Transcript 슬라이드 1 - TETRA + Critical Communications Association

A review of
TETRA in South Korea
Young-wan Lee / Airtech I & C
Jun. 22. 2005.
nd
2 TETRA South Korea Conference
Amiga Hotel , Seoul
A review of TETRA in South Korea
1
Historical REVIEW TRS in Korea - 1
•
•
1988 : Service started GE Mark V TRS system for Seoul Olympic
1991 : the First commercial TRS service was launched
– Korea Harbour Telephony Co. - currently KT Powertel
– ISSUE : Coast Vessel Telephony Service – limited business model and not
suitable using LTR
•
1992 : MIC officially allocate frequency and release License guideline
– Commercial and Private Land service TRS freq. Band
– ISSUE : Promoting Local Manufacture but limited 380MHz band Radio Supplier
806MHz
811
Private
(5 MHz)
821
Commercial
(10 MHz)
851
Cellular
(25 MHz)
856
Private
(5 MHz)
TRS TX Band
371.5MHz
Private
(5 MHz)
376.5
Commercial
(10 MHz)
Cellular
(25 MHz)
TRS RX Band
381.5
Commer.
(5 MHz)
TRS TX Band
866
389.5
394.5
Private
(5 MHz)
399.5
Commer.
(5 MHz)
TRS RX Band
* Differ from TETRA Band
A review of TETRA in South Korea
2
Historical REVIEW TRS in Korea -2
•
1993 : Start Standardization of Analog TRS (TTA) – Failed
– ISSUE : multiple standard.. LTR, SmartNet, EDACS, Starex TRS
•
1994 : the First Public Safety TRS service was launched using 800MHz
EDACS (SMPA)
•
1994 : Service start the first commercial land mobile TRS by KHTC (LTRAmericom)
•
1995 ~ : Start to Build Private TRS Systems
– POSCO (SmartNet), KEPCO (EDACS), TBS (MPT1327), ….AirForce (MPT1327),
KTX (ASTRO)…
•
1996 : License granted for Nation wide and Regional Commercial Digital
TRS Services
– ISSUE : Freq. Efficiency (TDMA vs FDMA vs FHMA)
– Discontinued FHMA technology : Single Vendor Problem
•
2001 : Start to Build 800MHz band TETRA network for 4 Metropolitan Cities
– ISSUE : 800MHz vs 380MHz
A review of TETRA in South Korea
3
NEMA Project
• Sep. 2001 : MIC Report to Unify Public Agency Radio freq. using
TETRA for the purpose of Improving Disaster Management and Freq.
Efficiency (A Study to Improve the Dispatch Radio Network using Government Agencies : Sep.
2001,KORA 2000-3)
– ISSUE : Dispatch communication Problem at Large Disaster Field (Crumble of
Sampoong Dep’t , Flood of Paju, Explosion of Daegu Subway etc…
• Sep. 2002 : BAI (Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea) became an issue on
existing separated dispatch radio network occupied by various public
agencies
• Oct. 2003 : MIC Select TETRA for Nation-wide Unified Dispatch
Radio Network
– ISSUE : IDEN vs TETRA – Effective Budget vs Public Safety Requirements
• Dec. 2003 : Fixed Master Plan of Unified Dispatch Radio Network
(UDRN) using TETRA - Office for Government Policy Coordination
A review of TETRA in South Korea
4
NEMA Project
(continue)
• Feb. 2004 : MIC Re-allocate TRS Radio frequency Band
– ISSUE 1 : Match 380MHz Band to the ETSI TETRA
– ISSUE 2 : Secure the GDRN Frequency at 800MHz
– ISSUE 3 : 800MHz – Commercial, 380MHz - Private
806MHz
810 811
Private
(4MHz)
Reserved
(1MHz)
822 824
Commercial
(11 MHz)
849 851
Cellular
(25 MHz)
Guard Band
(2MHz)
Guard Band
(2MHz)
855 856
Private
(4MHz)
To be defined
894
Cellular
(25 MHz)
Guard Band
(2MHz)
TRS RX Band
380
Reserved
(11.5 MHz)
Commercial
(11 MHz)
Reserved
(1MHz)
TRS TX Band
368.5MHz
867 869
385
Private A
(5MHz)
TRS TX Band
389.9 390
Private B
(4.9MHz)
Guard Band
(0.1MHz)
395
Private A
(5MHz)
399.9
Private B
(4.9MHz)
TRS RX Band
A review of TETRA in South Korea
5
NEMA Project
•
(continue)
Jun. 2004 : Officially start NEMA organization and tasks
– Performing the UDRN Project
– ISSUE :
• Use existing KNP Network – expanding Nation Wide
• More then 1,400 Gov. Org. and Public Authority
• 200,000 or more Radio subscribers will use same network
• Limited Due date – all system have to established end of 2007
• No Existing System - Complex Org., Huge Network etc….
