(a) Band diagram of an ideal MOS diode.

Download Report

Transcript (a) Band diagram of an ideal MOS diode.

CHAPTER 6: MOSFET & RELATED
DEVICES
Part 1
MOSFET and Related Devices
6.1 The MOS diode
6.2 MOSFET fundamentals
6.3 MOSFET scaling
6.4 CMOS and BiCMOS
6.5 MOSFET on insulator
6.6 MOS memory structures
6.7 The power MOSFET
THE MOS DIODES
Figure 6.1. (a) Perspective view of a metal-oxide-semiconductor (MOS) diode. (b)
Cross-section of an MOS diode.
THE MOS DIODES (cont.)
Figure 6.2. Energy band diagram of an ideal MOS diode at V = 0.
• KEYWORDS :
a) Work Function,
: Energy difference between
the Fermi level and the vacuum level.
b) Electron affinity,
: Energy difference between
the conduction band edge and the vacuum level in
the semiconductor.
c)
: Energy difference between the Fermi level
EF and the intrinsic Fermi level Ei
THE MOS DIODES (cont.)
An ideal MOS is defined as follows:
a) At zero applied bias, the energy difference between the metal work
function (qm) and the semiconductor work function (qs) is zero or the
work function difference (qms) is zero
qm  qm  qs 
Eg


 qm  q 
 q B   0
2


# The energy band is flat
(flat band condition) when (1)
there is no applied voltage
b) The only charges that exist in the diode under any biasing conditions are
those in the semiconductor and those with equal but opposite sign on the
metal surface adjacent to the oxide.
c) There is no carrier transport through the oxide under direct current
(dc) - biasing condition or the resistivity of the oxide is infinite.
THE MOS DIODES
CASES (cont.)
a) ACCUMULATION CASE :
- V<0 is applied to the metal plate,
holes will be induced at the SiO2 – Si
interface.
- Bands near the semiconductor surface
are bent upward. It cause an increase
in the energy Ei-EF which in turn gives
rise to an enhanced concentration and
accumulation of holes near the oxidesemiconductor interface
- No current flows.
b) DEPLETION CASE :
- V>0 is applied, the energy bands near
the semiconductor surface are bent
downward.
- Holes (majority carriers) are depleted.
ENERGY BAND DIAGRAMS AND
CHARGE DISTRIBUTIONS OF
AN IDEAL MOS DIODE
THE MOS DIODES (cont.)
c) INVERSION CASE :
 Larger positive voltage
applied, energy bands bend
downward even more so the Ei
at the surface crosses over
the Fermi level.
 The positive gate voltage
starts to induce excess
electrons at the SiO2 – Si
interface.
 Electrons greater than holes,
thus the surface is inverted.
Carrier density (holes) depends on energy difference
n p  ni e( EF  Ei ) / kT
THE MOS DIODES (cont.)
The surface depletion region
Figure 6.4. Energy band diagrams at the surface of a p-type semiconductor.
 (electrostatic potential)=0 (in bulk)
s (surface potential)=  (at s/c surface)
Electron concentration
Hole concentration
n p  ni e
(2)
p p  ni e( Ei EF ) / kT
Expressed as a
function of 
(3)
See eq. (4) & (5)
n p  ni e
q (   B ) / kT
p p  ni e
ns  ni e
( EF  Ei ) / kT
q ( B   ) / kT
q ( s  B ) / kT
ps  ni e
q ( B  s ) / kT
(4)
 is positive when the
(5)
band is bent downward
(6)
Densities at the surface
(7)
The following regions of surface potential can be distinguished:
s0
Accumulation of holes (bands bend upward)
s=0
Flat-band condition
Bs0
Depletion of holes (bands bend downward)
s=B
Midgap with ns=np=ni (intrinsic concen.)
s>B
Inversion (bands bend downward)
d 2    s ( x)

2
dx
s
 as a function of distance
(1D poisons eq.)
s(x)
: charge density per unit volume
s
: dielectric permittivity
(7)
When the semiconductor is depleted to a width of W and the charge
within the semiconductor is given by  s  qN A ,
Electrostatic potential at
surface depletion region:
qN AW 2
s 
2 s
(8)
Note: Potential distribution = one sided n+ -p junction
The surface is inverted whenever sB
ns (e concen. at surface)= nA (substrate impurity concentration)
s (inv)  2B 
Maximum width of the surface
depletion region Wm:
Qsc  qN AWm   2q s N A (2 B )
2kT  N A 

ln 
q  ni 
Wm 
2 s s (inv )

qN A
N 
 s kT ln  A 
 ni 
Wm  2
q2 N A
(9)
2 s (2 B )
qN A
(10)
Example
For an ideal metal-SiO2-Si diode having
NA=1017cm-3, calculate the maximum
width of the surface depletion region
Solution:
At room temp. kT/q=0.026 and
ni=9.65x109cm-3, the dielectric permittivity
of Si is 11.9x8.85x10-14F/cm
Wm  2

17
11.9  8.85 10 14  0.026 ln 10
1.6 10 19 1017
 10 5 cm  0.1m
Figure 6.5. Maximum depletion-layer width versus impurity concentration
of Si and GaAs under strong-inversion condition.
9.65 109

