Lecture 8: Reflection and Transmission of Waves
Download
Report
Transcript Lecture 8: Reflection and Transmission of Waves
1
Lecture 8: Reflection and
Transmission of Waves
Instructor:
Dr. Gleb V. Tcheslavski
Contact:
[email protected]
Office Hours:
Room 2030
Class web site:
www.ee.lamar.edu/gleb/e
m/Index.htm
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
So far, we have considered plane waves in an infinite homogeneous medium. A
natural question would arise: what happens if a plane wave hits some object?
Such object can be either dielectric or conductor.
To answer this question, we need to use boundary conditions. We study first
normal incidence on the boundary.
We assume that a plane wave is
generated in the region z < 0 in a
lossless material with dielectric
constant 1 and that a second lossless
material is in the region z 0 with a
dielectric constant 2. The
permeabilities of both materials are 0.
A portion of the wave is transmitted to
the medium 2, another portion is
reflected back to medium 1.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
2
3
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
The direction of wave’s propagation can be defined using a right hand rule. This
suggests that the polarization of the reflected field has to be altered after the
incident wave strikes the interface. We assume that the electric component is
unchanged, and the magnetic field will change its direction.
Therefore: Incident wave:
E y , i ( z , t ) Ai e
Reflected wave:
E y ,r ( z , t ) Br e
Transmitted wave:
E y , t ( z , t ) At e
j t k1 z
j t k1 z
j t k 2 z
(8.3.1)
(8.3.2)
(8.3.3)
Here, k1 and k2 are the wave numbers for the regions (media) 1 and 2
respectively, constants A and B indicate the terms propagating in the +z and –z
directions.
Since the materials are assumed as lossless, the waves will not attenuate (i.e.
= 0, = k). The magnetic field intensities can be found from the Maxwell’s
equations or by using the characteristic impedances for two regions.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
4
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
Incident wave:
Reflected wave:
Transmitted wave:
H x ,i ( z , t )
Ai
j t k1 z
Z c ,1
Br
H x ,r ( z , t )
e
e
j t k1 z
Z c ,1
H x ,t ( z , t )
At
e
Z c ,2
j t k 2 z
(8.4.1)
(8.4.2)
(8.4.3)
From the boundary conditions, the tangential components of the electric field must
be continuous and the tangential components of the magnetic field intensity must
differ by any surface current that is located at the interface. Usually, we assume
that there are no surface currents, which implies that the tangential components of
the magnetic field intensity are also continuous at the interface.
Also, since we chose the interface between two media to be at z = 0, the exponent
will be
j t kz
j t
e
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
z0
e
Fall 2008
(8.4.4)
5
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
Therefore, at the boundary z = 0, we can write:
E y , i ( z 0, t ) E y , r ( z 0, t ) E y , t ( z 0, t )
(8.5.1)
H x , i ( z 0, t ) H x , r ( z 0, t ) H x , t ( z 0, t )
(8.5.2)
Substituting the last results to (8.3.x) and (8.4.x), we obtain:
Ai B r At
Ai
Z c ,1
Br
Z c ,1
(8.5.3)
At
Z c ,2
Therefore, if one of three wave’s magnitudes is known, two other can be
computed.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
(8.5.4)
6
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
We specify the reflection and transmission coefficients as:
Reflection:
Transmission:
Br
Z c ,2 Z c ,1
Ai
Z c ,1 Z c ,2
At
2 Z c ,2
Ai
Z c ,1 Z c ,2
(8.6.1)
(8.6.2)
Knowing the characteristic impedances of the materials allows us to determine
the propagation characteristics and amplitudes of both waves: transmitted to the
second medium and reflected back. If the characteristic impedances on both
sides are equal, all energy is transmitted into region 2 and none is reflected
back. This is called matching the media (lenses, glasses etc.).
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
7
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
Since the characteristic impedance is:
Zc
(8.7.1)
For two dielectric materials:
Reflection:
Transmission:
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
1
2
1
2
1
Fall 2008
(8.7.2)
2 1
1
(8.7.3)
2
8
Normal incidence – propagating
waves (Example)
Example 7.1: Describe the expected reflectiontransmission characteristic of a time harmonic
EM wave normally incident at a layered
dielectric. Find the total reflection and
transmission coefficients of a single layer with
known thickness d and dielectric constants are
2 = r0; 1 = 3 = 0. Plot the frequency
dependence of these coefficients assuming d =
0.1 m and r = 4.
z
The amplitudes of the total transmitted and reflected fields are
E (z)
Et ( z )
n
3
n 1
wave index
Er (z)
(8.8.1)
n
E ( z ) 1
n 1
-z direction region number
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
(8.8.2)
Normal incidence – propagating
waves (Example)
The wave incident to the boundary with
the second medium is partially
reflected back and partially transmitted
to medium 2. At the interface between
materials 2 and 3, the transmitted to
material 2 field is partially reflected
back and partially transmitted to the
material 3, etc.
