See if this will print

Download Report

Transcript See if this will print

Economics and Business
Exchange
Supported by Deloitte.
Trends in the structure and
impact of the UK tax system
Howard Reed
Economics & Business Exchange
13 June 2006
Outline
•
•
•
•
The overall tax burden
Distributional impacts
Structural trends
Future trends?
The extent of taxation
total tax as share of GDP
55
50
UK
OECD average
EU-15
US
Japan
Canada
Sweden
45
40
35
30
25
20
2002
2000
1998
1996
1994
1992
1990
1988
1986
1984
year
Source: OECD
Does the tax “burden”
matter?
• Macro evidence shows little obvious
correlation between tax (or spending)
levels and GDP growth)
• Microeconomic theory suggests taxes can
create distortions and reduce efficiency
• …but can also correct market failures
• Depends how the money’s spent
• Equity and efficiency objectives
Tax share vs GDP growth,
1995-2005, OECD countries
Tax take and economic growth, OECD countries, 1995-2004
Real economic growth (average
% per annum)
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
total tax receipts as % of GDP
Source: OECD
60
Distributional effects of tax
system
Key definitions:
• A proportional tax takes the same proportion of
income from all households (or :families,
individuals)
• A progressive tax takes a larger proportion from
richer households than poorer
• A regressive tax takes a smaller proportion from
richer households than poorer
Distributional effects of tax
system
• Best recent work: John Hills, Inequality and the
State (2004)
• Distributional impact of tax system on weekly
incomes:
–
–
–
–
–
–
Income tax: progressive
NICs: (mostly) progressive
VAT: regressive
Excise Duties: regressive
Local taxation: regressive
OVERALL: regressive for bottom 10% of
distribution, proportional elsewhere
Issues with distributional
analysis
• ‘snapshot’ vs. life cycle
• Incidence (who really pays a tax?)
• When transfers (benefits/ tax credits) are
included, overall redistribution
UK trends: 1970s-1990s
Personal taxes (income tax & NICs)
• Cuts in basic rate IT seen as popular since
1970s
• Parallel rises in NICs (and other taxes…)
• A false dichotomy?
Indirect taxes
• Big rises in VAT 1979 and 1992
• Fuel duty escalator – 1990s
Corporate tax
• Large reductions 1984-1999
UK trends since 1997
Personal taxes (income tax & NICs)
• Continuation of the philosophy that rises in NICs are
preferable to raising IT
• Some redistribution (via NICs) but mainly via tax credit
system
Indirect taxes
• Some new environmental taxes (e.g. Climate Change
levy)
• But fuel duty escalator ended, no major shift towards
‘green taxation’
Corporate tax
• Stable since 1999
• Various micro measures – ‘fine tuning’ or ‘tinkering’?
Recent UK trends: revenue
shares
100%
90%
80%
70%
60%
50%
40%
30%
20%
10%
0%
excise
VAT
property/local
payroll
employer NICs
employee NICs
corporate income
Personal income
1975
1985
1995
2003
Source: OECD
Recent international trends
Personal taxes:
• Decreasing number of marginal rates &
bands
• Decreasing top rates
Corporate taxes:
• Trend towards reductions in rates
Future developments?
•
•
•
•
•
Overall tax (and spending) pressures
Drive for ‘simplicity’
Flat tax?
Corporate tax ‘race to the bottom’?
The political dimension
Overall tax pressures
20
10
/1
1
20
09
/1
0
20
08
/0
9
20
07
/0
8
20
06
/0
7
20
05
/0
6
42
41
40
39
38
37
20
04
/0
5
% of GDP
HM Treasury estimates for tax as share
of GDP: 2006-2011
financial year
Source: HM Treasury,Budget 2006
Tax simplicity
• Much criticism of increased complexity in tax
system
• Often relates to inherently complex areas
(financial taxation, international corporate tax,
etc)
• But not always (e.g. corp tax micro-measures)
• Also tax credit administrative problems
• Obvious simplifications get ignored
– Merge income tax and NICs?
Flat tax
• Flavour of the month last summer
• A ‘flat tax’ does not necessarily mean a flat
(or simple) tax system
• Can separate marginal rate structure from
simplification arguments
• A ‘Trojan horse’ for tax cuts?
• Seems to improve compliance more than
work effort (World Bank/IFS research on
Russia)
The political debate
Conservatives: ‘flatter, simpler, fairer’
• tax commission reports later this year
Lib Dems: ‘Fairer, simpler, greener’
• cut basic rate income tax
• No more 50p rate
• shift to ‘green’ taxes
Labour: key pledges on income tax
Key future issues to be resolved:
• Spending path from CSR07
• Longer term commitments (e.g. 10-year childcare
strategy)
• Tax competition (particularly corporate tax)
Economics and Business
Exchange
Supported by Deloitte.