Transcript Peering

The Intersection of Grids and Networks:
Where the Rubber Hits the Road
William E. Johnston
ESnet Manager and Senior Scientist
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1
Objectives of this Talk
•
•
How a production R&E network works
Why some types of services needed by Grids /
widely distributed computing environments are hard
2
Outline
• How do Networks Work?
• Role of the R&E Core Network
• ESnet as a Core Network
•
o
ESnet Has Experienced Exponential Growth Since 1992
o
ESnet is Monitored in Many Ways
o
How Are Problems Detected and Resolved?
Operating Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
o
Disaster Recovery and Stability
o
Recovery from Physical Attack / Failure
o
Maintaining Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
in the Face of Cyberattack
• Services that Grids need from the Network
o
Public Key Infrastructure example
3
How Do Networks Work?
•
Accessing a service, Grid or otherwise, such as a
Web server, FTP server, etc., from a client computer
and client application (e.g. a Web browser_ involves
o
Target host names
o
Host addresses
o
Service identification
o
Routing
4
How Do Networks Work?
•
When one types “google.com” into a Web browser to
use the search engine, the following takes place
o
The name “google.com” is resolved to an Internet address
by the Domain Name System (DNS) – a hierarchical
directory service
o
The address is attached to a network packet (which
carries the data – a google search request in this case)
which is then sent out of the computer into the network
o
The first place that the packet reaches is a router that
must decide how to get that packet to its desitnatiion
(google.com)
5
How Do Networks Work?
o
In the Internet, routing is done “hot potato”
- Routers are in your site LANs and at your ISP, and
each router typically communicates directly with several
other routers
- The first router to receive your packet takes a quick
look at the address and says, if I send this packet to
router B that will probably take it closer to its
destination. So it sends it to B without further adieu.
- Router B does the same thing, and so forth, until the
packet reaches google.com
o
What makes this work is routing protocols that
exchange reachability information between all
directly connected routers – “BGP” is the most
common such protocol in WANs
6
How Do Networks Work?
•
Once the packet reaches its destination (the
computer called google.com) it must be delivered to
the google search engine, as opposed to the google
mail server that may be running on the same
machine.
o
This is accomplished with a service identifier that is put on
the packet by the browser (the client side application)
- The service identifier says that this packet is to be delivered to the
Web server on the destination system – on each system every
server/service has a unique identified called a “port number”
o
So when someone says that the Blaster/Lovsan worm is
attacking port 135 on the system called google.com, they
mean that a worm program somewhere in the Internet is
trying to gain access to the service at port 135 on
google.com (usually to exploit a vulnerability).
7
Role of the R&E Core Network: Transit (Deliver Every Packet)
LBNL
router
core
router
router
ESnet
(Core network)
border
router
gateway
router
core routers
•focus on highspeed packet
forwarding
core
router
border/gateway routers
•implement separate site and network
provider policy (including site firewall
policy)
peering
router
peering routers
•implement/enforce
routing policy for
each provider
•provide
cyberdefense
peering
router
Big ISP
(e.g. SprintLink)
router
router
router
router
router
router
Google, Inc.
8
Outline
• How do Networks Work?
• Role of the R&E Core Network
• ESnet as a Core Network
•
o
ESnet Has Experienced Exponential Growth Since 1992
o
ESnet is Monitored in Many Ways
o
How Are Problems Detected and Resolved?
Operating Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
o
Disaster Recovery and Stability
o
Recovery from Physical Attack / Failure
o
Maintaining Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
in the Face of Cyberattack
• Services that Grids need from the Network
o
Public Key Infrastructure example
9
What is ESnet
•
ESnet is a large-scale, very high bandwidth network
providing connectivity between DOE Science Labs
and their science partners in the US, Europe, and
Japan
•
Essentially all of the national data traffic supporting
US open science is carried by two networks – ESnet
and Internet-2 / Abilene (which plays a similar role
for the university community)
•
ESnet is very different from commercial ISPs
(Internet Service Providers) like Earthlink, AOL, etc.
o
o
Most big ISPs provide small amounts of bandwidth to a
large number of sites
ESnet supplies very high bandwidth to a small number of
sites
10
ESnet Connects DOE Facilities and Collaborators
CA*net4
KDDI (Japan)
France
Switzerland
Taiwan
(TANet2)
Australia
CA*net4
Taiwan
(TANet2)
Singaren
GEANT
- Germany
- France
- Italy
- UK
- etc.