Ei
E i 1
Ei1
1
Ei 2
1
E i 1 2
The phase of individual terms in
summations is different: an additional
phase difference of k2d appears after
each crossing the slab.
We assume next that the reflection coefficient from the first interface is 1 in the
+z direction and -1 in the –z direction. Since the medium 3 is identical to medium
1, 2 = -1, and -2 = 1. Similarly, the transmission coefficient through the first
interface will be 1+ = 1 + 1 in the +z direction and 1- = 1 - 1 in the -z direction.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
9
10
Normal incidence – propagating
waves (Example)
The total reflected electric field is:
2
j2k d
j4k d
j6k d
E r ( z ) E i 1 1 2 1 e 2 1 2 1 2 1 e 2 1 2 1 2 1 e 2 ...
j2k d
2
2 j2k d
2 j2k d
E i 1 1 1 1 e 2 1 1 e 2 1 e 2
2
...
(8.10.1)
The total reflection coefficient is:
Er ( z)
Ei
1 12 e j 2 k 2 d
1 1
2 j2k d
1 1 e 2
1 1 e j 2 k 2 d
2 j2k d
1 1 e 2
(8.10.2)
Similarly, the total transmitted electric field is:
2
jk d
j3k d
j5k d
E t ( z ) E i 1 1 e 2 1 2 1 2 e 2 1 2 1 2 e 2 ...
jk d
2
2 j2k d
2 j2k d
E i 1 1 e 2 1 1 e 2 1 e 2
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
2
...
(8.10.1)
Normal incidence – propagating
waves (Example)
11
The total transmission coefficient is:
Et ( z )
1 e
Ei
2
1
1 e
The reflection coefficient of the first
boundary is:
1
1
1
r 1 2
r 1 2
1
(8.11.2)
3
The wave number in the slab:
k2
r k 2k
(8.11.3)
The frequency dependence of the total
transmission and reflection coeffs:
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
2
1
jk 2 d
j 2 k2d
(8.11.1)
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
12
What if the medium where the wave is propagating is lossy, i.e. 0?
The magnetic field must be:
H ( r ) j E ( r ) E ( r )
(8.12.1)
The Helmholtz equation is:
E (r ) E (r ) 0
2
2
(8.12.2)
where the complex propagation constant is:
j j
1 j
(8.12.3)
If the electric field is linearly polarized in the x direction, wave equation reduces to:
Ex (z)
2
x
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
2
Ex (z) 0
2
Fall 2008
(8.12.4)
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
13
The solution will be in form:
Ex (z) E e
z
E e
z
(8.13.1)
Traveling exponentially decaying waves
The first term – a wave propagating in +z direction:
E e
z
E e
z
e
j z
The magnetic field will be:
H y (z)
E e
z
E e
z
(8.13.3)
Zc
Alternatively, loss can be incorporated by:
0; ' j "
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
E e
(8.13.4)
Fall 2008
z
co s t z
(8.13.2)
14
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
If the material 2 is a good conductor, the characteristic impedance will be very
small and it would approach zero as the conductivity approaches infinity.
Therefore, it will be NO transmission of EM energy into the conductor, it all will
be reflected. In this case:
0
Polarization change
1
Considering the most general solution
(7.12.3) of the wave equation and a
traveling pulse instead of a time-harmonic
wave, we may assume that a virtual pulse
with a negative amplitude was launched
at z = + in the –z direction
simultaneously with the real pulse. Both
pulses meet at z = 0 at the time t = t + 3t
after that moment, they keep propagating
but the virtual pulse becomes real and
the real one becomes virtual.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
(8.14.1)
(8.14.2)
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
15
At the interface, the amplitudes of both pulses add up to equal zero in order to
satisfy the requirement that the tangential component of the electric field must
be zero at a perfect conductor.
