Complications of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Download
Report
Transcript Complications of Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices
Cheryl A. Abbas, PharmD
Clinical Pharmacist
Advanced Heart Failure and Heart Transplant
Thomas Jefferson University Hospital
Review the physiological effects of a continuous-flow
left-ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD)
Understand the role of pharmacotherapy in the
management of CF-LVADs
Evaluate clinical symptoms and device findings in the
diagnosis of CF-LVAD complications
Describe the pharmacotherapy of device-related
complications
Progression of heart failure leads to refractory
treatments
~250,000 of 7 million patients will develop advanced
disease
Inotropic support survival rate of 10-30% at 1 year
Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted
Circulatory Support (INTERMACS)
Fifth annual report: 7,000 patients in the United States
Increase in implanting centers from ~109 to ~147 in
January 2011 to 2012
Chetan PB. J Heart Lung Transplant 2014;33:667-674.
Implanted pump delivering blood from left ventricle to
ascending aorta
Flow rate up to 10 liters per minute
Mean pressure of 100 mm HG
Continuous flow vs. pulsatile devices
Greater durability
Reduced size and weight
Silent operation
Improved quality of life
BTT = Bridge to Transplant
DT = Destination Therapy
Slaughter, MS. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010;29:S1-S39.
Patient assessment:
Appropriateness based on degree of illness
Heart Failure Survival Score; Seattle Heart Failure Score
Ability to undergo operative procedure
Adequate family/caregiver support for long-term success
Slaughter, MS. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010;29:S1-S39.
Rotary blood pump
Percutaneous driveline
to external controller
External batteries or
power-based unit
Estimated lifespan of
pump: 5-10 years
Slaughter, MS. N Engl J Med 2009;361:2241-51.
Speed: Fixed in range of 8,000 – 12,000 RPMs
Power: Direct measure of voltage to motor (4-7 watts)
Flow: Estimated speed x power (3-7 liters/minute)
Afterload sensitive - affected by hypertension
↑AO → ↓ Flow
↓AO → ↑ Flow
Pulsatility Index (PI): Flow pulse through pump (4-8)
Native LV contractility and volume status
Thoratec Press Kit: HMII Pivitol Trial Fact Sheet.
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Hemodynamic effect of CF-LVAD: Increase in diastolic
pressure and flow
Reduced pulse pressure
Difficult to palpate pulse
Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) measured by doppler
Goal MAP: 70-80 mmHG
Amount of cardiac output by CF-LVAD affected by
afterload
Maintaining goal = optimized cardiac output
Reduces stroke due to hypertension
Blood Pressure Management
Vasoactive agents
ACEi/ARB, β-blockade, hydralazine, nitrates
Hypertension: assess BP and volume status
CF-LVAD parameters
Decrease in pump flow and power
Increase in PI
Management: Decrease afterload with medications
Consider diuretics for volume overload
Hypotension: symptoms, BP monitoring
CF-LVAD parameters
Increase in pump flow and power
Decrease in PI
Management: Adjust vasoactive agents
Intravascular fluid volume management
Slaughter, MS. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010;29:S1-S39.
Required to avoid thrombotic complications
Early BTT HeartMate II trials included aggressive
anticoagulation (AC)
Target INR range 2.5 to 3.5
Incidence of thrombosis < bleeding resulted in reduced AC
therapy
ISHLT MCS Guidelines
Anticoagulation: Warfarin with target INR based upon
manufacturer
HeartMate II: 2.0 to 3.0
Antiplatelet: Aspirin 81-325 mg daily in addition to warfarin
Additional agents may be added
Feldman, D. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013;32:157-187.
Boyle, et al evaluated long term AC therapy in 331
HeartMate II outpatients
Risk of thrombosis increased with INR < 1.5
Risk of hemorrhagic events present at all INR ranges;
increased with INRs > 2.5
Slaughter, MS. J Heart Lung Transplant 2010;29:S1-S39.
Increased platelet activation from sheer stress
Agents:
Aspirin 81-325 mg daily
Clopidogrel 7g mg daily
Dipyridamole 75 mg tid
Pentoxifylline 400 mg tid
Lack of data: Ticagrelor and Prasugrel
Hypo- or non-responsiveness is commonly seen
Doubling of dose
RW is a 63 y/o M PMH DM, HL, dilated NICM s/p
LVAD placement (HMII) in 2014. He presents to
clinic, where the LVAD coordinator obtains a doppler
BP of 130 mmHG. When interrogating the device,
what LVAD parameters may be found?
A. Decreased PI
B. Increased power
C. Decreased flow
D. None of the above
Development of clot within the flow path or any/all
components
Leads to pump failure
Uncommon complication
ADVANCE trial 6.4% risk
HMII up to 6.25% risk
Pump-related risk factors:
Inflow cannula malposition
Outflow graft kink/compression
Low flows from low speeds or right-sided dysfunction
Goldstein DJ, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013; 32:667–670.
http://ejcts.oxfordjournals.org/content/39/3/414/F1.expansion.