Sinet (Japan)
Japan – Russia(BINP)
CA*net4
CERN
MREN
Netherlands
Russia
StarTap
Taiwan
(ASCC)
LIGO
PNNL
ESnet IP
Japan
MIT
JGI
FNAL
ANL-DC
INEEL-DC
ORAU-DC
ANL
LLNL/LANL-DC
SNLL
QWEST
ATM
LLNL
LBNL
NERSC
SLAC
AMES
BNL
NY-NAP
PPPL
MAE-E
4xLAB-DC
GTN&NNSA
MAE-W
PAIX-E
KCP
YUCCA MT
JLAB
ORNL
LANL
SDSC
ALB
HUB
GA
OSTI
ARM
SNLA
ORAU
NOAA
SRS
Allied
Signal
42 end user sites
Office Of Science Sponsored (22)
NNSA Sponsored (12)
Joint Sponsored (3)
Other Sponsored (NSF LIGO, NOAA)
Laboratory Sponsored (6)
peering points
ESnet hubs
ESnet core ring: Packet over
SONET Optical Ring and Hubs
International (high speed)
OC192 (10G/s optical)
OC48 (2.5 Gb/s optical)
Gigabit Ethernet (1 Gb/s)
OC12 ATM (622 Mb/s)
OC12
OC3 (155 Mb/s)
T3 (45 Mb/s)
T1-T3
T1 (1 Mb/s)
11
Current Architecture
ESnet site
site LAN
Site IP
router
ESnet hub
RTR
ESnet IP
router
RTR
10GE
• usually SONET data framing
or Ethernet data framing
• can be clear digital channels
(no framing – e.g. for digital
HDTV)
RTR
10GE
Lambda channels are
converted to electrical
channels
ESnet core
Site – ESnet network
policy demarcation
(“DMZ”)
Wave division
multiplexing
• today typically 64 x 10 Gb/s
optical channels per fiber
• channels (referred to as
“lambdas”) are usually used
in bi-directional pairs
A ring topology network is inherently reliable – all
single point failures are mitigated by routing traffic in
the other direction around the ring.
RTR
RTR
optical
fiber ring
RTR
12
Peering – ESnet’s Logical Infrastructure –
Connects the DOE Community With its Collaborators
Australia
CA*net4
Taiwan
(TANet2)
Singaren
PNW-GPOP
CA*net4
CERN
MREN
Netherlands
Russia
StarTap
Taiwan
(ASCC)
KDDI (Japan)
France
GEANT
- Germany
- France
- Italy
- UK
- etc
SInet (Japan)
KEK
Japan – Russia (BINP)
SEA HUB
2 PEERS
Distributed 6TAP
19 Peers
Abilene
Japan
1 PEER
LBNL
CalREN2
1 PEER
Abilene +
7 Universities
Abilene 2 PEERS
PAIX-W
3 PEERS
FIX-W
MAE-W
39 PEERS
CENIC
SDSC
NYC HUBS
5 PEERS
26 PEERS
MAX GPOP
MAE-E
PAIX-E
22 PEERS
20 PEERS
EQX-SJ
GA
TECHnet
Commercial
ESnet Peering
(connections to
other networks)
6 PEERS
LANL
University
International
Commercial
Abilene
ATL HUB
ESnet provides complete access to the Internet by
managing the full complement of Global Internet
routes (about 150,000) at 10 general/commercial
peering points + high-speed peerings w/ Abilene and
the international networks.
What is Peering?
