Transcript Slides I1

Session # I1
Chronic Pain: How Can WE
Stop the Suffering?
Meghan Fondow, PhD
Ashley Grosshans, LCSW
Elizabeth Zeidler Schreiter, PsyD
Chantelle Thomas, PhD
Kevin Fehr, MD
CFHA 18th Annual Conference
October 13-15, 2016  Charlotte, NC U.S.A.
Faculty Disclosure
The presenters of this session have NOT had
any relevant financial relationships during
the past 12 months.
Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of this session, the participant will
be able to:
• Describe key steps in implementing a clinic wide
shift in chronic pain management initiates
• Discuss consistency in EHR documentation,
deriving opiate pain management registry,
systematization of UDS, and opiate medication
refill management protocol
• Explore how multi-disciplinary team meetings have
been instrumental in shifting provider attitudes,
treatment planning, and prescribing patterns while
facilitating reciprocal cross discipline education
through a collaborative, supportive work group
Bibliography / Reference
Sherman, Richard (2011), PAIN: Assessment & Intervention From A Psychological Perspective,
Second Edition
Dowell, D., Haegerich, T. M., & Chou, R. (2016). CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for
chronic pain—United States, 2016. JAMA, 315(15), 1624-1645.
Salvetti, M. D. G., Cobelo, A., Vernalha, P. D. M., Vianna, C. I. D. A., Canarezi, L. C. C. C. C., &
Calegare, R. G. L. (2012). Effects of a psychoeducational program for chronic pain
management. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem, 20(5), 896-902.
http://www.iasppain.org/files/Content/NavigationMenu/EducationalResources/IASP_ Wait_ Times.pdf
Jones, T., Lookatch, S., & Moore, T. (2013). Effects of a Single Session Group Intervention for
Pain Management in Chronic Pain Patients: A Pilot Study. Pain and therapy, 2(1), 57-64.
Chronic Pain Overview
Pain is considered chronic when it is continuous or recurrent and lasts
more than three months.
Chronic pain has a negative impact on an individual’s quality of life,
affecting sleep, diet, relationships, ability to work and functionality,
among other aspects of daily life (Salvetti et al 2012)
Chronic Pain Overview
Major public health problem
US prevalence: 11.2% (Dowell et al 2016)
◦ Opioids have serious risks: from 1999 to 2014 more than 165,000
overdose deaths from pain medications
◦ PCPs report concerns about misuse, stress managing chronic pain
populations, not enough training
Access Community Health Centers
Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) in which patients receive a
wide array of services in one clinic location (medical, dental, behavioral
health, pharmacy, community resources)
More than 26,000 people call Access their health care home
3 primary care clinic locations in Madison, WI all certified as Patient
Centered Medical Homes
Over 5800 BHC visits
in 2015
1 in 5 patients met
with BHC in 2015
Access and Chronic Pain
Started in 2009
◦ Consisted of BHC Champion and Medical Provider Champion
◦ Series of provider meetings exploring their needs surrounding
chronic pain management (1 year)
◦ Identified systemic issues
◦ Identified issues with provider comfort
Recognized need for cultural shift in what it means to “treat” chronic
pain
What didn’t work
Providers compelling BHC involvement
◦ Tasked with teaching “coping” to unwilling patients
◦ Narcotics contingent on meeting with BHC
BHC handoffs
◦ How BHC introduced to patient for chronic pain
◦ “You think it is all in my head”
◦ How BHC involved in conversations regarding narcotics
◦ BHC as messenger that narcotics not prescribed
Provider Education
Series of videos were created to:
⦿ provide language for challenging discussions
⦿ gave framework for appropriate referrals
⦿ education regarding non-medication treatment options
What didn’t work: Provider
Education
Placed demands on providers outside of normal work
schedule
Facilitated an isolated learning experience
Do not allow for collegial sharing of the burden
What did work
Monthly chronic pain team peer review meetings
◦ Forum for discussing challenging patient presentations
◦ Open to all staff including nurses and support staff
◦ Team review of prescription regimen and brainstorming for
treatment options
◦ Provided another forum for clarifying best practices
surrounding various pain conditions
◦ Protected time to ensure that all aspects of patient care
related to pain are being prioritized
What did work
Strong leadership from CMO and BHC
Increased systems change
Consistent documentation
Routine urine drug screens
Ongoing discussions with providers on “compassionate no”
Exposing shared struggle amongst providers (decreased
shame/guilt)
◦ Monitoring patients at higher doses
◦ Increased exploration of alternate treatment methods and
diagnostic testing
◦
◦
◦
◦
Other BHC Impacts
Support and collaboration with PCP colleagues for debriefing
before/after challenging patient interactions
Support in developing language to communicate plan of care
when including the “compassionate no” in regards to opioid
prescribing
Supporting providers in developing curiosity in patient
understanding of their pain diagnosis, impacts on daily
functioning, and safety concerns
Chronic Pain Groups
Pilot Summer 2016
Collaboration between medical provider and BHC
Group medical visit
Goal: non-medical options for managing chronic pain
Topics include understanding pain, sleep, stress, nutrition,
communication
Outcomes
Consistency in documentation processes by providers
◦ > 85% patients with chronic pain dx
◦ > 66% patients on registry with standardized
documentation
Urine Drug Screens
◦ 65% in past 6 months (increase from 20% in 2014)
Rates of narcotics prescribing similar, but doses declined
Future Directions
Plans to expand services to include universal substance
abuse and depression screening
SBIRT
Consideration of on-site fully integrated physical therapy
Questions?
Session Evaluation
Please complete and return the evaluation form
before leaving this session.
Thank you!