Fields exist only in the region z < 0 (medium 1 – dielectric):
E ( z ) Ei ( z ) Er ( z ) E0 e
H (z) H i (z) H r (z)
E0
jk c z
e
Zc
e
jk c z
jk c z
e
u
jk c z
x
j 2 E 0 sin k c z u x
uy 2
E0
Zc
cos k c z
(8.15.1)
(8.15.2)
Note that at z =0: E(z) = 0 and H(z) = 2E0/Zc uy.
The Poynting vector for the first region (z < 0) will be:
S0 ( z)
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
1
2
E (z) H (z) j
*
2 E0
Zc
Fall 2008
2
cos k 0 z sin k 0 z u z
(8.15.3)
Normal incidence – propagating
waves
16
Since the Poynting’s vector has no real part, NO average power is
delivered to the region 2 (perfect conductor)!
The surface current on the conductor can be found from the boundary
conditions on the tangential magnetic field:
J s u z H ( z 0)
2 E0
Zc
ux
This is where “no metal plates in a microwave oven” comes from!
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
(8.16.1)
Normal incidence – propagating
waves (Example)
Example 7.2: Pulse radars can be used to determine the velocity of cars. Show
how such radars could work.
A repetitive EM pulse from the
radar is incident on the car.
Because of the high conductivity of
the car, the pulse is reflected back
to the radar where the total time of
travel t for the given pulse can be
estimated. The pulse repetition
time (the time between two
consecutive pulses) is t.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
17
18
Normal incidence – propagating
waves (Example)
During t, the car travels a distance z; therefore, the velocity of the car can be
estimated.
The difference
in arrival time
for two pulses
The velocity is:
t i t i 1
2L
c
v car
2( L z )
c
2z
c
c t i t i 1
2 t
2V car t
(8.18.1)
c
(8.18.2)
The actual distance between the car and the radar L is not important to determine
the car’s speed; although it can be computed as well.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
Oblique incidence – propagating
waves
When a plane EM wave incident at an oblique
angle on a dielectric interface, there are two cases
to be considered: incident electric field has
polarization parallel to the plane of incidence, and
incident electric field has polarization that is
perpendicular to the plane of incidence.
1. Parallel polarization:
The incident, reflected, and transmitted electric field
vectors lie in the plane of incidence: the x-z plane.
Note: the angles are measured with respect to normal.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
19
Oblique incidence – propagating
waves
Incident wave:
E i E 0 cos i u x sin i u z e
Hi
Reflected wave:
jk1 x sin i z cos i
E0
Z c1
u ye
jk1 x sin r z cos r
E0
Z c2
u ye
jk 2 x sin t z cos t
Fall 2008
(8.20.1)
(8.20.2)
jk1 x sin r z cos r
E t E 0 cos t u x sin t u z e
Ht
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Z c1
u ye
E r E 0 cos r u x sin r u z e
Hr
Transmitted wave:
E0
jk1 x sin i z cos i
20
(8.20.3)
(8.20.4)
jk 2 x sin t z cos t
(8.20.5)
(8.20.6)
21
Oblique incidence – propagating
waves
From the boundary conditions: i.e., continuity of tangential electric and magnetic
fields at the interface z = 0, we derive:
cos i e
jk1 x sin i
e
cos r e
jk1 x sin i
Z c1
e
jk1 x sin r
jk1 x sin r
cos t e
e
Z c1
jk 2 x sin t
(8.21.1)
jk 2 x sin t
(8.21.2)
Z c2
To satisfy these conditions, the Snell’s laws of reflection and refraction must hold:
i r ;k1 sin i k 2 sin t
(8.21.3)
These simplifications lead to:
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Z c 2 cos t Z c 1 cos i
Z c 2 cos t Z c 1 cos i
2 Z c 2 cos i
Z c 2 cos t Z c 1 cos i
Fall 2008
(8.21.4)
(8.21.5)
Oblique incidence – propagating
waves
22
For parallel polarization, a special angle of incidence exists, known as the
Brewster’s angle, or polarizing angle, i = B, for which the reflection
coefficient is zero: = 0.
It happens when
Z c 2 cos t Z c 1 cos i
(8.22.1)
Therefore:
1
sin B
1
1
2
If the incidence angle equals to Brewster’s angle, the reflected field will be
polarized perpendicularly to the plane of incidence.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
(8.22.2)
23
Oblique incidence – propagating
waves
1. Perpendicular polarization:
The incident, reflected, and transmitted electric field vectors are perpendicular to
the plane of incidence: the x-z plane.