Ideal MOS Curves
No work function differences –
applied voltage appear partly
across oxide & across
semiconductor
V  Vo  S
Vo   o d 
QS d
 ox

QS
Co
Vo
Potential across the oxide
o
Field in the oxide
QS
Charge per unit area
Co
Oxide capacitance per
unit area
(a) Band diagram of an ideal MOS diode. (b)
Charge distributions under inversion condition.
(c) Electric field distribution. (d) Potential
distribution
C Total capacitance of MOS diode
Co Oxide capacitance
Cj Semiconductor depletion-layer
capacitance
C
Co C j
(Co  C j )
Co 
W Width of depletion
o Permittivity in vacuum
ox Insulator permittivity
Cj 
F / cm 2
 ox
d
s
W
(a) High-frequency MOS
C-V curve showing its
approximated segments
(dashed lines). Inset
shows the series
connection of the
capacitors. (b) Effect of
frequency on the C-V
curve.2
Threshold voltage:
2 s qN A (2 B )
qN AWm
VT 
  s (inv) 
 2 B
Co
Co
Minimum value of total capacitance:
Cmin 
 ox

d   0 x Wm
 s 
The SiO2 – Si MOS diode
 Metal-SiO2-Si : most extensively studied
 Work function difference qms  0 (for metal
electrodes)
 Work function semiconductor qs (Energy
difference: Between vacuum level – Fermi
level)
 Work function metal qm  difference: qms
(qms - qs)
Aluminum : qm = 4.1eV
Polysilicon : n+ qm = 4.05eV
p+ qm = 5.05eV
Work function difference as a function of
background impurity concentration for Al, n+-,
and p+ polysilicon gate materials.
 To construct energy band diagram
(in the figure)
 In the isolated metal &
semiconductor – all bands are flat
 At thermal equilibrium: constant
Fermi level & continuous vacuum
level.
 At thermal equilibrium:
metal +ve charge
semiconductor surface  –ve
charge
 To get ideal flat band: apply a
voltage = qms
 So apply –ve voltage VFB to metal
 flat band voltage (VFB = ms)
(a) Energy band diagram of an isolated metal and an isolated
semiconductor with an oxide layer between them. (b) Energy band
diagram of an MOS diode in thermal equilibrium.
Interface Traps & Oxide Charges
 MOS diode is affected by charges in the
oxide & traps in the SiO2-Si interface
 Classifications of traps & charges:
 Interface-trapped charge
 Fixed oxide charge
 Oxide trapped charge
Mobile ionic charge
 Interface trapped charge Qit
 due to SiO2-Si interface properties &
chemical composition in the interface
 Location: SiO2-Si
 Interface trap density (number of
interface traps per unit area & per eV)
 in 100 the interface trap density is
an order of magnitude smaller than
111
Fixed charge, Qf
 Location: within 3nm of the SiO2-Si interface
 The charge is fixed – cannot be charged or discharged
 Qf is generally +ve & can be regarded as a charge sheet located
at the SiO2-Si interface
Oxide-trapped charges, Qot
 Associated with defects in SiO2
 The charges can be created (Eg. by X-ray radiation or high energy
electron bombardment) – traps are distributed inside the oxide layer.
 Can be removed by low temperature annealing
 Mobile ionic charges, Qm
 Eg. Sodium & alkali ions – mobile under raised-temperature (Eg. >100oC)
& high field operations.
 Stability problem in semiconductor devices operated under high bias &
high temperature conditions
Mobile ion charges move back & forth through the oxide layer  cause
shifts of CV curves along voltage axis
Mobile ions have to be eliminated
 Evaluate the effective net charges per unit
area (C/cm2) on the flat band voltage
 Consider a +ve sheet charge per unit area
Qo within the oxide  induce –ve charges
(partly in metal, partly in semicond.) (fig. (a))
 Resulting field distribution  assumed
that there is no work function difference
(qms=0)
 To reach a flat band condition (no charge
induced)  apply –ve voltage to metal (fig.
(b))
 As –ve voltage increases  more –ve
charges on the metal  electric field
distribution shift downward until the
electric field is zero (at surface)
 Area contained under the electric field
distribution corresponds to the flat-band
voltage VFB :
Effect of a sheet charge within the oxide.
(a) Condition for VG = 0.
(b) Flat-band condition.
VFB   o xo  
Qo
 ox
xo  
Qo xo
Co d
Qo Density of the sheet charge
xo Location within the oxide
 When sheet charge very close to metal  if xo=0 : induce no
charges, no effect on the flat band voltage
 When Qo very close to semiconductor  xo=d : it will exert its
max influence, give rise to a flat band voltage:
Q d
Q
VFB   o   o
Co d
Co
 Arbitrary space charge distribution within the oxide:
(x) : volume charge density in the oxide
ot(x) : volume charge density for oxide-trapped charges
m(x) : volume charge density for mobile ionic charges
1 d
Qot   x ot ( x)dx
d o
1 d
Qm   x m ( x)dx
d o
If qms0 & interface-trapped charges is negligible 
experimental C-V curve will be shifted from the ideal
theoretical curve by an amount :
VFB  ms 
(Q f  Qm  Qot )
Co
Important!
Effect of a fixed oxide charge and interface traps on the C-V characteristics
of an MOS diode.