•
•
Peering points
exchange routing
information that says
“which packets I can
get closer to their
destination”
ESnet daily peering
report
(top 20 of about 100)
• This is a lot of work
peering with this outfit
is not random, it carries
routes that ESnet needs
(e.g. to the Russian
Backbone Net)
AS
routes
peer
1239
63384
SPRINTLINK
701
51685
UUNETALTERNET
209
47063
QWEST
3356
41440
LEVEL3
3561
35980
CABLEWIRELESS
7018
28728
ATT-WORLDNET
2914
19723
VERIO
3549
17369
GLOBALCENTER
5511
8190
OPENTRANSIT
174
5492
COGENTCO
6461
5032
ABOVENET
7473
4429
SINGTEL
3491
3529
CAIS
11537
3327
ABILENE
5400
3321
BT
4323
2774
TWTELECOM
4200
2475
ALERON
6395
2408
BROADWING
2828
2383
XO
7132
1961
SBC
14
What is Peering?
•
Why so many routes?
So that when I want to get to someplace out of the ordinary, I
can get there. For example:
http://www-sbras.nsc.ru/eng/sbras/copan/microel_main.html
(Technological Design Institute of Applied Microelectronics of
SB RAS 630090, Novosibirsk, Russia)
Peering routers
Start: 134.55.209.5
snv-lbl-oc48.es.net
ESnet core
134.55.209.90
snvrt1-ge0-snvcr1.es.net
ESnet peering at Sunnyvale
63.218.6.65
pos3-0.cr01.sjo01.pccwbtn.net
AS3491 CAIS Internet
63.218.6.38
pos5-1.cr01.chc01.pccwbtn.net
“
“
63.216.0.53
pos6-1.cr01.vna01.pccwbtn.net
“
“
63.216.0.30
pos5-3.cr02.nyc02.pccwbtn.net
“
“
63.218.12.37
pos6-0.cr01.ldn01.pccwbtn.net
“
“
63.218.13.134
rbnet.pos4-1.cr01.ldn01.pccwbtn.net
AS3491->AS5568 (Russian
Backbone Network) peering point
195.209.14.29
MSK-M9-RBNet-5.RBNet.ru
Russian Backbone Network
195.209.14.153
MSK-M9-RBNet-1.RBNet.ru
“
“
195.209.14.206
NSK-RBNet-2.RBNet.ru
“
“
Finish: 194.226.160.10
Novosibirsk-NSC-RBNet.nsc.ru
RBN to AS 5387 (NSCNET-2)
15
ESnet is Engineered to Move a Lot of Data
ESnet is currently transporting about 250 terabytes/mo.
ESnet Monthly Accepted Traffic
300
TBytes/Month
250
200
150
100
Annual growth in the past
five years has increased
from 1.7x annually to just
over 2.0x annually.
50
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1992
1991
1990
0
16
Who Generates Traffic, and Where Does it Go?
ESnet Inter-Sector Traffic Summary,
Jan 2003 / Feb 2004 (1.7X overall traffic increase, 1.9X OSC increase)
(the international traffic is increasing due to BABAR at SLAC and the LHC tier 1 centers at
FNAL and BNL)
72/68%
DOE sites
DOE is a net supplier
of data because
DOE facilities are
used by universities
and commercial
entities, as well as by
DOE researchers
21/14%
ESnet
~25/18%
14/12%
17/10%
10/13%
Note that more that 90% of the ESnet traffic is
OSC traffic
ESnet Appropriate Use Policy (AUP)
All ESnet traffic must originate and/or terminate on
an ESnet an site (no transit traffic is allowed)
R&E (mostly
universities)
Peering Points
53/49%
DOE collaborator traffic, inc.
data
Commercial
9/26%
International
4/6%
Traffic coming into ESnet = Green
Traffic leaving ESnet = Blue
Traffic between sites
% = of total ingress or egress traffic
17
1 terabyte/day
ESnet Top 20 Data Flows, 24 hrs., 2004-04-20
A small number
of science users
account for a
significant
fraction of all
ESnet traffic
18
Top 50 Traffic Flows Monitoring – 24hr – 1 Int’l Peering Point
10 flows
> 100 GBy/day
More than 50
flows
> 10 GBy/day
19
Scalable Operation is Essential
•
•
R&E networks typically operate with a small staff
The key to everything that the network provides is
scalability
o
How do you manage a huge infrastructure with a small
number of people?
o
This issue dominates all others when looking at whether to
support new services (e.g. Grid middleware)
- Can the service be structured so that its operational aspects do not
scale as a function of the use population?
