Transcript 20151124_34th_IG_TSOs_Presentation_V7

Enagás, GRTgaz, REN and TIGF
34th IG meeting
24th November 2015
II. CMP: common methodology of
OSBB in the Region
Topics to be included
1. Offer of additional capacity
Restrictions not to offer additional capacity
The additional capacity will not be offered in the following cases:
NEW •
If there is an up-stream or downstream operator’s communication with a restriction in
the physical-capacity.
•
If a special operation has been agreed among either the operators or by the
interconnection.
•
In emergency situations that could activate or deactivate other processes or
agreements between the interconnection operators.
•
In the event of system failures of the operators or shippers, which could lead to
incidents during the additional capacity supply process.
•
If the operators take the duly justified decision to intervene in the methodology by
lowering the value of the final quantity to be supplied for a certain day D.
•
The transmission network operators will prepare and issue a report to the relevant
NRAs, including details of the days on which the additional capacity supply process has
not been activated, along with the causes of said non-activation.
3
2. Technical & commercial measures
To reverse the order of the measures
Proposal:
1. Interruption of the interruptible capacities under the following order:
a) Within day interruptible capacity (overnomination)
b) Daily interruptible capacity
c) Monthly interruptible capacity
d) Quarterly interruptible capacity
e) Yearly interruptible capacity
2. Management of the OBA
4
3. CFO mechanism
Disadvantages
• If a TSO uploads at PRISMA a bundled “proposal to buy”, it seems that the
adjacent TSO does not need to confirm the proposal to buy.
• If this is the case, the following paragraph should be deleted:
The “proposal to buy” placed by a TSO (the one in charge to place it will
vary as explained above) shall always be approved by the adjacent TSO
at PRISMA platform.
The “proposal to buy” must be created and validated by the TSOs at
PRISMA platform at 19:30 UTC at latest (or 18:30 UTC daylight saving).
If no proposal has been created or no validation has been done, then
TSOs will apply pro-rata rule to all firm capacity already sold. Pro-rata will
also apply if there is a rejection of the proposal made by the adjacent
TSO. This is due to there is not enough time both to create and to
validate a new “proposal to buy”.
5
3. CFO mechanism
Information to be uploaded at PRISMA
• The identity of the network user applying
• The concerned interconnection point and direction of flow
• The price, which shall not be higher than the maximum price specified by the
TSOs in the “proposal to buy”. Offers to sell with a price higher than the
maximum price shall not be accepted. The price will be considered as the
maximum price the buyer is willing to pay
NEW
• The amount of capacity to sell. The “offers to sell” shall be greater than zero,
but may neither exceed the respective NU’s nominated capacity for that day
nor the TSO’s buy-back capacity offer
6
3. CFO mechanism
Market based procedure: Pro-rata rule
• If users do not offer enough capacity in the buy-back procedure (i.e. there are
not enough “offers to sell” to satisfy the “proposal to buy”), TSOs will reduce
all firm bundled and unbundled capacities according to a pro-rata rule up to
the amount of capacity that needs to be bought back
NEW •
NEW
Pro-rata rule will apply to all network users who nominated their booked
capacity, no matter if they already placed a “proposal to sell” from 19:30 UTC
(or 18:30 UTC daylight saving) to 20:00 UTC (or 19:00 UTC daylight saving).
The pro-rata rule will apply to those network users, even when their “proposal
to sell” was taken into account and, consequently, TSOs bought back some of
their nominated capacity
• In the case a pro-rata rule is applied, TSO shall pay network users for the prorated capacity the daily regulated tariff, which is applicable the day of the
opening of the buy-back procedure
7
3. CFO mechanism
Non-market based procedure: Pro-rata rule
NEW
No other market based procedure shall be performed afterwards if the TSOs
need to buy-back capacity after 20:00 UTC (or 19:00 UTC daylight saving):
•
TSOs will restrict network user’s renomination rights upwards and
downwards in both flow directions until the end of the gas day, and
•
Pro-rata rule shall be applied. TSOs will reduce firm bundled and unbundled
capacities according to a pro-rata rule
8
4. Price
Maximum price Enagás is allowed to pay
Clarification:
The price is set as a multiplier of the tariffs to be applied; thus, the price is
the daily reference price + 25% of the daily reference price.
