasibility (who, when) vs impact
MEASURABLE IMPACTS
Increase in-situ observations in the southern
Mediterranean Sea
1) Enroll best researchers for identification of
sites, parameters, installations, etc.
2) Establish a table with high level representatives
from Med countries for analyzing legal/funding
solutions for accessing non-EU territories.
3) Variable geometry funding of observing
systems
4) Competitive call (H2020) for EU data inclusion
and open access
5) Variable geometry funding of knowledge
transfer and training in third countries.
More accurate predictions on water pollution,
targeted and measurable policy advice for risk
management
Prefiggersi un obiettivo,
come raggiungerlo?
Che ruolo ha la ricerca?
E’ solo una questione di soldi…?
Premessa
Cambiamenti globali, nuove sfide, crisi economica….Europa 2020….
Approccio
Sembra cambi molto nel ruolo della ricerca.
Grande attenzione al mondo produttivo (crescita, lavoro)
Non piu’ un aproccio tematico-disciplinare
Eccellenza come criterio di selezione
Cooperazione sempre alla base dei consorzi che prevedono enti di ricerca
Come
Strategie, coordinamento, interdisciplinareita’, pianificazione, sinergie…
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
Il nuovo Programma Quadro Europeo
di finanziamento per la Ricerca e l’Innovazione
HORIZON 2020
29
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
SOCIETAL
CHALLENGES
EXCELLENCE
SCIENCE
HEALTH well-being
BIOECO (bio-resources)
ENERGY
TRANSPORT
CLIMATE & non-bio resources
INCLUSIVE SOCIETY
SECURE SOCIETY
ERC
FET
Marie Curie
INFRA
INDUSTRIAL
LEADERSHIP
KET (ICT, nano, biotech, materials, manufactiring,space)
Access to finance
SME
30
Sinergie e strategie
Horizon 2020 (art. 183)
EU actions
Joint Programming
Structural Funds
Initiatives
for R&D and innovation
Possible no EU actions
10 JPI=
≈ 10G€/year?
SOCIETAL
CHALLENGES
28-20-36
Cross-cutting issues
>10G€/year?
Quinn & Hahn
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
FP7= ≈10G€/year
(fresh money)
≈10 G$...
Art. 185
(COM:
Partnering in res
& innovation)
31
Riflessioni:
Anche le Regioni possono avere quindi un ruolo maggiore rispetto al passato nelle
strategie europee (Smart specialization e cofinanziamento).
Le lobby personali/di gruppo assumono piu’ forza se in lnea con le priorita’ e
impegni nazionali.
Il finanziamento deve essere accompagnato da altre azioni (ERA ecc..)
Pier Francesco Moretti - CNR - Italy
I Paesi Membri avranno un ruolo dominante in caso di allineamento dei programmi
nazionali e co-finanziamento (vedi Art 12a e 18a di Horizon 2020)
e sicuramente l’adattamento alle regole/programmi e’ perdente rispetto alla loro
definizione…
32