Transcript 8-31

What
is ethics?
What is autonomy?
Models of the healthprofessional-patient
relationship
What ought to be done
in a given situation,
all things considered?
--Benjamin and Curtis
What ought to be done...
Action oriented
 Implies personal ownership and
responsibility
 Implies choice
 Implies reasonable control

…in a given situation...
All ethics is “situation ethics”
 Concrete facts matter
 What makes one situation like another
situation in ethically relevant ways?

…all things considered?
There is no “ethical point of view” distinct
from other (“practical”) points of view
 Good ethical reasoning is not a new
viewpoint but an integration (and critical
analysis) of all existing viewpoints
 Can we ever in practice “consider all
things” finally and irrevocably?
(Provisional nature of ethical conclusion)

What ought to be done in a
given situation, all things
considered?
Is this the only “ethical”
question?
Snapshot
ethics
vs.
Videotape ethics
Snapshot vs. videotape
What
does it mean to do the
right thing now?
What does it mean to live a
morally good life?
Snapshot vs. videotape
 What
does it mean to do the right thing
now?
Rules,
 What
principles, case study
does it mean to live a morally
good life?
Virtue
(Respect for) Autonomy
 Not
interfering in another’s wishes and
choices
 Treat others as ends-in-themselves and
not as means only (Kant)
 = Self-determination
 Assumes “adult” capacities
Paternalism
 Refusing
to acquiesce in
another person’s wishes or
choices for that person’s own
benefit.
--Childress
Paternalism and Principles
Paternalism = principle of benefit/harm
takes priority over principle of autonomy
 Other, non-benefit-based reasons to
reject autonomy not paternalism
 Is it “really” paternalism if principle of
autonomy does not apply due to lack of
capacity?

Why paternalism and not
parentalism?
 Is
concept gender-specific?
 Does it derive from a gender-specific
role?
 “Father Knows Best” (TV show,
1950’s)
Paternalism and the history of
U.S. medical ethics
Hippocratic ethic: no challenge to physician
paternalism
 1960’s: traditional authority questioned
 Veatch: Contractual vs. priestly model of
physician-patient relationship, 1972
 Veatch, “generalization of expertise,” 1973

Paternalism and the history of
U.S. medical ethics
Much
of U.S. medical
ethics since the 1960’s
amounts to the refutation
of physician paternalism
Autonomy: Problems to flag
Is autonomy culturally specific?
 Is autonomy gender biased?
 Does autonomy favor some life stages over
others?
 Does autonomy focus on individual in
isolation rather than as member of family
and community?

Models of P-patient
relationship
Veatch, 1972: Priestly vs. Contractual
models
 Miller, 1981: 4 senses of autonomy
 Emanuels, 1992: Paternalistic vs.
Informative models-- and more

Miller, 4 senses of autonomy
 Free
action
 Authenticity
 Effective deliberation
 Moral reflection
--Miller, Hastings Cen Rep 1981
Autonomy and Relationship
Miller: Sense of
Emanuels: Model of
Autonomy
Relationship
Effective Deliberation
Informative
Authenticity
Interpretive
Moral reflection
Deliberative
Emanuels’ Models
Informative
Competent technical expert
Interpretive
Counselor or adviser
Deliberative Teacher or friend
If you went to your physician for
medical care, what role would you
want him or her to play, and why?
Would it matter what the medical
problem was?