2. Near field coupling

Download Report

Transcript 2. Near field coupling

Electromagnetic interference
Done by
‫عماد خليل العجلة‬
‫عالء خليل العجلة‬
Instructor
‫محمد عودة‬.‫د‬
1
Outline
 Source and victim
 Emissions
 Immunity
 Causes of internal radar interference
 External radar interference
 EMC design
2
Interference coupling mechanisms
3
Interference coupling mechanisms
source
victim
coupling path
Direct
coupling
4
Near field
coupling
Radiated
coupling
coupling path
1. Direct coupling
Coupling via power
or signal lines
5
Common impedance
coupling
1. Direct coupling
Coupling via power
or signal lines
6
1. Direct coupling
Common impedance
coupling
7
coupling path
2. Near field coupling
Magnetic or
inductive coupling
8
Electric or
capacitive coupling
2. Near field coupling
Magnetic or
inductive coupling
9
2. Near field coupling
Electric or
capacitive coupling
10
2. Near field coupling
 Spacing
11
coupling path
3. Radiated coupling
Field generation
12
Wave impedance
coupling path
4. Coupling modes
Differential
mode
13
Common mode
Antenna mode
Coupling modes
Differential
mode
14
Coupling modes
Common mode
15
Coupling modes
Antenna mode
16
Interference coupling mechanisms
Emissions
Radiated
emission
17
Conducted
emission
Emissions
Radiated
emission
 Radiation from the PCB
18
Emissions
Radiated
emission
 Radiation from cables
19
Interference coupling mechanisms
Immunity
20
Causes of internal radar interference
Standards used : MIL-HDBK-237
21
What is jamming [2]
 jamming is a form of Electronic Warfare where jammers radiate
interfering signals toward an enemy's radar, blocking the receiver with
highly concentrated energy signals
22
 jammers can be categorized into two general types:
1- barrage jammers
2- deceptive jammers (repeaters).
 Barrage jammers attempt to increase the noise level across the
entire radar operating bandwidth.
 Barrage jammers are often called maskers
 Barrage jammers can be deployed in the main beam or in the side
lobes of the radar antenna
23
 Repeater jammers carry receiving devices on board in order to
analyze the radar’s transmission, and then send back false targetlike signals in order to confuse the radar
 There are two common types of repeater jammers:
1- spot noise repeaters
2- deceptive repeaters
24
Spot and Barrage Jamming
25
Self-Screening Jammers (SSJ) [2]
26
27
Self-Screening Jammers (SSJ)
 The single pulse power received by the radar from a target of RCS , at range
, is
 The power received by the radar from an SSJ jammer at the same range is
 BJ > Br jammer bandwidth is usually larger than the operating bandwidth of
the radar.
28
 S/J ratio for a SSJ
 The jamming power is generally greater than the target
signal power.
 The ratio s/j is less than unity.
29
 As the target becomes closer to the radar, there will be a certain range
such that the ratio s/j is equal to unity.
 This range is known as the cross-over range.
 The range window where the ratio S ⁄j is sufficiently larger than unity
is denoted as the detection range.
 In order to compute the crossover range
30
For a radar with a detection range of 100 km for an RCS of 5m2, [3]
31
This program calculates the cross-over range and generates plots of
relative S and J versus range normalized to the cross-over range
32
Wave length
in dB
Conversion to db
33
34
By matlab
35
Stand-Off Jammers (SOJ)
36
Stand-Off Jammers (SOJ)
 ECM signals from long ranges.
 The power received by the radar from an SOJ jammer at range RJ
is
 The gain term G’ represents the radar antenna gain in the
direction of the jammer
37
38
The inputs to the program ‘soj_req.m’ are the same as in the SSJ case , with
jammer peak power Pj = 5000w , jammer antenna gain Gj =30 dB, radar antenna
gain on the jammer G’ =10dB, and radar to jammer range R= 22.2 Km
39
EMC design
 There are many design considerations that need to be taken
 Cable wiring
 Connectors
 Grounding
 Shielding
 The reference for good consideration is standard
40
What is FEKO program?
41
Cable coupling analyses
42
Cable coupling analyses
 The result
43
EMC analysis of a wire inside a
metallic box
44
Cont.
45
Reference
 [1] H.-D. Brüns, H. Singer, “Computation of Interference in Cables Close to







46
Metal Surfaces,” IEEE Int. Symposium on EMC, Denver, 1998, pp 981-986
[2] CRC Press - MATLAB Simulations for Radar Systems Design
[3] Air and Space borne Radar Systems - An Introduction
[4] Intro duction to airborne radar second edition George W. stimson
[5] Tim Williams, EMC for Product Designers, Fourth edition
[6] CLAYTON R. PAUL, Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility,
Second Edition
[7] Frank H. Sanders Effects of RF Interference on Radar Receivers
[8] EMI from Cavity Modes of Shielding Enclosures – FDTD Modelling and
Measurements,” M. Li, J. Nuebel et al, IEEE Trans on EMC,Vol. 42, No. 1, February
2000, pp. 29-38.