- If not, then it cannot be offered as a service
20
Scalable Operation is Essential
The entire ESnet network is
operated by fewer than 15 people
Infrastructure (6 FTE)
Core Engineering Group (5 FTE)
7X24 On-Call Engineers (7 FTE)
7X24 Operations Desk (2-4 FTE)
Science Services
(middleware and
collaboration tools) (5 FTE)
Management, resource management,
circuit accounting, group leads (4 FTE)
•
21
•Automated, real-time monitoring of traffic levels and operating
state of some 4400 network entities is the primary network
operational and diagnosis tool
Performance
Hardware Configuration
Network Configuration
SecureNet
OSPF Metrics (internal
routing and connectivity)
IBGP Mesh (WAN routing
and connectivity)
How Are Problems Detected and Resolved?
Australia
CA*net4
Taiwan
(TANet2)
Singaren
CA*net4
When a hardware
KDDI (Japan)
alarm goes off France
here, the 24x7Switzerland
Taiwan
(TANet2)
operator is notified
CA*net4
CERN
MREN
Netherlands
Russia
StarTap
Taiwan
(ASCC)
GEANT
- Germany
- France
- Italy
- UK
- etc
Sinet (Japan)
Japan – Russia(BINP)
Nevis
Yale
LIGO
PNNL
ESnet IP
Japan
MIT
JGI
LBNL
NERSC
SLAC
FNAL
ANL-DC
INEEL-DC
ORAU-DC
ANL
LLNL/LANL-DC
SNLL
QWEST
ATM
LLNL
AMES
BNL
PPPL
4xLAB-DC
GTN&NNSA
Allied
Signal
YUCCA MT
LANL
SDSC
ALB
HUB
GA
JLAB
ORNL
OSTI
ARM
SNLA
ORAU
NOAA
SRS
Allied
Signal
International (high speed)
OC192 (10G/s optical)
OC48 (2.5 Gb/s optical)
Gigabit Ethernet (1 Gb/s)
OC12 ATM (622 Mb/s)
OC12
OC3 (155 Mb/s)
T3 (45 Mb/s)
T1-T3
T1 (1 Mb/s)
23
ESnet is Monitored in Many Ways
Performance
Hardware Configuration
ESnet configuration
SecureNet
OSPF Metrics
IBGP Mesh
24
Drill Down into the Configuration DB to Operating
Characteristics of Every Device
e.g. cooling air temperature
for the router chassis air
inlet, hot-point, and air
exhaust for the ESnet
gateway router at PNNL
Problem Resolution
•
Let’s say that the diagnoistics have pinpointed a bad
module in a router rack in the ESnet hub in NYC
•
Almost all high-end routers, and other equipment
that ESnet uses, have multiple, redundant modules
for all critical functions
•
Failure of a module (e.g. a power supply or a control
computer) can be corrected on-the-fly, without
turning off the power or impacting the continued
operation of the router
•
Failed modules are typically replaced by a “smart
hands” service at the hubs or sites
o
One of the many essential scalability mechanisms
26
ESnet is Monitored in Many Ways
Performance
Hardware Configuration
ESnet configuration
SecureNet
OSPF Metrics
IBGP Mesh
27
Drill Down into the Hardware Configuration DB
for Every Wire Connection
Equipment rack
detail at AOA,
NYC Hub
(one of the
10 Gb/s core
optical ring sites)
The Hub
Configuration
Database
• Equipment
wiring detail for
two modules at
the AOA, NYC
Hub
• This allows
“smart hands” –
e.g., Qwest
personnel at
the NYC site –
to replace
modules for
ESnet)
What Does this Equipment Actually Look Like?
