Transcript Introducing

FaStack Technology
A Look at Various 3D Applications,
Their Designs, and Ultimate Silicon
Results
Tezzaron Semiconductor
3D Stacking Approaches
Chip Level
Amkor : 4S CSP (MCP)
Transistor Level
Matrix: Vertical TFT
Wafer Level
Competitors : Conceptual
• Infineon/IBM
• RPI
• Ziptronix
• ZyCube
• TruSi
• Xan3D/Vertical Circuit/Tessera
Tezzaron: Actual
Irvine Sensors : Stacked Flash
Tezzaron: 3 wafer stack
Density gain : “Yes”
Cost impact: “Expensive”
Speed gain: “Zero or Negative”
Reliability: “No”
Multi-Func: “Limited”
: “Limited” only for PROM
: “Expensive” due to low yield
: “Extremely slow”
: “No”
: “No”
Tezzaron Semiconductor
: “Yes”
: “Cost effective”
: “Extremely fast”
: “yes”
: “yes”
Wafer Level Stacking Approaches
Infineon/IBM
Infineon : W deep via
RPI/ Ziptronix/ ZyCube
RPI : Dielectric bonding
Ziptronix : Covalent bond (4-inch)
Tezzaron
Tezzaron : Copper bonding
Backside of the stacked wafer
IBM : SOI wafer
thinning
ZyCube : Injection glue bonding
3 wafer stack
Impediments:
• Sliced wafer handling
• Alignment budget
• Uniform bonding
• Film stress during deep via fills
• Wafer warp
• Heat dissipation
Impediments:
• Large alignment errors
• Strength/uniform bonding, voids
• Peeling propensity during thinning
• Film stress during deep via fills
• Wafer warp
• Heat dissipation
Tezzaron Semiconductor
3D Sensor
“All key elements; Alignment, Bonding
(Uniformity & Strength), Low thermal
budget ( <400C), Si thinning (Control &
Uniformity), Limiting stacking yield
losses, Facile heat dissipation of wafer
level stacking have been simultaneously
integrated to meet market demand for
density, cost and speed”
The Objective
Tezzaron Semiconductor
“It is clearly seen in Figure 1, that without further reductions in interconnect delay, reducing gate
dimensions much below 130nm do not result in corresponding chip improvements.”
NSA Tech Trends Q3 2003
Tezzaron Semiconductor
Denser!
Tezzaron Semiconductor
Faster!
Shorter Wires
td  0.35 x rcl2
Propagation delay is proportional to:
Tezzaron Semiconductor
1
# of layers
• Global Interconnect “problem”
• Span of Control
Tezzaron Semiconductor
Lower Power!
Poweravg = Capacitancetot x Voltage2 x Frequency
Therefore:
Poweravg  Capacitancetot
Capacitance is mostly due to wires.
Stacked wire length 
1
# of layers
Therefore:
Poweravg stacked 
Poweravg single layer
# of layers
Tezzaron Semiconductor
Lower Costs!
•
•
•
•
•
Less processing per layer
Better optimization per wafer
Higher bit density (memories)
Lower test cost (using Bi-STAR™)
Higher yield (using Bi-STAR™)
Tezzaron Semiconductor