Patient-related risk factors:
Atrial fibrillation
Pre-existent LV thrombus
Prosthetic mechanical valve
Sepsis
Sub-therapeutic INR
Inadequate anti-platelet therapy
Pro-coagulant states
Hemolysis is a result of shear stress!
Routine diagnosis of hemolysis
Plasma Free Hemoglobin (pfHb) > 40 mg/dL
Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) > 3x ULN
Haptoglobin < 10 mg/dL
Dark red (tea-colored) urine
Power elevations (>10 watts)
Imaging
Chest x-ray and CT: malposition
Echocardiogram: suboptimal LV unloading
Right-heart catheterization: elevated pressures
Goldstein DJ, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013; 32:667–670.
Surgical: VAD exchange
Significant morbidity
Pharmacology
GPIIbIIIa inhibitors
Thrombolytics
Intraventricular vs peripheral administration
Modify antithrombotic therapy
Increase aspirin dose (81 to 325 mg daily)
Increase goal INR
Add antiplatelet agent (clopidogrel, dipyridamole)
Goldstein DJ, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013; 32:667–670.
• Retrospective review; single center, Jan 2006-Nov 2012
• Evidence of hemolysis + high clinical suspicion of VAD
thrombosis, n=33 (of 217, 15.2%)
• Mortality: 15/33, 45.5%
• Treatment: (7 deaths)
– Eptifibatide, n=9
– tPA, n=5
– Both, n=10
• No treatment, n=9 (5 pump exchanges, 4 deaths)
• High mortality rate with and without pharmacologic
treatment
Lenneman AJ, et al. J Heart Lunt Translant 2013; 32:S186-187.
CW is a 56 y/o F w/ICM s/p LVAD (HMII) who
presented to the hospital from LVAD clinic with an
increase in LDH to 764 (baseline 295) and persistent
elevations in power >10 watts
PMH: CAD, sCHF with BiV ICD, COPD, DM
CW was started on IV heparin upon admission, and
resumed her outpatient warfarin (goal INR 2-2.5) and
aspirin 325mg qday
Which of the following agents could be added to her
anticoagulation regimen?
A. Cilostazol 100mg po bid
B. Clopidogrel 75mg po qday
C. Dipyridamole 75mg po tid
D. B or C
E. None of the above
Most common adverse event after HMII
Incidence: 17-31%
Frequent and prolonged hospitalizations
Gastrointestinal angiodysplasia (GIAD)
Most common cause of GIB: 15-31% of total
Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs)
Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE)
Retrospective, single-center review of 172 patients
19% (32/172) rate of GIB
AVMs: 31% (10/32)
Bunte MC, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:2188-96.
Draper K, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015;34(1):132-4.
Narrow pulse pressure: ↓ intraluminal pressure
Vascular dilatation angiodysplasia, AVMs
Hypoperfusion intestinal mucosa ischemia
Over-expression of angiogenic growth factors
Acquired Von Willebrand Disease
Increased shear stress, turbulence, and high velocities
Von Willebrand factor cleavage increased bleeding
and decreased platelet-mediated hemostasis
GIB: Patient Presentation
Decrease in hemoglobin (Hgb)
Obtain coagulation panel (PT/PTT/INR)
Symptoms: symptomatic anemia
Fatigue, dizziness, dyspnea on exertion
Melena
Hypotension (decreased MAP)
Adjust vasoactive medications
Decrease in PI
Consider volume expansion
Treatment Options
Blood transfusions to target Hgb
Problematic for patients listed for transplant
Addition of proton pump inhibitor
Prophylaxis vs. treatment
Colonoscopy +/- endoscopy: suspected bleeding sites
Endoscopic ablation of AVMs
Mechanical clipping
Cauterization
Argon plasma coagulation (APC)
Surgical resection
Ray R, et al. ASAIO Journal 2014;60:482-483.
Modification of Current Therapy
Cessation of anticoagulation
Hold warfarin in setting of clinically significant bleed
Assess need for IV heparin when INR < goal
Reduction of anticoagulation
Decrease goal INR
Modify or discontinue antiplatelet therapy
Reduction of CF-LVAD speed
Increase pulse pressure reduce shear stress
Additional Therapies
Anticoagulation protocols
Reductions in response to bleeding
Octreotide
Difficult to tolerate: mode of delivery (injection)
Adverse effects: nausea and bradycardia
Thalidomide: potent anti-angiogenic compount
Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)
Recurrent GIAD-related bleeding
Associated thrombosis
REMS program
Lenalidomide: synthetic analog of thalidomide
Less non-hematologic adverse effects
Draper K, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant 2015;34(1):132-4.
Preventative Strategies?
Additional studies needed:
Blood product use
Platelet aggregometry
Thromboelastography
Use is currently insufficient to make recommendations
Perioperative bleeding risk stratification
Individualized bleeding score
Could offer tailored post-operative AC to limit bleeding
Balancing Act: GIB vs. Thrombus
JH is a 67 y/o M w/ICM s/p DT LVAD (HMII) implant
in May 2015, p/w 2 episodes of melena overnight,
dizziness, and fatigue. MAP on admission is 55
mmHG. LVAD interrogation shows multiple PI events
(decreased).
