Transcript Slide 1

From Policy to Strategy
Graham Quarrier
Project Manager, Environment Agency
Aims of the strategy
DO NOT SCALE
Develop policies into
workable solutions
FC4
FC5
FC3
Decide protection
required for each area
Alignments and
type of defence
100 year investment
plan
FC6
FC2
FC7
FC1
FC8
FC9
FC10
FC11
A3
ORIGINAL SCAL E
ORIGINAL SCAL E
SEVERN ESTUARY
FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT
STRATEGY
ORIGINAL SCAL E
1:250,000
DEFINITION OF
STRATEGIC FLOOD CELLS
REVISION
DRAWN
0
DRAWING NUM BER
5061267 / WA-RC / 003
CHECKED
PJC
DATE
AUTHORISED
PJC
DATE
02/08
RGS
DATE
02/08
02/08
Asset Management
• Consider asset life and
cycles of investment
• Multiple interventions
possible
• Time our works to optimise
value of investment
• Gradual adaptation to
climate change
Developing Strategic Options
Policy
Assets
Protected
Low
Approach
Typical Effect
Maintain
existing
Slow reduction
in protection
Medium
Keep pace
with climate
change
Some new
investment in
banks
High
Improve
standard of
protection
New banks,
walls,
revetments
HOLD
THE LINE
Targeting Funding
Standard of protection is not guaranteed
Standard of protection will vary overtime
Defra and WAG require good return on funding
Highest benefit/cost ratio and highest number
of properties will be first in the queue
Calculations are all based on existing
development
Adapting to flooding
Landowners have right to
protect their own land
Advice / Grants available for
making property resilient
Flood warden schemes
Or
Habitat creation through land
purchase or environmental
stewardship
EA strategy and development
EA Funded FRM works
Works under PPS25
Targets existing development
For new development
Homes are top priority
Multiple priorities
No pre-determined standard of
protection
Prescribed standards including
climate change
Multiple interventions over time Usually one-off opportunity for
contributions from developers
Long term obligations on
habitats
One-off requirement for
compensatory habitat
Integrating the strategy with development
EA strategy is what it
can do alone (baseline)
Integration with LDFs
(evidence base)
Contributions can
change the priority of
works
Possible “Roof tax”
arrangements