Picture detail
Equipment
rack detail at
NYC Hub,
32 Avenue of
the Americas
(one of the
10 Gb/s core
optical ring
sites)
30
Typical Equipment of an ESnet Core Network Hub
Sentry power 48v
30/60 amp panel
($3900 list)
Sentry power 48v
10/25 amp panel
($3350 list)
DC / AC Converter
($2200 list)
Lightwave Secure
Terminal Server
($4800 list)
Juniper M20
AOA-PR1
(peering RTR)
($353,000 list)
Qwest DS3 DCX
AOA
Performance Tester
($4800 list)
Cisco 7206
AOA-AR1
(low speed links to
MIT & PPPL)
($38,150 list)
ESnet core
equipment @
Qwest
32 AofA HUB
NYC, NY
(~$1.8M, list)
Juniper OC192
Optical Ring
Interface (the
AOA end of
the OC192 to
CHI
($195,000 list)
Juniper T320
AOA-CR1
(Core router)
($1,133,000
list)
Juniper OC48
Optical Ring
Interface (the
AOA end of
the OC48 to
DC-HUB
($65,000 list)
31
Outline
• How do Networks Work?
• Role of the R&E Core Network
• ESnet as a Core Network
•
o
ESnet Has Experienced Exponential Growth Since 1992
o
ESnet is Monitored in Many Ways
o
How Are Problems Detected and Resolved?
Operating Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
o
Disaster Recovery and Stability
o
Recovery from Physical Attack / Failure
o
Maintaining Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
in the Face of Cyberattack
• Services that Grids need from the Network
o
Public Key Infrastructure example
32
Operating Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
•
ESnet is a visible and critical piece of DOE science
infrastructure
o
•
if ESnet fails,10s of thousands of DOE and University users know it
within minutes if not seconds
Requires high reliability and high operational security in the
systems that are integral to the operation and management
of the network
o
Secure and redundant mail and Web systems are central to the
operation and security of ESnet
- trouble tickets are by email
- engineering communication by email
- engineering database interfaces are via Web
o
Secure network access to Hub routers
o
Backup secure telephone modem access to Hub equipment
o
24x7 help desk and 24x7 on-call network engineer
[email protected] (end-to-end problem resolution)
33
Disaster Recovery and Stability
LBNL
SNV HUB
Remote
Engineer
• partial duplicate
infrastructure
Engineers, 24x7 Network
Operations Center, generator
backed power
• Spectrum (net mgmt system)
• DNS (name – IP address
translation)
• Eng database
• Load database
• Config database
• Public and private Web
• E-mail (server and archive)
• PKI cert. repository and
revocation lists
• collaboratory
authorization
ALB
HUB
service
Remote Engineer
• partial duplicate
infrastructure
DNS
AMES
BNL
CHI HUB
NYC HUBS
PPPL
DC HUB
Remote
Engineer
Duplicate Infrastructure
Currently deploying full
replication of the NOC
databases and servers
and Science Services
databases in the NYC
Qwest carrier hub
• The network must be kept available even if, e.g., the West Coast
is disabled by a massive earthquake, etc.
Reliable operation of the network involves
• remote Network Operation Centers (3)
• replicated support infrastructure
• generator backed UPS power at all critical
network and infrastructure locations
• high physical security for all equipment
• non-interruptible core - ESnet core
operated without interruption through
o
o
o
N. Calif. Power blackout of 2000
the 9/11/2001 attacks, and
the Sept., 2003 NE States power blackout
34
Recovery from Physical Attack / Core Ring Failure
normal traffic flow
Chicago (CHI)
The Hubs have lots
of connections
(42 in all)
Sunnyvale (SNV)
New York (AOA)
X
break in
the ring
reversed traffic flow
Washington, DC (DC)
ESnet
backbone
(optical fiber
ring)
Hubs
(backbone routers
and local loop
connection points)
El Paso (ELP)
Atlanta (ATL)
We can route traffic
either way around the
ring, so any single
failure in the ring is
transparent to ESnet
users
The local loops are still
single points of failure
Local loop
(Hub to local site)
ESnet
border
router
DMZ
Site
gateway
router
Site
LAN
Site
35
Maintaining Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
in the Face of Cyberattack
•
A Phased Security Architecture is being implemented to
protects the network and the ESnet sites
•
The phased response ranges from blocking certain site traffic
to a complete isolation of the network which allows the sites
to continue communicating among themselves in the face of
the most virulent attacks
o
Separates ESnet core routing functionality from external Internet
connections by means of a “peering” router that can have a policy
different from the core routers
o
Provide a rate limited path to the external Internet that will insure siteto-site communication during an external denial of service attack
o
Provide “lifeline” connectivity for downloading of patches, exchange of
e-mail and viewing web pages (i.e.; e-mail, dns, http, https, ssh, etc.)
