Transcript reported

GCOOS HF Radar Gap Analysis
Version 1.0, 27 June 2008
• Key Authors
– Stephan Howden, USM
– Nick Shay, UM
– Ann Jochens, TAMU
• Consulted with
– GCOOS-RA Board of Directors
– Harvey Seim, SECOORA
All RA HFR Gap Analyses available at
http://www.usnfra.org/committees.html
GCOOS Network of HF Radar Observing
Systems for Surface Currents and Waves
•
Continue operations of the existing operational High Frequency Radar
(HFR) network (6 units) in the GCOOS region;
•
Determine the status of units that once were operational and whether
such units can be incorporated into the GCOOS HFR network;
•
Develop a more complete understanding of quality control and quality
assurance issues for different HFR systems and how to ensure
compatibility and ability to combine measurements from different HFR
systems; and
•
Develop for the Gulf a plan for choosing particular HFR station types,
operating frequencies, locations, and infrastructure plans for each site.
Gaps
•
Long-Range (>75 km range) HFR:
– No operational long-range HFR stations from Brownsville, TX, to Gulfport,
MS (approximately 750 mi).
– USM 's long-range HFR stations cover the region from Gulfport, MS, to
Destin, FL.
– Another gap exists from Destin, FL, to Redington Shores, FL (approximately
450 mi).
– USF's long-range HFR stations cover the region from Redington Shores to
Naples, FL.
– The region between Naples, FL, down to the Keys (~ 250 mi) and over into
the Miami, FL, area is the last GCOOS gap.
•
Short- and Medium-Range HFR: There is insufficient funding to cover
the entire Gulf Coast with these radars; only selected areas.
Priorities for HFR Network
•
•
•
•
Cover the US Gulf Coast by long-distance (>75 km) radar systems with overlapping
coverage sufficient to estimate 2-D surface current fields in these regions.
Install HFR equipment that can also measure directional wave information where affordable
Nest higher frequency radar systems within selected regions for higher spatial and temporal
resolution systems is to cover regions with substantial ship and boat traffic.
– 6 NOAA Physical Oceanographic Real-Time System (PORTS)
• Houston/Galveston, TX,
• Sabine Neches, TX,
• Gulfport, MS,
• Pascagoula, MS,
• Tampa Bay, FL
– Southwest Pass of the Mississippi River
– Corpus Christi, TX
– Miami, FL
Conduct pilot project to determine how to combine data from different HF radars into a Gulf
coastal surface current map
36 HF Radar Sites
Location and Year of Deployment
Texas
Louisiana
Mississippi
Alabama
Florida
Est. Cost
Tentative
Institution
Year 1 - LR
Year 2 - LR
Year 3 - LR
Year 4 - SMR
TAM U
LSU
USM
DISL
FSU/UWF
FSU
USF
UM
3 East*
1 West*
none
none
2 Panhandle
none
none
none
$1,840,020
2 South
2 East
none
none
none
2 Big Bend**
none
none
$1,873,950
1 South
4 Central
none
none
none
1 Big Bend
none
none
$1,901,790
none
1 West
2 Pascagoula
2 Mobile Bay
none
none
2 N Central
none
$2,245,235
Year 5 ΠSMR
2 Sabine Neches
2 Miss Riv (LR)
2 Gulfport
none
none
none
none
none
$1,985,455