Adverse Drug Reactions & Older Adults with Dr. Patricia Keys
Download
Report
Transcript Adverse Drug Reactions & Older Adults with Dr. Patricia Keys
Patricia A. Keys, Pharm.D., C.G.P.
Clinical Associate Professor
Mylan School of Pharmacy
Duquesne University
Adverse Drug Event (ADE)- untoward and
unintended events rising from the use or misuse
of medication 1.
Potentially Inappropriate Medication(PIM)-a
drug for which the risk of an adverse event
outweighs the clinical benefit, particularly when
there is evidence in favor of a safer or more
effective alternative therapy for the same
condition 2.
1.Morandi et al.2011
2. Laroche et al. 2009
*Type A- Probable and predictable based on
the drugs pharmacologic profile. Includes
dose-related events. Ex. Insulin and
hypoglycemia
Type B-unpredictable and unanticipated
(ideosyncratic). Ex. Vioxx and C-V events
Allergic- immune-mediated reaction
3. Wooten 2010.
The science of ADR’s
Incorporates detection, assessment,
understanding and prevention of adverse
effects, particularly long-term and short-term
side effects of medicines.
Prospective consideration and rapid
recognition are key to reducing serious
adverse events.
3. Wooten 2010.
ADE’s are the most common cause of preventable
non-surgical adverse events in medicine.
ADE’s are the 4th -6th leading cause of death in the
U.S.
3-24% of hospital admissions are due to ADE’s
30% of inpatients experience an ADE as an
unexpected complication of treatment.5
More than 180,000 severe or fatal ADE’s occur in the
elderly in the outpatient setting each year; ½ are
preventable. 4
4. Avorn and Shrank 2008.
5. Hohl et. al 2011
ADE’s on average increase length of hospital
stay an average of 1.9-2.2 days.
Attributable cost (2008) per event estimated
at $3034-$4352.
Extrapolated national inpatient costs
estimated at $2.2- 5.6 billion annually (2008)
based on 1.5 million hospital days.
5. Hohl et al 2011
Absence of “frail elderly” in controlled trials=
“therapeutic orphans”.
Health care providers’ formal
education/training in geriatrics is often
limited
Stereotypes of aging– “missing the target”
Polypharmacy- multiple doctors, multiple
drugs= increased statistical probability.
Altered pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in
aging
Altered cognition- adherence problems
Sensory disabilities- vision, hearing, coordination
Social isolation in the community- caregiver support
Deliberate non-adherence- fears, finances, friends.
(half of all drugs prescribed are not taken!!!!!!)
Interactions with OTC/herbal products
One pharmacy, one pharmacist
Shared decision -making for optimal
adherence
Caregiver support/education
Avoid mail order
Assistive devices -cell phone alarms, apps
Pill containers/labeling
Reassess patient’s medication regimen at
least twice yearly
Individualized medication education-MTM
Fragmented health care/record keeping
Transitions in care
Managed care- limited options for extended
care for poor without a skilled need.
Prospective reimbursement
Volume of patients/ orders/ drugs- nursing,
pharmacies, physicians
1.Identify PIM’s and patient factors
2.Communicate to effect change
Criteria based- Beer’s List 6, STOPP-START
criteria7
Data driven- Based on frequency of
significant problems seen, identify highest
risk offending drugs and target prevention
strategies there
6. Beers List Panel of Experts 2012
7. Gallagher et al 2011
Explicit criteria- identify high-risk drugs
using a list of PIM’s identified and reviewed
by a panel of experts as having an
unfavorable risk: benefit profile considering
alternative treatments available
Implicit criteria- understood; identify high
risk drugs on the basis of a single trained
evaluator’s experience, on a per patient basis.
6. Beers List Expert Panel 2012
Third revision
Partnership with the American Geriatrics Society.
Expert Consensus Panel- Geriatricians,
pharmacists, nurses.
Categorize PIMs into two categories- medications
to avoid in all individuals age 65 and older; and
medications considered inappropriate when used
by older adults with certain diseases or
syndromes.
Applicable to patients in any setting
6. Beers List Expert Panel 2012
STOPP= Screening Tool of Older Persons
Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (drugdrug, drug –disease interactions resulting in
potential toxicity)
START= Screening Tool to Alert to Right
Treatment (common prescribing omissions).
7. Beers List Expert Panel
National Electronic Injury Surveillance SystemCooperative ADE Surveillance Project 2007-2009
2/3 of ADR’s presenting in elderly ER patients
that resulted in hospital admission were due to
four drug classes, alone or in combination:
Warfarin 33.3%,Insulins 13.9%,oral antiplatelet
agents 13.3%,oral hypoglycemics 10.7%.
Other “high risk” drugs ave. 1.2%
Advocates targeted intervention
8. Budnitz et al. 2007.
Anticoagulants- bleeding/thrombosis
Antibiotics- c diff diarrhea, antimicrobial
resistance, toxicity
Antiarrhythmics (esp. digoxin)- toxicity
Anticonvulsants- toxicity
Premise: Close monitoring reduces ADE’s and
contains unnecessary costs
ADVANTAGES
Greatest “bang for the
buck”- screen LARGE #’s of
patients
Provides potentially
immediate feedback to
prescribers either when the
order is written, or
Allows orders to be
changed by pharmacists
per protocol upon review
or prior to dispensing.
DISADVANTAGES/
Expense of
purchasing/developing
software
Software options require
EMR/ CPOE
“Alert fatigue”
Only as good as the people
who write the program
Continuous quality
improvement- time and
$$$ (educate and train)
QUESTION: WHO SHOULD DO IT AND HOW
SHOULD IT BE DONE
? Clinically trained Pharmacists- targeted
evaluation, multidisciplinary teams
?Physicians- consults by geriatricians, peer
review prescribing
?****Systems
Electronic Medical Record (EMR)- access to
full chart (labs, physical assessment)
Electronic Prescribing (CPOE)- computerized
gero-focused informatics/decision support
Protocols (approved by Pharmacy and
Therapeutics Committees) for changing
orders to prevent problems.
“Once recognized, a side effect of a drug is
probably the single most reversible affliction
in all of geriatric medicine”.3
“Any new symptom in an older patient must be
considered to be a possible drug side effect
until proven otherwise.” 4
“Statistics are only true if it happens to the
other guy; if it happens to me- it’s 100%”3
4Avorn and Shrank 2008.
3 Wooten. 2010
1. Morandi A, Vasilevskis EE, Pandharipande PP, et al. Inappropriate medications in elderly
ICU survivors: Where to intervene? Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(11):1032-1034.
2. Laroche ML, Charmes JP, Bouthier F, Merle L. Inappropriate medications in the elderly.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;85(1):94-97..
3. Wooten JM. Adverse drug reactions: Part I. South Med J. 2010;103(10):1025-8; quiz
1029.
4. Avorn J, Shrank WH. Adverse drug reactions in elderly people: A substantial cause of
preventable illness. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):956-957.
5. Hohl CM, Nosyk B, Kuramoto L, et al. Outcomes of emergency department patients
presenting with adverse drug events. Ann Emerg Med. 2011;58(3):270-279.e4.
6. American Geriatrics Society 2012 Beers Criteria Update Expert Panel. American
Geriatrics Society Updated Beer’s Criteria for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in
Older Adults. J AmerGerSoc 2012;1-16.
7. Gallagher PF, O’Connor MN, O’Mahoney D. Prevention of potentially inappropriate
prescribing for elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial using STOPP/START criteria.
Clin Pharmacol Ther 2011;89(6); 845-854.
8. Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for
adverse drug events in older americans. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):2002-2012.