with the external Internet prior to full isolation of the network
Cyberattack Defense
ESnet first response –
filters to assist a site
ESnet second
response – filter traffic
from outside of ESnet
ESnet third response – shut down the
main peering paths and provide only
limited bandwidth paths for specific
“lifeline” services
X
X
router
ESnet
peering
router
router
LBNL
X
Lab first
response – filter
incoming traffic
at their ESnet
gateway router
gateway
router
border
router
attack
traffic
router
peering
router
border router
Lab
Sapphire/Slammer worm infection created a Gb/s of
traffic on the ESnet core until filters were put in place (both
into and out of sites) to damp it out.
Lab
gateway
router
37
•
ESnet WAN Security and Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity is a new dimension of ESnet security
o
o
Security is now inherently a global problem
As the entity with a global view of the network, ESnet has an
important role in overall security
30 minutes after the Sapphire/Slammer worm was released, 75,000
hosts running Microsoft's SQL Server (port 1434) were infected.
(“The Spread of the Sapphire/Slammer Worm,” David Moore (CAIDA & UCSD CSE), Vern Paxson (ICIR &
LBNL), Stefan Savage (UCSD CSE), Colleen Shannon (CAIDA), Stuart Staniford (Silicon Defense), Nicholas
Weaver (Silicon Defense & UC Berkeley EECS) http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~nweaver/sapphire ) Jan., 2003
38
ESnet and Cybersecurity
Sapphire/Slammer worm infection hits creating
almost a full Gb/s (1000 megabit/sec.) traffic
spike on the ESnet backbone
39
Outline
• Role of the R&E Transit Network
• ESnet is Driven by the Requirements of DOE Science
• Terminology – How Do Networks Work?
• How Does it Work? – ESnet as a Backbone Network
o
o
o
•
ESnet Has Experienced Exponential Growth Since 1992
ESnet is Monitored in Many Ways
How Are Problems Detected and Resolved?
Operating Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
o
Disaster Recovery and Stability
o
Recovery from Physical Attack / Failure
Maintaining Science Mission Critical Infrastructure
in the Face of Cyberattack
o
• Services that Grids need from the Network
o
Public Key Infrastructure example
40
Network and Middleware Needs of DOE Science
August 13-15, 2002
Organized by Office
of Science
Mary Anne Scott, Chair
Dave Bader
Steve Eckstrand
Marvin Frazier
Dale Koelling
Vicky White
Workshop Panel Chairs
• Focused on science requirements that drive
o
o
o
o
Advanced Network Infrastructure
Middleware Research
Network Research
Network Governance Model
Ray Bair and Deb Agarwal
Bill Johnston and Mike Wilde
Rick Stevens
Ian Foster and Dennis Gannon
Linda Winkler and Brian Tierney
Sandy Merola and Charlie Catlett
• The requirements for DOE science were developed by the OSC science
community representing major DOE science disciplines
o Climate
o Magnetic Fusion Energy Sciences
o Spallation Neutron Source
o Chemical Sciences
o Macromolecular Crystallography
o Bioinformatics
o High Energy Physics
Available at www.es.net/#research
41
Grid Middleware Requirements (DOE Workshop)
•
A DOE workshop examined science driven requirements for
network and middleware and identified twelve high priority
middleware services (see www.es.net/#research)
•
Some of these services have a central management
component and some do not
•
Most of the services that have central management fit the
criteria for ESnet support. These include, for example
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Production, federated RADIUS authentication service
PKI federation services
Virtual Organization Management services to manage organization
membership, member attributes and privileges
Long-term PKI key and proxy credential management
End-to-end monitoring for Grid / distributed application debugging and
tuning
Some form of authorization service (e.g. based on RADIUS)
Knowledge management services that have the characteristics of an
ESnet service are also likely to be important (future)
42
Grid Middleware Services
•
ESnet provides several “science services” – services
that support the practice of science
•
A number of such services have an organization like
ESnet as the natural provider
o
ESnet is trusted, persistent, and has a large (almost
comprehensive within DOE) user base
o
ESnet has the facilities to provide reliable access and high
availability through assured network access to replicated
services at geographically diverse locations
o