• No Body want to depend on Single Vender Solution
• Everybody want to “enjoy” Full Featured TETRA function – automatic
roaming, handover, data access, encryption, Telephone Call…
•
Aug. 2004 : TTA (PG105) start TETRA Standardization – finished Mar. 2005
– Choose ETSI TETRA Standard (Original English ver.)
– To be National Standard ???
A review of TETRA in South Korea
6
Market Situation
• NEMA Project
– 800 Base Radio sites, 10 Exchangers, Repeaters
– Over 200,000 Radio Terminals
– Over 1,400 agencies join with NEMA umbrella
– Nation wide Coverage
– Short Term Business until the end of 2007
– $350,000,000 estimated budget
A review of TETRA in South Korea
7
Market Situation
(a Scenario and fact)
• Nation wide and Provincial TRS service provider
– Failed FHMA service move to TETRA
• T-On Telecom (+ other FHMA service provider)
– Continues Frequency Spectrum
• Possibility of Co-work or Backup network with UDRN
• Radio Terminal Compatibility
• Same Size Backbone Market and 100,000 to 400,000 subscribers
• Effect of TTA Standard- A Template for private TRS system customers
– Heavy Industries
– Transportations (Taxi, Delivery Service…)
– Large scale Factories or Industrial Park
– Long Term Constructions
– Some Associations (Sports Complex, Horse affairs…)
A review of TETRA in South Korea
8
Why TETRA…
•
OPEN STANDARD
•
Well proven technology from multi Venders and various Sites
•
Never stop to Improve (Market and Technology)
– Phase 1.. Phase 2…. and MESA
– Circuit Switching … IP Network … VoIP… IPv6…
•
Not depend on Vender’s intention or situation (FHMA, EDACS…)
– Lots of private company has an interest
– Backbone Network ???
•
Customer can Select the Products which they prefer
•
Open Competition – reduce cost, good service, UptoDated Technology …
•
Meet to Public Safety Dispatch Radio requirements
– Call Access time, Authentication and Security, DMO….
A review of TETRA in South Korea
9
What’s problem …
•
No Common Signalling between different vender System
•
3CP ISI is not a solution of UDRN ISI
– Need Complete and full featured Inter System Operation
– Auto Roaming, E2E encryption, Regrouping, Wide Area Group Call, Min. time
delay between System …
•
No Large scale System is operated like the NEMA project
•
Need BPR and setup new SOP : Co-work between Agency in a Disaster
situation
–
•
Physical system is a means of communication
Each User group who will join UDRN has
– different eye level
– wants different requirement (coverage, Radio terminal features, Budget….)
•
Limited Expert and Experience
•
Many Eyes and Complaint Maker
A review of TETRA in South Korea
10
Key of Success
• KEY approaching Mind
– NEMA UDRN will be a good Bench Mark field of TETRA for world wide
market
– NEMA UDRN can not be a TEST field
– No more to hide PROBLEM
– Governmental Project – not Private or Agency level
– NEMA project is a Touchstone of Private company Business Territory
– Need same Knowledge, Terminology and same Eye level
• “POSSIBLE” is not equal to “Actually and Reasonably operate”
– Need Transparency and based on existing Fact
– Need good Understanding about Terminology, Budget Analysis,
Compromising
A review of TETRA in South Korea
11
Suggestion
• Cooperation is the KEY of Mutual Success
– Cooperate for ISI
– Localization
– Share some Knowledge and Experience
A review of TETRA in South Korea
12
Thank You !!
Young-wan Lee / Managing Director CTO
I & C Ltd.
+82-32-815-1119 / +82-11-274-4660
[email protected]
www.airtech21.com
A review of TETRA in South Korea
13