Transcript ZigBee and Bluetooth

ZigBee and 802.15.4
for
Personal Area and Sensor Networks
CS 117, Winter 2004
March 2nd, 2004
Outline
• ZigBee and 802.15.4 solution
• ZigBee vs Bluetooth
• Applications
• Conclusions
The ZigBee Alliance Solution
• Targeted at home and building automation and
controls, consumer electronics, PC peripherals,
medical monitoring, and toys
• Industry standard through application profiles
running over IEEE 802.15.4 radios
• Primary drivers are simplicity, long battery life,
networking capabilities, reliability, and cost
• Alliance provides interoperability and
certification testing
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
The Wireless Market
GRAPHICS INTERNET
HI-FI
AUDIO
STREAMING
VIDEO
DIGITAL
VIDEO
MULTI-CHANNEL
VIDEO
>
LONG
TEXT
SHORT
< RANGE
802.11b
LAN
802.11a/HL2 & 802.11g
Bluetooth 2
ZigBee
PAN
Bluetooth1
LOW
< DATA RATE
>
HIGH
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Applications
security
HVAC
AMR
lighting control
access control
BUILDING
AUTOMATION
patient
monitoring
fitness
monitoring
CONSUMER
ELECTRONICS
TV
VCR
DVD/CD
remote
ZigBee
PERSONAL
HEALTH CARE
asset mgt
process control
environmental
energy mgt
Wireless Control that
Simply Works
INDUSTRIAL
CONTROL
RESIDENTIAL/
LIGHT
COMMERCIAL
CONTROL
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
PC &
PERIPHERALS
mouse
keyboard
joystick
security
HVAC
lighting control
access control
lawn & garden irrigation
Promoter Companies
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Development of the Standard
APPLICATION
ZIGBEE STACK
SILICON
• ZigBee Alliance
– 50+ companies: semiconductor
mfrs, IP providers, OEMs, etc.
Customer – Defining upper layers of
protocol stack: from network to
application, including
ZigBee
application profiles
Alliance
IEEE
– First profiles published mid
802.15.4
2003
• IEEE 802.15.4 Working Group
– Defining lower layers of protocol
stack: MAC and PHY scheduled
for release in April
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
IEEE 802.15.4 Basics
• 802.15.4 is a simple packet data protocol for lightweight
wireless networks
– Channel Access is via Carrier Sense Multiple Access with collision
avoidance and optional time slotting
– Message acknowledgement and an optional beacon structure
– Multi-level security
– Three bands, 27 channels specified
• 2.4 GHz: 16 channels, 250 kbps
• 868.3 MHz : 1 channel, 20 kbps
• 902-928 MHz: 10 channels, 40 kbps
– Works well for
• Long battery life, selectable latency for controllers, sensors, remote
monitoring and portable electronics
– Configured for maximum battery life, has the potential to last as
long as the shelf life of most batteries
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Introduction to the IEEE
802.15.4 Standard
• IEEE 802.15.4 standard released May
2003
– Semiconductor manufacturers
• Sampling Transceiver ICs and platform
hardware/software to Alpha Customers now
– Users of the technology
• Defining application profiles for the first products,
an effort organized by the ZigBee Alliance
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
IEEE 802.15.4 standard
• Includes layers up to and including Link Layer Control
– LLC is standardized in 802.1
• Supports multiple network topologies including Star,
Cluster Tree and Mesh
• Features of the MAC:
Association/dissociation, ACK,
frame delivery, channel access
mechanism, frame validation,
guaranteed time slot management,
beacon management, channel scan
• Low complexity: 26 primitives
versus 131 primitives for
802.15.1 (Bluetooth)
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee Application Framework
Networking App Layer (NWK)
Data Link Controller (DLC)
IEEE 802.15.4 LLC
IEEE 802.2
LLC, Type I
IEEE 802.15.4 MAC
IEEE 802.15.4
868/915 MHz PHY
IEEE 802.15.4
2400 MHz PHY
IEEE 802.15.4 MAC Overview
•
Employs 64-bit IEEE & 16-bit short addresses
– Ultimate network size can reach 264 nodes (more than we’ll probably
need…)
– Using local addressing, simple networks of more than 65,000 (2^16) nodes
can be configured, with reduced address overhead
•
Three devices specified
– Network Coordinator
– Full Function Device (FFD)
– Reduced Function Device (RFD)
•
•
•
•
•
•
Simple frame structure
Reliable delivery of data
Association/disassociation
AES-128 security
CSMA-CA channel access
Optional superframe structure with beacons
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
IEEE 802.15.4 Device Types
• Three device types
– Network Coordinator
• Maintains overall network knowledge; most sophisticated of the three
types; most memory and computing power
– Full Function Device
• Carries full 802.15.4 functionality and all features specified by the
standard
• Additional memory, computing power make it ideal for a network router
function
• Could also be used in network edge devices (where the network
touches the real world)
– Reduced Function Device
• Carriers limited (as specified by the standard) functionality to control
cost and complexity
• General usage will be in network edge devices
• All of these devices can be no more complicated than the
transceiver, a simple 8-bit MCU and a pair of AAA batteries!
