Transcript Forest

Le concept « Real World Internet »
dans le projet SENSEI : applications et
enjeux socio-économiques
Fabrice Forest
Université Pierre Mendès-France - Umanlab
21 septembre 2010, INSA Lyon
« Quel Futur pour le Web »
Cluster ISLE – Web Intelligence
SENSEI
Sommaire
1. Le projet SENSEI
2. Concept et objectifs
3. Enquêtes de terrain
4. Scenarios
5. Résultats “Usages”
6. Résultats “business framework”
SENSEI
2
1 – SENSEI project
 SENSEI (Real World Dimension of the Network of the Future)
 Integrated Project (IP) in the EU’s Seventh Framework Programme in




Information and Communication Technology (ICT).
Budget over 23 million Euros / 1900 person-months
IP from Call 1, Challenge 1.1: The Network of the Future.
Started in January 2008 / end 2010
Consortium involves multi-disciplinary expertise split among 19 partners
from 12 European countries.
2.1 - SENSEI concept
 The overall objective of SENSEI is to integrate the Physical with the
Digital World of the Future Internet.
 SENSEI’s vision is to realize ambient intelligence in a future network
and service environment, and to integrate Wireless Sensor and Actuator
Networks (WSAN) efficiently into the Future Internet.
 In order to realize this vision of Ambient Intelligence in future networks
and services environment, heterogeneous wireless sensor and actuator
networks (WS&AN) have to be integrated into a common framework of
global scale and made available to services and applications via
universal service interfaces.
SENSEI
4
2.2 - Future Internet and SENSEI
SENSEI objective is to define a system and an architecture, with universal interfaces:
 To support a large number of WS&ANs, through a plug and play WS&ANs


SENSEI
interface
To be an enabler of applications, that process sensor data and its context
information, via the SENSEI service interface
To allow the connection of present and future networks, via the network
support interface
5
2.3 - Overview of essential roles in a SENSEI system
Resource user:
•Business players & processes
•Context-aware mobile services
•Control and monitoring applications
•Network management function, etc.
Resource:
• Sensor
• Actuator
• Processing components
• Management state, etc.
Resource provider
•WSAN island operator,
•Processing component provider
SENSEI
6
3.1 - Field inquiries: overview of the approach
SENSEI D1.3 - Business and Social Acceptance Studies for Open and
Enterprise Solutions
– Field inquiry – 37 interviews towards users and business stakeholders:
•
•
•
•
Building and home
City planning and design
Transport
Crisis management
– Assessment of the SENSEI
concept + design goals
– User and social acceptance
– Business value and roles
– Design recommendations
Online scenarios – www.ict-sensei.org
SENSEI
7
3.2 - Horizontalisation - SENSEI architecture will facilitate the horizontal reuse of
sensing, actuation and processing services for different applications.
3.3 - Privacy and Security - SENSEI architecture will protect the privacy of the users and
offer adequate security for its participating systems and also to the entities being observed
and acted upon
4 - Application scenarios
 SENSEI project has created some application scenarios for SENSEI
system.
 These scenarios concretize some applications that could be enabled by
SENSEI system
SENSEI
10
5.1 Usages – decisive adoption factors
Decisive societal acceptance factors
1. SENSEI feasibility : SENSEI seen as the combination of existing technologies in a consistent
framework
2. SENSEI in the users’ agenda :SENSEI framework expected by companies to support R&D
dynamics and to create new generation of applications
3. SENSEI key design goals : the whole set of SENSEI design goals works as an ecosystem
making sense as whole
4. SENSEI and innovation dynamics: SENSEI seen as an enabler for the innovation processes
and strategies of the companies (think cross domains, transcend the silos)
5. SENSEI and Future Internet: RWI vision transcends the current Internet of Things vision by
combining the Ambient Intelligence with the Future Networks
6. SENSEI ethics and privacy issues : RWI differs from the usual Big Brother nightmare
7. SENSEI and standardization issues : needed to make the SENSEI vision realistic. Should
avoid the stakeholders’ effort in standardization
8. SENSEI business roles and value: user acceptance not separable from the business
modelling and value networks analysis
SENSEI
11
5.2 – User and social acceptance
Ethics and privacy issues
•
The user perception of the RWI differs from the usual Big Brother nightmare (not negatively perceived
with regard to traditional privacy issues related to ubiquitous computing).
•
Horizontalisation: the distributed principle supports the idea of a neutral system in terms of societal and
human control (contrary of an Orwellian centralised system for social control).
•
Recent societal trends have changed the users’ perception of the privacy issues: Internet social networking
pushed back the limits of the personal privacy
•
Ongoing societal changes (environment and energy issues) motivate the development of frameworks to make
possible new types of societal schemes and large-scale applications to regulate them
•
This willingness of the users to share private data is strongly dependent on the robustness of reliable privacy
and security SENSEI mechanisms
SENSEI
12
6.1 SENSEI Business Framework
CMF
Business Roles & Relations - Values
Initial Draft Reference Model
System components
SMF
System
APD
SDP
Deployment
WOP
WSAN
COP
WSP
Contents Development
Local connectivity
3SP
Services
SSB
CXP
Services
Services
Remote
connectivity
ASP
Services
Services
ASC
3SC
Technical, regulatory & legal framework
SDO REG
LEG
ASS
Code
SMF
CMF
APD
SDP
COP
ASP
CXP
SSB
WOP
WSP
3SP
ASC
ASS
3SC
SDO
REG
LEG
Role
System Manufacturer
Component Manufacturer
Application Developer
System Deployer
Content Provider
Application Service Provider
Connectivity Provider
Sensor and Actuation Service Broker
WSAN Operator
WSAN Service Provider
3rd Party Service Provider
Application Service Consumer
Application Service Subscriber
3rd Party Service Consumer
Standards Development Organisation (SDO)
Regulatory Body
Legislative Body
6.5 Business Framework 3 Models for Business Logics
Resource Users
ASC
ASS
3SC
…
Application logic
ASP
ASP
ASP
SSB
SSB
ASP
TRADITIONAL
CENTRIC
BROKERING
SSB
DISTRIBUTED
BROKERING
SENSEI logic
Resource providers
WSP
COP
WOP
…
6.5 Business Framework 3 Models for Business Logics
Resource Users
ASC
ASS
3SC
…
Application logic
ASP
Now
CENTRIC
BROKERING
SSB
DISTRIBUTED
BROKERING
SENSEI logic
Resource providers
WSP
COP
WOP
ASP
Next
New
ASP
TRADITIONAL
ASP
…
SSB
SSB
Conclusion - Lifecycle scenarios to design SENSEI system for change
• Application scenarios used to anticipate the SENSEI deployment and lifecycle
• Scenarios involved RWI perspective from short, mid and to long term
• Different degrees of societal changes, business innovation and technology
progress
•  functional requirements for SENSEI system designed for change before/beyond
runtime
• SENSEI lifecycle scenarios for Smart City:
SENSEI
16
Thank you
www.sensei-project.eu
[email protected]
SENSEI
17