However, service must be scalable in the sense that as its
user base grows, ESnet interaction with the users does
not grow (otherwise not practical for a small organization
like ESnet to operate)
43
Science Services: PKI Support for Grids
•
Public Key Infrastructure supports cross-site, crossorganization, and international trust relationships that permit
sharing computing and data resources and other Grid
services
•
DOEGrids Certification Authority service provides X.509
identity certificates to support Grid authentication provides an
example of this model
o
The service requires a highly trusted provider, and requires a
high degree of availability
o
The service provider is a centralized agent for negotiating trust
relationships, e.g. with European CAs
o
The service scales by adding site based or Virtual Organization
based Registration Agents that interact directly with the users
o
See DOEGrids CA (www.doegrids.org)
44
Science Services: Public Key Infrastructure
•
DOEGrids CA policies are tailored to science Grids
o
Digital identity certificates for people, hosts and services
o
Provides formal and verified trust management – an essential
service for widely distributed heterogeneous collaboration, e.g.
in the International High Energy Physics community
 This service was the basis of the first routine sharing of HEP
computing resources between US and Europe
 Have recently added a second CA with a policy that supports
secondary issuers that need to do bulk issuing of certificates
with central private key management
o
NERSC will auto issue certs when accounts are set up – this
constitutes an acceptable identity verification
o
A variant of this will also be set up to support security domain
gateways such as Kerberos – X509 – e.g. KX509 – at FNAL
45
Science Services: Public Key Infrastructure
•
The rapidly expanding customer base of this service will soon
make it ESnet’s largest collaboration service by customer
count
Registration Authorities
ANL
LBNL
ORNL
DOESG (DOE Science Grid)
ESG (Climate)
FNAL
PPDG (HEP)
Fusion Grid
iVDGL (NSF-DOE HEP collab.)
NERSC
PNNL
46
Grid Network Services Requirements (GGF, GHPN)
•
Grid High Performance Networking Research Group,
“Networking Issues of Grid Infrastructures” (draft-ggf-ghpnnetissues-3) – what networks should provide to Grids
o
High performance transport for bulk data transfer (over 1Gb/s
per flow)
o
Performance controllability to provide ad hoc quality of service
and traffic isolation.
o
Dynamic Network resource allocation and reservation
o
High availability when expensive computing or visualization
resources have been reserved
o
Security controllability to provide a trusty and efficient
communication environment when required
o
Multicast to efficiently distribute data to group of resources.
o
How to integrate wireless network and sensor networks in Grid
environment
47
Transport Services
•
network tools available to build services
o
queue management
- provide forwarding priorities different from best effort
- e.g.
– scavenger (discard if anything behind in the queue)
– expedited forwarding (elevated priority queuing)
– low latency forwarding (highest priority – ahead of all
other traffic)
o
path management
- tagged traffic can be managed separately from regular traffic
o
policing
- limit the bandwidth of an incoming stream
48
Priority Service: Guaranteed Bandwidth
bandwidth
1000
0
available for elevated priority traffic
reserved for production, best effort traffic
network pipe
bandwidth management model
?
bandwidth
broker
user
system1
flag traffic from
user system1 for
expedited forwarding
site A
border
router
border
router
user
system2
site B
49
Priority Service: Guaranteed Bandwidth
• What is wrong with this? (almost everything)
there may be
several users that
want all of the
premium bandwidth
at the same time
the user may send
data into the high
priority stream at a
high enough bandwidth
that it interferes with
production traffic (and
not even know it)
?
this is at least three
independent
networks, and
probably more
a user that was a
priority at site A may
not be at site B
bandwidth
broker
user
system1
border
router
site A
border
router
site B
user
system2
50
Priority Service: Guaranteed Bandwidth
policer
authorization
user
system1
shaper
• To address all of the issues is complex
resource
manager
bandwidth
broker
allocation
manager
site A
resource
manager
resource
manager
user
system2
site B
51
Priority Service
•
•
So, practically, what can be done?
