Transcript PPT

It is not the strongest of the species that survives,
nor is it the most intelligent…
but the one most responsive to change
Charles Darwin
General Approach:
BEFORE hardware purchase / installation
Partner with I.T. and Telecommunications


Ask for demo units from vendors and TEST
them onsite!
Assess your I.T. infrastructure (see handout )
 Have blueprints available for sites where
VMI will be implemented

You will have to map the location of ports
and electrical outlets in order to place units
effectively
OR


You will have to map the location of
electrical outlets in order to INSTALL ports
convenient to said outlets
Assess the phones currently in use by your
providers
 Only digital, multi-directional phones will
work with this technology


Most of the phone sets in out-patient clinics
are inexpensive, analog and unidirectional
(This will NOT work)
Do the provider phones have conference
capability?
General Approach:
AFTER hardware purchase / installation
AVOID sub-optimal adoptions and
utilization


Train your providers rigorously!
Have super-users identified from both
groups (provider and interpreter) to help
champion use
 Be willing to park someone on site the
first week of implementation to hand
hold providers/users
Have a strategic, enterprise level plan

Stay focused on dramatic improvements
in clinical practice
General Specs for IT
There are many technical aspects to the project and even
more technical obstacles that we've been able to
overcome. I would say that anyone who is interested in
doing such a project, make sure they have the support of
technical engineering staff. Also, make sure that those
engineering staff have a fairly in depth knowledge of PBX
technology (including Call Center expertise), Video over IP
technology, and Data Networking. Without in house
expertise in all those areas, they could very well find
themselves in a less than desirable situation with
performance issues and an unstable application.
Have someone from telecommunications and someone
from IT as part of the task force that researches hardware
options, purchases same, and then installs and rolls out
the service for your facility.
I've attached a drawing of our network supporting the VMI
application. It shows the HMC Data network, the UW
PBX, and the Interpreter Services Call Center and how
they are linked. There is a missing line in my drawing, that
has become ever so important since our deployment of the
system, but is one component I underestimated when
doing the initial design. That is the telephonic interpreting
link which would be represented by a line going from an
HMC PBX phone, through the HMC PBX, over to the UW
PBX, and then to the Interpreter Services call center.
Our network is actually considerably more complex than
the drawing, but that has more to do with the intricate
inter-networking between HMC and UW, and our hopefully
temporary PBX, Node UWD, that we are running due to
necessary PBX software levels.
Video technology:
•
The general things to watch out for on the technical side
though are as follows:
•
Make sure to use high quality video endpoints.
•
•
•
Interpreter Services is currently using High
Definition Polycom HDX4000 endpoints for the
interpreters, and more affordable Standard
Definition Polycom V700 units for the mobile carts
All of our VMI interpreters are currently using
headsets manufactured by KOSS (model S/B 45)
This makes the Interpreter call center HD-capable,
should we decide in the future to upgrade the mobile
units to HD (or simply implement HD mobile endpoints in
later phases). Either way, an institution that wanted to
implement a video call center should trial different video
units before purchasing. This will ensure that they have
the correct expectations in terms of video quality and
also when they start using their units.
Audio quality:
Aside from the audio issues we experienced with the
audio-only sessions, the video technology we selected
uses wideband audio codecs (protocols).
•
So for video calls between mobile and interpreter
video endpoints, the range of audio frequencies
that are transmitted captures a much larger (2 to 3
times more) portion of the true human voice
compared to the audio only calls which are limited
by the narrowband codecs of a traditional phone
system.
•
Being able to hear the full frequency range of a
conversation is especially important in interpreting
applications, and is one very significant advantage
of your video application over regular telephonic
interpreting. Wideband audio codecs increase
clarity and understanding as well as reduce
interpreter strain. When using narrowband
frequencies on a regular phone call, your brain
must work very hard to piece together the missing
frequencies based on the limited shadow
frequencies (also called harmonic frequencies)
that are actually transmitted over the plain phone
network.
•
For Asian languages in particular, which are tonal
and traditionally had the higher overtones cut off
by regular telephone audio transmission, there is
no cut-off of the higher frequencies, making
comprehension that much easier for both sides.
Network Infrastructure:
HMC benefits from the very robust and high capacity data
network managed for us by the UW.
• We have Gigabit uplinks between all of the HMC subnets
and the core routers.
• In addition, for the audio only calls that have to travel
between the UW and HMC, we are utilizing a special
voice only data network that we call the Blue Network.
I would suggest to any possible implementers of this type of
solution that they either make sure they have very large
connections within their network infrastructure and lots of
available capacity between their endpoints with virtually no
latency, jitter, or packet loss (under 50ms for latency and jitter,
and less than 1% for packet loss). Or that they are
implementing a VLAN segregated video-only network
infrastructure or Quality of Service to ensure that video/audio
packets are not subject to normal data network congestion
that could affect the quality of a video or audio call.
I do have to say that Polycom HDX technology does have a
special LPR protocol that allows it to handle lost packets
much more effectively than other video endpoints.
Usually tech people also ask about bandwidth constraints
• Right now, our audio only calls are using approximately
80kbps bi-directional for each call,
• Video calls are using approximately 400kbps bidirectional for each call.
• If HMC Interpreter Services decides to upgrade to High
•
Definition mobile endpoints in the future, we will then be
using 2 Mbps bi-directional streams.
This is still only 0.2% of the total bandwidth available
within the core network infrastructure of Gigabit Ethernet.
Call Center technology:
One of the successes and major advantages of the HMC
VMI application is the use of call center technology to
provide flexibility for interpreters and intelligent routing for
calls from doctors and patients.
•
•
Giving you the ability to have any interpreter sit down at
any station and log in by name to associate the
language or languages you speak to that particular
station not only makes the solution more effective, but
also scaleable for future expansion.
Having to create rigid language based stations wouldn't
work in our environment (especially given the limited real
estate), and I doubt it would work for many other
institutions facing similar constraints.
Handling the call with a queue instead of just hunting from
station to station ringing endlessly improves the customer
experience.
•
•
•
We are also able to provide you with Holiday and time of
day handling, announcements that could be tweaked
later to give patients useful information,
and overflow handling to Pacific Interpreters to ensure
that patients are given interpreting service appropriately
no matter the situation.
The ability to combine this call center technology with
high quality video endpoints is the advantage we've
been able to achieve using the UW Avaya
Communication Manager PBX and the Polycom HDX
and V700 endpoints.
PBX Requirements:
The PBX requirement for video call centers is that you must
be using at least CM 4.0 and preferably CM 5.0 on any
Avaya PBX used for this application.
•
Using the Avaya PBX also has allowed us to combine
our telephonic and video interpreting call centers into a
single call center, since the underlying system handling
both is the very same Avaya PBX.
•
Stand alone video solutions that do not use a PBX
would not be able to receive and handle calls from
regular phone users at HMC.
•
One last note, if using an Avaya-Polycom solution, they
will need to make sure they purchase the Maximum
Video Capable H.323 Stations licensing for the Avaya
PBX, and the Avaya-enabling Key Code license for the
Polycom endpoints.
•
Both those licenses are needed in order to allow the
Polycom unit register with the Avaya PBX.