WP1 Report in Forum (PartII)
Download
Report
Transcript WP1 Report in Forum (PartII)
Hinterland data-base / 1
Quantitave:
1)number of inhabitants
2)number of inhabitants in age groups
(minimum: 5 groups with: below 6/below 15/ below
20/below 65/65 and more); standard: groups in 5
years steps: 0 - below 5, 5 - below 10 etc.)
3)size of families/households
4)number of inhabitants employed/unemployed
number of employed inhabitants in agriculture and
forestry
5)number and size (employed persons) of nonagriculture/non-forestry enterprises
6)number of emigrated people within the last 5 years
7)registration of direct relationships of households in
the rural settlement or in the close neighbourhood
(up to 15 km)
Hinterland data-base /2
Qualitative: a questionnaires
• for local development actors to evaluate local resources
(local area profile);
• for age, size and relationships of households;
• for the small number of immigrants and for the
experiences after removal ti the rural zone;
• local politicians and administration to point out the ability
to manage future;
• for aged people above 65 years to find out the attitides
related to their villages property and the ability and
willingness to maintain it;
Hinterland typology
• A general typology for all PP regions;
• An individual typology.
A map – based information system (GIS) to
collect data about location, condition and
historical values of residences in villages.
Development of relative population figure
Region
Havelland-Flaeming
Berlin
Development of relative population figure
Expressed as a percentage
under
to
to
to
to
above
The first information
about the risk of
abandoned houses can
be taken from the
expected demographic
development. The
higher the rate of
decline (red colours),
the more vacant and
abandoned houses and
villages must be
expected.
This picture should to be changed
by a map of your region, showing
the spatial forecast of population
and the municipalities with the
highest rates of decline
INTERREG-III-B
HINTERLAND
work package:
HINTERLAND-KNOW HOW and
HINTERLAND-Types
weak declining
?
strong declining
- stable ?
- instable ?
- stable ?
- instable ?
HINTERLAND-Types
Criteria:
The settlements social economical situation
• Very good (5 points);
• Good (4 points);
• Satisfactory (3 points, average of the
region/country/Hinterland);
• Bad (2 points);
• Very bad (1 point).
Thank you for attention...
Ačiū už dėmesį...