9
5. Under evaluation
Uploading buy-back offers by TSOs through CFO mechanism
-
Upload of buy-back offers is a manual procedure done by one TSO - evaluation of
automatic IT connection needed
-
After uploading, the adjacent TSO receives a trade notification allowing him to
validate the capacity offer uploaded
-
If the offer is not correct (mistaken value uploaded), he can reject the offer, but time
may lack in order to upload another proposal
Application of a pro-rata rule
-
CFO mechanism only allows for a complete acceptance or rejection of selling offers
by NUs - no pro-rata rule embedded in the mechanism
-
Application of pro-rata rule must be performed outside PRISMA, unless CFO
mechanism is adapted (needs prior evaluation by PRISMA, including cost
estimation)
10
5. Under evaluation
In brief:
•
•
•
CFO mechanism is suited for secondary market trading - TSOs act as a shipper
when using it for BB procedure, with “some” limitations
Allocation of several offers placed by NU limited to situations where offers do not
have to be pro-rated
Changing current features by PRISMA requires investment (to be covered by TSOs)
and development time (by PRISMA and TSO’s IT systems)
Conclusion:
 TSOs
are looking for a way to overcome such limitations,
maintaining transparency, cost and time constraints as fundamental
vectors
 Other
alternative mechanisms envisaged could be FCFS, Reverse
Auction, etc.
 NRA’s to be updated and decide upon the possible alternatives
11
III. Interoperability NC.
Latest developments and next steps
in the Region
1. Implementation of the INT NC
Latest developments:
• Nomination, re-nomination and matching procedures (according to the BAL
NC and INT NC) are already implemented
• Data exchange:
•
An Integrated Data Exchange solution (HTTP/S-SOAP, Edig@s-XML) has been implemented
for the TSO-TSO communication.
•
For the TSO-Network User communication, both an Integrated Data Exchange solution and an
Interactive Data Exchange solution are already offered in the majority of the cases.
• Reference temperature (capacity and nominations) already in place for IPs
Ongoing developments:
• Bilateral discussions to review (if needed) the Interconnection Agreements
according to the content of NC
• Short term monitoring on gas quality: data publication (Wobbe-index
and gross calorific value) – Trying to harmonise the publication as much as
possible
13
IV. Infrastructures
IV.1 Update of the second list of
PCIs in the Region
IV.1 Update of the second list of PCIs in the Region
• This first ranking was discussed on the last regional group meeting
on 14th of September, based on CBA results;
• The final list was published on the 18th of November by the EC and
includes 76 gas projects;
• The projects included in the 2nd PCI list related to the region are:
 3rd Interconnection Point between Portugal and Spain (PCI 5.4);
 Midcat project (PCI 5.5);
 Obergailbach Interconnection Point (PCI 5.6);
 Val de Saône Pipeline between Etrez and Voisines (PCI 5.7.1);
 Gascogne-Midi Pipeline (PCI 5.7.2);
 Est Lyonnais pipeline between Saint-Avit and Etrez (PCI 5.8.1);
 Eridan pipeline between Saint-Martin-de-Crau and Saint-Avit (PCI
5.8.2).
16
IV.1 Update of the second list of PCIs in the Region
Infrastructures submitted to the
TYNDP 2015
CS Chopy
Obergailbach
GRTgaz
(TRAN-N-047)
CS Evy
CS Voisines
CS VoisinesMorelmaison
VAL DE SAONE GRTgaz
(TRA-N-043)
3rd IP
REN 1st Phase
(TRAN-N-283)
MidCat
TIGF
(TRAN-N-252)
Gascogne-Midi Gascogne Midi
TIGF
GRTgaz
(TRAN-N-331)
(TRAN-N-391)
Lupiac-Barran
3rd
IP
REN 2nd Phase
(TRAN-N-284)
CeloricoSpanish border
CS Zamora
CS
Cantanhede
CantanhedeMangualde
3rd IP
REN 3rd Phase
(TRAN-N-285)
ERIDAN
(TRAN-F-041)
Gascogne-Midi CS Montpellier
Zamora-Portuguese
border
Loop CastelnouVillar de Arnedo
ARC LYONNAIS
(TRAN-N-253)
CS Saint-Martin
de Crau
Spanish border-Barbaira
Figueras-French border
3rd IP
Enagás
(TRAN-N-168)(*)
Hostalrich-Figueras
MidCat
GRTgaz
(TRAN-N-256)
CS Martorell
Loop Tivisa-Arbós
MidCat
Enagás
(TRAN-N-161)
(*) Additionally core network reinforcements are needed in the Spanish system
17
IV.1 Update of the second list of PCIs in the Region
Grouping simulated at the PS-CBA: GR_25_WEST
3rd IP
REN 3rd Phase
(TRAN-N-285)
(TRA-N-284)
18
IV.1 Update of the second list of PCIs in the Region
Grouping simulated at the PS-CBA: GR_21_C_WEST
19
IV.1 Update of the second list of PCIs in the Region
Grouping simulated at the PS-CBA: GR_22_WEST
Val de Saône GRTgaz
(TRA-N-043)
Gascogne-Midi GRTgaz
(TRA-N-391)
Gascogne-Midi TIGF
(TRA-N-331)
20
IV.2 Update of the infrastructures
status of the OS 2013-2015
IV.2 Update of the infrastructures status of the OS 20132015
Interconnection
Biriatou
Review date: (dd/mm/yyyy):
1.1 Name of the infrastructure:
CS at the border
Technical characteristics:
Km
1.2 Name of the responsible TSO:
Enagás S.A.
