Transcript NAS vs. SAN

NAS vs. SAN
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
1
 Introduction
Network Attached Storage (NAS) and Storage
Area Networks (SAN) are storage architectures
that have gained momentum in the last three to
five years that aim to provide businesses with
cheaper, more scalable, and manageable
alternatives for their ever-growing data
requirements.
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
2

Server-attached storage (traditional way)
on network servers running general-purpose
operating systems, such as Unix ,Windows provide
access to file systems that can be shared among
users while also delivering a variety of other
functions, such as distributed printing, directory
services, mail delivery, Web hosting, database
transaction, and many other network services. The
classic network server uses some form of SCSI host
adapter or RAID controller that in turn connects to
groups of disk drives.
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
3


The primary advantages of server-attached storage
involve simplicity of implementation and modest
cost.
The disadvantage of this model is scalability. As
storage capacity requirements increase to the
multiterabyte level, and as data sets need to be
distributed among multiple applications or servers,
economy and simplicity both fall away.
The shortcomings of the basic server-attached
storage model led to the rise of the NAS and SAN
alternatives.
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
Nahreen Ameen
By
4
 Comparison
NAS model can be considered a mature
technology, with commodity products available
for small workgroups to enterprise wide data
centers.
 SAN represent a still-evolving technology that
targets organizations with large-scale and
complex data storage requirements.

10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
5
 NAS
Almost any machine that can connect to the LAN (or
is interconnected to the LAN through a WAN) can use
NFS, CIFS or HTTP protocol to connect to a NAS and
share files.
 SAN
Only server class devices with SCSI Fiber Channel
can connect to the SAN. The Fiber Channel of the
SAN has a limit of around 10km at best
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
6
Typical NAS
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
7
Typical Fiber Channel SAN
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
8


A NAS identifies data by file name and byte offsets,
transfers file data or file meta-data (file's owner,
permissions, creation data, etc.), and handles
security, user authentication, file locking.
A SAN addresses data by disk block number and
transfers raw disk blocks.
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
9




10/2010
In NAS Backups and mirrors (utilizing features like
NetApp's Snapshots) are done on files, not blocks,
for a savings in bandwidth and time. A Snapshot
can be tiny compared to its source volume.
In SAN Backups and mirrors require a block by
block copy, even if blocks are empty. A mirror
machine must be equal to or greater in capacity
compared to the source volume.
In NAS, File System managed by NAS head unit.
In SAN, File System managed by servers.
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
10




NAS unit can become a serious bottleneck in high
transaction environments.
since a SAN doesn't have to use IP to transfer data
to the servers, the conversion of data blocks into IP
packets (which is done in NAS) doesn't have to take
place, and this reduces latency.
NAS communicates via NFS(for unix) and CIFS(for
win) protocol to transfer data.
SAN communicates via FCP protocol to transfer
data.
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
11


NAS provide a degree of data protection by producing
internal backups. These backup images use hashing or
compression technologies to minimize the amount of
space. In a volatile data environment, data snapshots
can be taken every hour. This type of process does offer
the ability to easily recover files lost through accidental
deletion or software malfunction but not system failure.
SAN involves reliability and fault tolerance. It includes
many redundant components. Its internal disk systems
will rely on RAID configurations that continue to operate
even when one or more disk drives fail. Multiple
controllers and power supplies provide protection. The
use of multiple fibre channel switches creates a fabric of
connectivity.
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
12


The leading suppliers of NAS storage are Network
Appliance and EMC Corporation. A number of other
vendors including Auspex Systems Inc.; Compaq
Computer Corporation; Dell; Hewlett-Packard; IBM;
Maxtor Corporation; Network Storage Solutions;
Procom Technology, Inc.; and Snap Appliances.
The leading suppliers of SAN are EMC Corporation
, Hitachi Data Systems, IBM, Sun Microsystems,
Hewlett Packard, Dell Computer Corporation, and
Compaq Computer Corporation.
10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
13
Technology Alternatives
Storage over IP (SoIP), also known as iSCSI
(Internet SCSI), is a technology that has emerged
in the last year that relies on Ethernet and IP
network protocols to create a storage network
rather than Fiber Channel technologies on which
current SANs are based.

10/2010
Palestinian Land Authority IT Department
By Nahreen Ameen
14