Evidence Based Approach To Falls 2008

Download Report

Transcript Evidence Based Approach To Falls 2008

Evidence Based
Approach To Falls
Dr Larry Dian
Division Of Geriatric Medicine
U.B.C.
Evidence Based
Approach
This page is intentionally left blank
Epidemiology
 Falls are common; 50% for those 80
years and older fall yearly
 60 % of those with a history of a fall in
the previous year will have a subsequent
fall
 Most falls result in an injury of some type
 10% major injury, 5 % lead to
hospitalization, >70% fear of falling
Scenario 1
 You receive a call from the emergency
physician regarding your 86 year old
patient who is being sent home after
receiving sutures for a scalp laceration
that occurred after a fall. CT head
“normal”.
Acute Fall
Why did the person Fall?
5 Step Assessment
 Question 1: Did the fall result as a loss
of consciousness?
If yes: Sz. or Stokes- Adams
attack
EEG, 24 hour holter, echocardiogram
Micro burst of LOC likely not significant
Confusion or drowsiness after fall
somewhat supportive
Collateral history very helpful
If No Loss of Consciousness
 Was Fall preceded by dizziness?
Type 1: VertigoCentral/peripheral
BPV commonest
Type 2
Lightheadedness/ transient cerebral
hypo-perfusion/orthostatic hypotension
Type 3: “Dizziness of legs”/unsteadiness
Type 4: De-afferentation /psychological
If No Dizziness
 Was the fall associated with an acute
medical illness?
Atypical presentation
Delirium
“Round up all the usual suspects”
If No Acute Illness
 What was the mechanism of the fall?
Be as precise as possible recreating
actions before and after the fall
Avoid leading questions; patients
may not remember
Collateral history very useful
If No Mechanism For Fall
 Falls are either multi-factorial or lower
limb weakness
 “Just Fall” fall –eccentric weakness of
quadriceps muscle
5 Step Algorhythm
 Provides a rational strategy for
mechanistic determination of the fall
 Provides a strategy for fall risk reduction
Scenario 2
 The family of your 89 year old patient
wants your opinion about moving their
reluctant mother in a nursing home
because of the concern that she might
fall and “hurt herself”
Risk Factors
 Past history of a fall
 Psychotropic drug
use
 Lower extremity
 Arthritis
weakness
 History of stroke
 Age
 Orthostatic
 Female gender
hypotension
 Cognitive impairment
 Dizziness
 Balance problems
 Anemia
Chronic Diseases
 Parkinson's disease
 Osteoarthritis of the knee, feet ankle
 Cognitive impairment (mmse 18-23) 2x
increased risk of falls
 Risk increases with increasing number of
chronic diseases
 Number and type of medications
 Alcohol use
Targeted Physical Exam
 Cardiovascular system
 Central nervous system
 Musculoskeletal system; lower limbs
Targeted Physical Exam
 Postural blood pressure
 Heart failure, Atrial fib, Aortic stenosis
 Mental status, Parkinson’s disease, stroke
peripheral neuropathy, visual acuity
 Arthritis of knees feet, podiatric problems
 Strength of hip flexors, ankle dorsi-flexors
 Environmental factors, footwear, mobility aids
Supplemental Tests
 Get Up and Go Test
 Functional reach test
 Sternal nudge test; unipedal and tandem stance
Get Up and Go Test
 Have the patient sit in a straight-backed
high-seat chair
 Instructions for patient: Get up (without
use of armrests, if possible)
 Stand still momentarily
 Walk forward 10 ft (3 m)
 Turn around and walk back to chair
 Turn and be seated
Get Up and Go Test
Factors to note:
 Sitting balance
 Transfers from sitting to standing
 Pace and stability of walking
 Ability to turn without staggering
Diagram of functional reach test to
assess balance in elderly persons
e-mail this to a colleague
Therapy
 Address medical issues
 Review home environment
 Provide appropriate walking aid
 Gait and balance exercise training
 Falls are not random events
 Falls are common and are associated
with significant morbidity and mortality
 Standardized assessment tools exist
 A coherent mechanism can be
developed in most cases
 Consider referral to falls clinic in complex
cases