1.3 Capacity with this infrastructure (GWh/day)
D(")
30/10/2015
P(MW)
2 ( 1+1) E le c t ric
M o to C o m pre s s o r,
a pro x. 6 M W
each
Winter Summer 1.4 Investment approved
by TSO (YES/NO)
Spain-France (Common Value) :
60
France-Spain (Common Value) :
0
YES
2.1Initial Planning
2.2 Updated forecast
2015
2015
A) Application Date
jun-08
sep-13
oct-13
B) Concession Date
Apr-2013
dic-14
dic-14
A) In previous review (%)
B) Current (%)
4.1 Engineering
72%
100%
4.2 Procurement
36%
100%
4.3 Construction
0%
85%
4.4 Commissioning
0%
0%
Starting operation date
Administrative milestones
3.1 Initial (promoter choice)
3.2 Environmental Assessment
3.3 Final (Authorisation for starting construction)
Project advance
(according to real works status)
Causes of delays (if applied)
Comments
22
IV.2 Update of the infrastructures status of the OS 20132015
Interconnection
BIRIATOU
Review date: (dd/mm/yyyy):
1.1 Name of the infrastructure:
Adour Artery
Technical characteristics:
Km 95
1.2 Name of the responsible TSO:
TIGF
1.3 Capacity with this infrastructure (GWh/day)
Spain-France (Common Value) :
France-Spain (Common Value) :
D(") 24
Winter Summer
60
65
0
10
15/11/2015
P(MW) 0
1.4 Investment approved
by TSO (YES/NO)
YES
2.1Initial Planning
2.2 Updated forecast (according to
Starting operation date
Q4 2015
Q4 2015
Administrative milestones
A) Application Date
2012
2012/2013
Q1 2014
B) Concession Date
2012
2012/2013
Q2 2014
A) In previous review (%)
B) Current (%)
4.1 Engineering
100%
100%
4.2 Procurement
100%
100%
4.3 Construction
25%
96%
4.4 Commissioning
0%
46%
3.1 Initial (promoter choice)
3.2 Environmental Assessment
3.3 Final (Authorisation for starting construction)
Project advance
real works status)
Causes of delays (if applied)
NA
Comments
Start Up Mid-December 2015
23
IV.2 Update of the infrastructures status of the OS 20132015
Interconnection
Compressor Station at
Chazelles
Review date: (dd/mm/yyyy):
1.1 Name of the infrastructure:
Comressor station at Chazelles
Technical characteristics:
Km
D(")
1.2 Name of the responsible TSO:
GRTgaz
1.3 Capacity with this infrastructure (GWh/day)
Spain-France (Common Value) :
France-Spain (Common Value) :
12/11/2015
P(MW) 3x12,5
Winter Summer 1.4 Investment approved by Yes
TSO (YES/NO)
175
70
2.1Initial Planning
2.2 Updated forecast (according
Starting operation date
01/04/2013
24/05/2013
Administrative milestones
A) Application Date
B) Concession Date
H2'07
2009
2010
01/09/2007
sept.-10
22/10/2010
A) In previous review (%)
B) Current (%)
3.1 Initial (promoter choice)
3.2 Environmental Assessment
3.3 Final (Authorisation for starting construction)
Project advance
to real works status)
4.1 Engineering
100%
4.2 Procurement
100%
4.3 Construction
100%
4.4 Commissioning
100%
Causes of delays (if applied)
technical issues on compressor
24
V. AOB and next meetings
V. GRIP
• The 5 TSOs (ENAGAS, GRTGaz, REGANOSA, REN and TIGF) did
the 1st telco on 13rd of October:
 Coordination of the GRIP: TIGF;
 Coordinator of the following GRIP: REN
26
Thank you for your attention!