Incident wave:
Ei E0u y e
Hi
Reflected wave:
E0
Z c1
E0
Z c2
jk1 x sin i z cos i
jk1 x sin r z cos r
cos r u x sin r u z e
Et E0u y e
Ht
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Z c1
(8.23.1)
cos i u x sin i u z e
E r E0u y e
Hr
Transmitted wave:
E0
jk1 x sin i z cos i
(8.23.3)
jk1 x sin r z cos r
jk 2 x sin t z cos t
cos t u x sin t u z e
Fall 2008
(8.23.2)
(8.23.4)
(8.23.5)
jk 2 x sin t z cos t
(8.23.6)
24
Oblique incidence – propagating
waves
From the continuity of tangential electric and magnetic fields at the interface z =
0, we again derive:
e
cos i e
jk1 x sin i
jk1 x sin i
e
jk1 x sin r
cos r e
Z c1
e
jk 2 x sin t
jk1 x sin r
(8.24.1)
cos t e
Z c1
jk 2 x sin t
(8.24.2)
Z c2
As before, the Snell’s laws of reflection and refraction must hold:
i r ;k1 sin i k 2 sin t
(8.24.3)
These simplifications lead to very similar expressions:
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Z c 2 cos i Z c 1 cos t
Z c 2 cos i Z c 1 cos t
2 Z c 2 cos i
Z c 2 cos i Z c 1 cos t
Fall 2008
(8.24.4)
(8.24.5)
Oblique incidence – propagating
waves
A magnitude of the reflection
coefficient for the parallel and
perpendicular polarization:
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
25
26
Oblique incidence – propagating
waves
Total internal reflection and surface waves
Assume that the uniform plane wave incident on an interface between two
perfect dielectrics with k1 > k2, for instance, water to air. From the Snell’s law:
2
cos t
k1
2
1
sin
i
k2
(8.26.1)
For a particular angle of incidence, the quantity under the square root
becomes zero. This angle is called critical angle:
c sin
1
k2
(8.26.2)
k1
At the incidence angles exceeding the critical angle, the phenomenon of
total internal reflection occurs.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
27
Oblique incidence – propagating
waves
Let us denote:
cos t j , w hen i c
(8.27.1)
In both cases of parallel and perpendicular polarization, the
reflection coefficient will be:
j
j
(8.27.2)
Here, both and are real. As a consequence, the magnitude of the reflection
coefficient || = 1, and all incident power is reflected off the interface.
As a result, for instance for the perpendicular polarization, the transmitted
electric field is:
Et T E 0u y e
z
e
jk 2 x sin i
(8.27.3)
If the incidence angle exceeds the critical angle, the field in region 2 propagates
in the x direction but rapidly exponentially decays in the z direction – away from
the interface. This is a surface wave.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves
28
Let us consider again the electric component of a linearly polarized EM field
normally incident on a perfect conductor with a reflection coefficient = -1.
j ( t kz )
j ( t kz )
R e B e j t e jkz e jkz
E y ( z , t ) R e B e
e
R e j 2 Be
j t
sin kz
E y ( z , t ) A sin t sin kz
Where A = 2B.
The tangential electric field Ey(z,t) = 0 at the interface z = 0. In this case, the
signal consisting of two oppositely propagating waves appears to be
stationary in space and oscillating in time. This is a standing wave.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
(8.28.1)
Fall 2008
(8.28.2)
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves
The standing wave results
from the constructive and
destructive interference of
the two counter
propagating waves.
Observe that the
separation distance
between two successive
null points (nodes) equals
to the separation distance
between two successive
maxima (antinodes) and
equals to one half of the
wavelength.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
29
30
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves (Example)
Example 7.3: An EM wave propagating in a vacuum in the region z < 0 is normally
incident upon a perfect conductor at z = 0. The frequency of the wave is 3 GHz,
the amplitude of incident electric field is 10 V/m, and it is polarized in the uy
direction. Find the phasor and the instantaneous expressions for the incident and
the reflected field components.
