Transcript Lecture 6.

Surviving Professional Life Ethically :
A Perspective from the Idea of
Respect for Persons
Prof. Donna Knapp van Bogaert, PhD, D. Phil
Steve Biko Centre for Bioethics
February 21, 2007 10h00-11h00
GEMP
Outline
2
Outcomes
3
Respect for Persons


What does it mean to respect persons ?
From where did the idea come that we
should respect persons?



Ethical theory grounding respect for persons.
Case study & Example
Arguments against; Difficulties facedrsons
4
Case Study (1)


You and four of your fellow medical
students are on duty in a busy out-patient
department (OPD).
You are all sitting writing up patient notes
when your superior, a registrar, calls all of
you over to the cubicle in which he is
working.
5
On the examination table is a man
who appears to be around 70 years
old.
 His clothes are near the bed and you
notice that they look like those
typically worn by members of a
conservative religious community.
 You also observe that this elderly
man is clearly embarrassed.

6



The registrar is in the process of
performing a digital rectal examination on
him.
“Hey guys, you’ve got to feel this”, the
registrar exclaims, “you shouldn’t miss the
rare opportunity of palpitating a tumor this
size!”
And the five of you, in turn, proceeded to
insert your fingers into the rectum of this
man and perform a digital rectal
examination.
7
Case Study (2)

In 2003, a BMJ article exposed that nearly ¼
of rectal and vaginal examinations were
performed on anaesthetised patients by
medical students without the patient’s
knowledge or consent (Sokol 2004).
8
Commonalities




Both
Both
Both
Both
involve medical students
involve patients
involve medical hierarchy
have significant ethical dimensions
9
Respect for Persons:
Grounding All Relationships


Origins
Applications to healthcare practice
10
Immanuel Kant





1700’s
Philosopher
Logistician
Teacher
(Bachelor, extremely
Punctual & invented
garter contraption to
keep his stockings up as
they were always falling
down).
11
Kant’s Second Formulation of the
Categorical Imperative




Persons as ends-in-themselves
To respect people is to treat them as ends in themselves. He
sees people as autonomous (Gr. Self-rule; self-governance) .
 The opposite of respecting people is treating them as mere
means to an end.
Always treat persons (rational agents) as ends-in-themselves
and never merely as means to your own ends.
Case Study
12
Who or what should be respected


For Kant, the proper object of respect is the will.
So if we respect persons, our respect necessarily
includes knowledge, freedom, choice – the
things that are involved in having a will (wille).
Other possible objects of respect are




Feelings and emotions
People or things who are not living
Non-human Animals
All living entities included in the “natural world”
13
Immanuel Kant


One of Kant’s most enduring contributions
to moral philosophy was his emphasis on
the notion of respect.
From the notion that each human is of
intrinsic value and as such deserves to be
treated with respect, such notions as e.g.
informed consent, confidentiality, &
humane treatment are further supported.
14
Discussion

Looking at the case study from a Kantian
perspective : Respect for Persons



Who are the role players?
What are their relationships?
Power – How does it fit into the picture?



What should students do if they observe unethical
professional behavior?
What should ethical students do if they observe
unethical behavior on the part of other students?
What recommendations would you give to other
students concerning ethically surviving student life?
15
STEP 1
WHAT IS THE PROBLEM?
Formulate the ethical
problem or dilemma
Decision tree for
complex ethical reasoning
STEP II
KEEP AN OPEN MIND
1. AVOID
solutions
requiring
NO THOUGHT
on your part
2. TALK
to
others
3. Be
responsive to
appropriate
FEELINGS or
EMOTIONS
4. Be open to
ALTERNATIVE
UNDERSTANDINGS
and VIEWS
STEP III
Ascertain information
& facts relevant to the
case.
STEP IV
Consider what
the LAW says
Identify and weigh the
ethical
VALUES and STANDARDS
applicable to the case
STEP V
Considering their relative
weight, APPLY the ethical
values and standards to
the facts, and make a
DECISION
5. Be open
to the
best
impartial
REASONS
Professional
declarations, oaths
and codes
HPCSA or other
national
guidelines, rules
Religion, belief
systems
Precedents
Society’s traditions
Environmental issues
ACTION
(act or omission)
16
Selected References



Singer, M. 1961, Generalization in Ethics. NY: Alfred
Knopf.
Sokol, D.K. 2004. How to be a “good” medical student.
Journal of Medical Ethics, 30612.
van Bogaert, DK. 2005 Ethics & Moral Philosophy: A
Reader. Pretoria: Dept of Family Medicine U Limpopo.
17
Thank you
18