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Data Frame format
•
•
•
•
•
One of two most basic and important structures in 15.4
Provides up to 104 byte data payload capacity
Data sequence numbering to ensure that all packets are tracked
Robust frame structure improves reception in difficult conditions
Frame Check Sequence (FCS) ensures that packets received are
without error
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Acknowledgement Frame
Format
• The other most important structure for 15.4
• Provides active feedback from receiver to sender that
packet was received without error
• Short packet that takes advantage of standardsspecified “quiet time” immediately after data packet
transmission
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Beacon Frame format
•
•
•
Beacons add a new level of functionality to a network
Client devices can wake up only when a beacon is to be broadcast,
listen for their address, and if not heard, return to sleep
Beacons are important for mesh and cluster tree networks to keep all
of the nodes synchronized without requiring nodes to consume
precious battery energy listening for long periods of time
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
MAC Options
• Two channel access mechanisms
– Non-beacon network
• Standard ALOHA CSMA-CA communications
• Positive acknowledgement for successfully received packets
– Beacon-enabled network
• Superframe structure
– For dedicated bandwidth and low latency
– Set up by network coordinator to transmit beacons at
predetermined intervals
» 15ms to 252sec (15.38ms*2n where 0  n  14)
» 16 equal-width time slots between beacons
» Channel access in each time slot is contention free
– Three security levels specified
• None
• Access control lists
• Symmetric key employing AES-128
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ISM Band Interference and
Coexistence
• Potential for interference exists in every ISM band, not
just 2.4GHz
• IEEE 802.11 and 802.15.2 committees are addressing
coexistence issues
• ZigBee/802.15.4 Protocol is very robust
– Clear channel checking before transmission
– Backoff and retry if no acknowledgement received
– Duty cycle of a ZigBee-compliant device is usually
extremely low
– It’s the “cockroach that survives the nuclear war”
• Waits for an opening in otherwise busy RF spectrum
• Waits for acknowledgements to verify packet reception at
other end
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee Topology Models
Mesh
Star
ZigBee coordinator
ZigBee Routers
ZigBee End Devices
Cluster Tree
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Non-Beacon vs Beacon
Modes
• Non-Beacon Mode
– A simple, traditional multiple access system used in simple peer
and near-peer networks
– Think of it like a two-way radio network, where each client is
autonomous and can initiate a conversation at will, but could
interfere with others unintentionally
– However, the recipient may not hear the call or the channel might
already be in use
• Beacon Mode
– A very powerful mechanism for controlling power consumption in
extended networks like cluster tree or mesh
– Allows all clients in a local piece of the network the ability to know
when to communicate with each other
– Here, the two-way radio network has a central dispatcher who
manages the channel and arranges the calls
• As you’ll see, the primary value will be in system power
consumption
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Example of Non-Beacon
Network
• Commercial or home security
– Client units (intrusion sensors, motion detectors, glass break
detectors, standing water sensors, loud sound detectors, etc)
• Sleep 99.999% of the time
• Wake up on a regular yet random basis to announce their continued
presence in the network (“12 o’clock and all’s well”)
• When an event occurs, the sensor wakes up instantly and transmits the
alert (“Somebody’s on the front porch”)
– The ZigBee Coordinator, mains powered, has its receiver on all the
time and so can wait to hear from each of these stations
• Since ZigBee Coordinator has “infinite” source of power it can allow
clients to sleep for unlimited periods of time to allow them to save
power
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Example of Beacon Network
• Now make the ZigBee Coordinator battery-operated also
– All units in system are now battery-operated
– Client registration to the network
• Client unit when first powered up listens for the ZigBee Coordinator’s
network beacon (interval between 0.015 and 252 seconds)
• Register with the coordinator and look for any messages directed to it
• Return to sleep, awaking on a schedule specified by the ZigBee
Coordinator
• Once client communications are completed, ZigBee coordinator also
returns to sleep
– This timing requirement potentially impacts the cost of the timing
circuit in each end device
– Longer intervals of sleep mean that the timer must be more accurate or
– Turn on earlier to make sure that the beacon is heard, increasing receiver
power consumption, or
– Improve the quality of the timing oscillator circuit (increase cost) or
– Control the maximum period of time between beacons to not exceed 252
seconds, keeping oscillator circuit costs low
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee and Bluetooth
Competitive or
Complementary?
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee and Bluetooth
Optimized for different applications
• Bluetooth
• ZigBee
– Larger packets over small
– Smaller packets over
network
large network
– Ad-hoc networks
– Mostly Static
networks with many,
– File transfer
infrequently used
– Screen graphics, pictures,
devices
hands-free audio, Mobile
– Home automation,
phones, headsets, PDAs,
toys, remote controls,
etc.
etc.