k
2 f
2 3 10
3 10
c
The incident field
in the phasor form:
Ei ( z ) Ae
H i (z)
Or:
jkz
Ei ( z , t ) R e Ei ( z )e
H i ( z , t ) R e H i ( z )e
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Zc
j t
20 m
8
u y 10 e
u z Ei ( z )
9
j 20 z
10
120
10
1 2 0
Fall 2008
(8.30.1)
u y V m
e
j 20 z
10 cos 6 10
j t
1
(8.30.2)
u x A m
(8.30.3)
20 z u y V m
(8.30.4)
cos 6 10 20 z u x A m
(8.30.5)
9
9
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves (Example)
31
The reflected field in the phasor form:
E r ( z ) E i ( z ) 10 e
H i (z)
u z Er ( z)
Zc
j 20 z
u y V m
10
120
e
j 20 z
(8.31.1)
u x A m
(8.31.2)
Or in the instantaneous form:
E r ( z , t ) R e E r ( z )e
j t
H r ( z , t ) R e H r ( z )e
10 cos 6 10
j t
10
1 2 0
9
20 z u y V m
cos 6 10 20 z u x A m
9
Constructive and destructive interference will lead to appearance of
a standing wave.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
(8.31.3)
(8.31.4)
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves
Examination of a standing wave suggests that it should be possible to insert
another conductor (a conductive wall) at any of the nodes where the tangential
electric field is zero without changing a structure of electric field!
The applicable boundary condition, therefore, is that the tangential electric field
must be zero at a conductive surface.
Let us assume that the plates were
inserted instantaneously and the EM
energy was “trapped” between the
plates.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
32
33
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves
For the 1D Helmholtz equation
2
d E y (z)
dz
2
k E y (z) 0
2
(8.33.1)
and a time-harmonic signal, the solution will be in a form:
E y ( z ) A sin kz B cos kz
(8.33.2)
The integration constants A and B can be found from the boundary condition
that the tangential electric field must be zero at a metal wall. Therefore, B = 0,
k
n
(8.33.3)
L
where n is an integer (resonator mode) and L is the distance between the metal
walls. If the maximum magnitude of electric field is Ey0, the electric field is
n z
E y ( z ) E y 0 sin
L
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
(8.33.4)
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves
The structure consisting of a parallel plate cavity is called a Fabry-Perot
resonator. If the frequency of a wave “matches” the dimensions of the
resonator (a resonant frequency) – the length of cavity equals an integer
number of half-wavelengths – a standing wave will be formed. All other
frequency components will be canceled out by a destructive
interference.
The Q-factor (2 ratio of stored energy to
the power dissipated per cycle) of this
resonator may be very high (approaches
a million).
Fabry-Perot resonators are widely used
in EM and optics: a He-Ne laser is
basically a Fabry-Perot resonator.
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
34
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves
35
Recall that the wave number is a function of
frequency and the velocity of light between
plates.
n
(8.35.1)
k r
c
L
Therefore, we can find the resonant
frequency as
n
r
L 0
(8.35.2)
Considering two resonators of the same length L but one of the filled with air
(left) and the other filled with a dielectric , we can find that they will resonate at
two different frequencies. The frequency difference will be
r1 r 2
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
n
L
Fall 2008
1
00
r 0 0
1
(8.35.3)
36
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves
The resonant frequency for a free space (or air) can be computed or measured
for known resonator’s dimensions. The relative frequency difference is
r1
1
r2
r1
1
1
r
(8.36.1)
Therefore, if we can measure this frequency difference, we can estimate the
permittivity of unknown material placed in the resonator and, thus, identify the
material.
Example 7.4: An empty Fabry-Perot resonator has a resonant
frequency of 35 GHz. Determine the thickness of a sheet of
paper that is inserted later between the plates if the resonant
frequency changes to 34.99 GHz. The separation between
plates is 50 cm. Assume that the integer n specifying the
mode doesn’t change and that there is no reflection from the
paper.
paper 3
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves (Example)
37
The relative dielectric constant separating the plates with paper inserted can
be approximated as
r
L L
va cu u m p a p er a d d ed
Therefore:
va cu u m
L
L
paper
1
1
r
L
1
35 34.99
35
1 paper 1
1 p a p er 1
L
2 0.5
(3 1)
4
L 1.4 10 m
Fall 2008
(8.37.1)
L
1
Finally:
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
L
L
L
2L
p a p er
1 (8.37.2)
L
(8.37.3)
Fabry-Perot resonator – standing
waves (Example)
Example 7.5: A helium-neon laser emits light at a wavelength of 6328 Å in air.
Calculate the frequency of oscillation of the laser, the period of oscillation, and
the wave number. 1 Å (Åmgstrom) = 10-10 m.
The frequency:
f
c
2.998 10
6.328 10
8
4.738 10 H z 473.8TH z
14
7
The period:
T
1
f
1
4.738 10
2.11 10
14
15
s 2.11 fs
The wave number:
k
2
2
6.328 10
9.93 10 m
6
7
??QUESTIONS??
ELEN 3371 Electromagnetics
Fall 2008
1
38