Labs on admission:
Hgb 7.5 mg/dL (baseline 10.0 mg/dL)
INR 3.3 (goal INR 2-2.5)
Current medications:
Amiodarone 200 mg po qday, aspirin 325 mg po qday,
carvedilol 12.5 mg po bid, furosemide 20 mg po qday,
pantoprazole 40 mg po qday, potassium chloride 20 mEq po
qday, warfarin 5 mg po qday
JH was transfused 2 units of PRBC and
Gastroenterology was consulted with plan for
colonoscopy for ? lower GIB. In addition to holding
warfarin, what other medication adjustments would
you make at this time?
A. Discontinue furosemide 20 mg po qday
B. Discontinue carvedilol 25 mg po bid
C. Lower aspirin to 81 mg po qday
D. All of the above
Epidemiology
CF-LVADs decreased rate of infection by 50%
Goldstein, et al. INTERMACS registry:
2008-2013 implants; n = 9,372
2nd most common cause of death post 6-month survival
Most common:
Sepsis = 23%
Pneumonia = 20%
Percutaneous site/driveline infection (PSI) = 19%
Causative organisms
Staphylococcus species
Pseudomonas species
Prominent w/longer VAD support
Difficult to eradicate
Goldstein DJ, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant 2012;31(11):1151-7.
Complications of Infection
Association with cerebrovascular events (CVEs)
Persistence of bacteremia > 72 hours
Persistent Pseudomonas aeruginosa blood stream
infections 7-fold increase in CVEs
Mycotic aneurysms
Potential mechanisms of CVEs:
Platelet activation
Alterations in endothelial function
Systemic inflammation
Bacterial seeding of cerebral vasculature
Aggarwal A, et al. ASAIO J 2012;94(5):1381-6.
Pathophysiology
Disruption or trauma to the barrier between skin and
driveline
Formation of biofilm
Increase difficulty to eradicate bacteria
Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas
Peri-operatively and post-operatively
Average time to occurrence of PSI = ~6 months
PSI locations
May remain superficial
Spread along driveline path, into pocket or pump
Deepen within abdominal wall to form abscess
Trachtenberg B, et al. MDCVJ 2015;11(1):28-32.
Classification of Infection
CVC: central venous
catheter
BSI: blood stream
infection
SSI: surgical site
infection
Trachtenberg B, et al. MDCVJ 2015;11(1):28-32.
Prevention
Immobilization of percutaneous lead at exit site
Prevents disruption of subcutaneous tissue growth
Methods: minimize trauma and tension
Anchoring devices
Stabilization belts
Exercise sterile vs. clean technique for exit site care
Patient education
Report increased drainage or erythema immediately
Gentle and non-traumatic exit site cleaning
Prevention: Perioperative Antibiotics
REMATCH study (HeartMate XVE):
Vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV 1 hour pre-op then q12h
Levofloxacin 500 mg IV 1 hour pre-op then q24h
Rifampin 600 mg po 1 hour pre-op then q24h
Fluconazole 200 mg IV 2 hours pre-op then q24h
Most centers omit rifampin, use β-lactams, or tailor to
institutional antibiogram
Continue for 48-hours
HeartWare recommendations:
Cover S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and Enterococcus according
to institutional antibiogram
Richenbacher WE, et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;75:S86-92.
Diagnosis
Prompt culture of drainage
3 sets of blood cultures
Imaging
Chest radiography
Echocardiogram: pacemakers or defibrillator leads
Presence of valvular endocarditis or device infections
Ultrasound or CT:
Diagnose collections of fluid around driveline, pump, or
pump pocket
Guide aspiration or debridement
Feldman D, et al. J Heart Lung Transplant 2013;32(2):157-87.
Diagnosis
Treatment Options
Hospitalization criteria:
Signs of systemic infection = fever or leukocytosis
Mild infection:
Increase frequency of dressing changes
Review dressing change protocols for compliance
Moderate infection:
Tailor antibiotic therapy
Local debridement
Weekly clinic visits
Severe infection: purulent drainage and subcutaneous induration
Target antimicrobial therapy with ID consult
Imaging tests
Surgical interventions: debridement or retunneling of driveline
Trachtenberg B, et al. MDCVJ 2015;11(1):28-32.
Treatment Options
Additional tools
Wound vacuum-assisted closure therapy
Antimicrobial beads
Chronic suppressive oral antibiotics
For recurrent VAD-specific or VAD-related infections
1/3 of patients have recurrence despite antibiotics
Device exchange (severe cases)
Expediting heart transplant listing
Studies show no increase in mortality post-transplant
Overview: CF-LVAD Complications
Newer devices improvements in survival
Every VAD patient is different!
Importance of understanding VAD-specific parameters
Balancing act between VAD thrombus and GIB
Preventative measures of infection
Need more data
Publish your experience!!!