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee and Bluetooth
Address Different Needs
• Bluetooth is a
cable replacement
for items like
Phones, Laptop
Computers,
Headsets
• Bluetooth expects
regular charging
– Target is to use
<10% of host
power
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee and Bluetooth
Address Different Needs
• ZigBee is better for
devices where the
battery is ‘rarely’
replaced
– Targets are :
• Tiny fraction of host power
• New opportunities where
wireless not yet used
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee and Bluetooth
ZigBee
Air interface
Bluetooth
• FHSS
• DSSS- 11 chips/
symbol
• 1 M Symbol / second
• 62.5 K symbols/s
• Peak Information Rate
• 4 Bits/ symbol
~720 Kbit / second
• Peak Information Rate
~128 Kbit/second
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee and Bluetooth
Voice
Application Interface
Network Layer
Service
Discovery
Protocol
(Serial Port)
L2CAP
Host Control Interface
Link Manager
MAC Layer
MAC Layer
Link Controller
Baseband
RF
PHY Layer
ZigBee
Stack
Fax
Telephony OBEX
Control
RFCOMM
Protocol
Data Link Layer
Silicon
Dial-up
Networking
Application
vMessage
Intercom
Headset
Cordless
Group Call
vCard
vCal
vNote
User Interface
Application
Silicon
Zigbee
Bluetooth
Stack
Applications
Bluetooth
Protocol Stack Comparison
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee and Bluetooth
Timing Considerations
ZigBee:
• Network join time = 30ms typically
• Sleeping slave changing to active = 15ms typically
• Active slave channel access time = 15ms typically
Bluetooth:
• Network join time = >3s
• Sleeping slave changing to active = 3s typically
• Active slave channel access time = 2ms typically
ZigBee protocol is optimized for
timing critical applications
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee and Bluetooth
AIR INTERFACE
PROTOCOL STACK
BATTERY
DEVICES/NETWORK
LINK RATE
RANGE
Bluetooth
ZigBee
FHSS
DSSS
250 kb
28 kb
rechargeable non-rechargeable
8
255
1 Mbps
250 kbps
~10 meters (w/o pa) ~30 meters
Comparison Overview
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
An Application Example
Battery Life & Latency in a Light Switch
• Wireless Light switch –
– Easy for Builders to Install
• A Bluetooth Implementation
would either :
– keep a counter running so
that it could predict which
hop frequency the light
would have reached or
– use the inquiry procedure to
find the light each time the
switch was operated.
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Light switch using Bluetooth
• Option 1: use counter to predict hop
frequency reached by light
– The two devices must stay within 60 us (~1/10 of
a hop)
– With 30ppm crystals, devices need to
communicate once a second to track each other's
clocks.
– Assume this could be improved by a factor of 100
then devices would need to communicate once
every 100 seconds to maintain synchronization.
– => 900 communications / day with no information
transfer + perhaps 4 communications on demand
– 99.5% Battery Power wasted
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Light switch using Bluetooth
• Option 2: Inquiry procedure to locate
light each time switch is operated
– Bluetooth 1.1 = up to 10 seconds typical
– Bluetooth 1.2 = several seconds even if
optimized
– Unacceptable latency
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Light switch using ZigBee
• With DSSS interface, only need to
perform CSMA before transmitting
– Only 200 µs of latency
– Highly efficient use of battery power
ZigBee offers longer battery
life and lower latency than a
Bluetooth equivalent.
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
ZigBee and Bluetooth
Conclusion
• ZigBee targets applications not
addressable by Bluetooth or any other
wireless standard
• ZigBee and Bluetooth complement for a
broader solution
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Reliability and Robustness
throughout the stacks of IEEE
802.15.4 and ZigBee
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Reliability
Network:
• Mesh Networking: allows various
paths of routing data to the
destination device. In this way if a
device in the primary route is not
able to pass the data, a different
valid route is formed, transparent
to the user.
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Reliability: Mesh Networking
ZigBee Coordinator (FFD)
ZigBee Router (FFD)
ZigBee End Device (RFD or FFD)
Mesh Link
Star Link
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.
Applications
• Industrial Control/Monitoring Space
– Asset Management
• Basic identification
– Device ID, Device PN/SN, Device source/destination, etc.
• Asset “health”
– Temperature, humidity, shock, fuel levels, etc.
– Nearly any parameter can be monitored given an appropriate sensor
– Asset Tracking
• Location tracking through two-way communication
– Simplest form is communication/identification when passes a checkpoint
» Same as other RFID tagging systems
– More sophisticated “what other devices can it hear/communicate with?”
– Other options include ranging (time of flight) and SNR measurement
» Has the potential for very precise location measurement
– The wireless network uses protocol gateways to move
command/monitor data between the end devices and the network
data management center
Copyright 2002 The ZigBee Alliance, Inc.