With available tools can provide a small number of
provisioned circuits
o
secure and end-to-end (system to system)
o
various Quality of Service possible, including minimum
latency
o
a certain amount of route reliability (if redundant paths
exist in the network)
o
end systems can manage these circuits as single high
bandwidth paths or multiple lower bandwidth paths of (with
application level shapers)
o
non-interfering with production traffic, so aggressive
protocols may be used
52
policer
user
system1
authorization
Priority Service: Guaranteed Bandwidth
bandwidth
broker
resource
manager
allocation will
probably be
relatively static
and ad hoc
site A
resource
manager
• will probably be service level
agreements among transit
networks allowing for a fixed
amount of priority traffic – so the
resource manager does minimal
checking and no authorization
• will do policing, but only at the full
bandwidth of the service
agreement (for self protection)
resource
manager
user
system2
site B
53
Grid Network Services Requirements (GGF, GHPN)
•
Grid High Performance Networking Research Group,
“Networking Issues of Grid Infrastructures” (draft-ggf-ghpnnetissues-3) – what networks should provide to Grids
o
High performance transport for bulk data transfer (over 1Gb/s
per flow)
o
Performance controllability to provide ad hoc quality of service
and traffic isolation.
o
Dynamic Network resource allocation and reservation
o
High availability when expensive computing or visualization
resources have been reserved
o
Security controllability to provide a trusted and efficient
communication environment when required
o
Multicast to efficiently distribute data to group of resources.
o
Integrated wireless network and sensor networks in Grid
environment
54
High Throughput
Requireme
nts
1) High average throughput
2) Advanced protocol capabilities available and usable at the end-systems
3) Lack of use of QoS parameters
Current
issues
1) Low average throughput
2) Semantic gap between socket buffer interface and the protocol capabilities of
TCP
Analyzed
reasons
1a) End system bottleneck,
1b) Protocol misconfigured,
1c) Inefficient Protocol
1d) Mixing of congestion control and error recovery
2a) TCP connection Set up: Blocking operations vs asynchronous
2b)Window scale option not accessible through the API
Available
solutions
1a) Multiple TCP sessions
1b) Larger MTU
1c) ECN
Proposed
alternatives
1) Alternatives to TCP (see DT-RG survey document)
2) OS by-pass and protocol off-loading
3) Overlays
4) End to end optical paths
55
A New Architecture
•
The essential requirements cannot be met with
the current, telecom provided, hub and spoke
architecture of ESnet
DOE sites
New York (AOA)
ESnet
Core/Backbone
Washington, DC (DC)
Sunnyvale (SNV)
El Paso (ELP)
•
Atlanta (ATL)
The core ring has good capacity and resiliency
against single point failures, but the point-topoint tail circuits are neither reliable nor scalable
to the required bandwidth
56
A New Architecture
•
A second backbone ring will multiply connect the
MAN rings to protect against hub failure
AsiaPacific
Europe
DOE sites
Sunnyvale (SNV)
New York (AOA)
ESnet
Core/Backbone
Washington, DC (DC)
Atlanta (ATL)
El Paso (ELP)
•
All OSC Labs will be able to participate in some
variation of this new architecture in order to gain
highly reliable and high capacity network access
57
Conclusions
•
ESnet is an infrastructure that is critical to DOE’s
science mission and that serves all of DOE
•
•
Focused on the Office of Science Labs
•
QoS is hard – but we have enough experience to do
pilot studies (which ESnet is just about to start)
•
Middleware services for large numbers of users are
hard – but they can be provided if careful attention is
paid to scaling
ESnet is working on providing the DOE mission
science networking requirements with several new
initiatives and a new architecture
58