Treatment Options for First Trimester Loss
Download
Report
Transcript Treatment Options for First Trimester Loss
Management of Early
Pregnancy Loss (EPL)
Sarah Prager, MD, MAS
Department of ob/gyn
University of Washington
Outline
Background information
Expectant management
Medical management
Methotrexate
Misoprostol (+/- mifepristone)
Surgical management
Background
Miscarriage is the most common complication
of early pregnancy.
8-20% clinically recognized pregnancies
13-26% all pregnancies
80% of miscarriages occur in the first trimester
Risk factors
Age
Prior SAb
Smoking
Alcohol
Caffeine (high intake)
Maternal weight
BMI < 18.5 or > 25
Celiac disease (untreated)
Alcohol
Cocaine
NSAIDs
High gravidity
Fever
Low folate levels
Etiology
33% anembryonic
50% due to chromosomal abnormalities
Host factors
Autosomal trisomies 52%
Monosomy X 19%
Polyploidies 22%
Other 7%
Structural abnormalities
Maternal infection/endocrinopathy/coagulopathy
Unexplained
Clinical presentation
Bleeding
Pain/cramping
Falling or abnormally rising BhCG
Ultrasound findings:
Absent fetal cardiac activity with CRL > 5 mm
Absent fetal pole if mean sac diameter > 25 mm (TA) or 18
mm (TV)
No/abnormal yolk sac (95% PPV)
No/abnormal fetal heart rate
Small sac size
Subchorionic hematoma
Management options
Expectant management
Medical management
Surgical management
Sotiriadis A, Obstet Gynecol 2005; Nanda K, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006
Expectant management
Requirements for therapy:
Less than 13 weeks gestation
Stable vital signs
No evidence of infection
What to expect:
Most expulsions occur in the first 2 weeks after diagnosis
Prolonged follow-up may be needed
Acceptable and safe to wait up to 4 weeks post-diagnosis
Outcomes
Overall success rate of 81%
Success rates vary by type of miscarriage
91% for incomplete/inevitable abortion
76% with missed abortion
66% with anembryonic pregnancies
Luise C, Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002
What is success?
≤15 mm endometrial thickness (ET)
3 days to 6 weeks after diagnosis
No vaginal bleeding
Negative urine hCG
Problems with ET measurements
No clear rationale for this cut off
In a study of 80 women with successful medical
abortion:
Mean ET at 24 hours 17.5 mm (7.6 – 29 mm)
At one week: 15% with ET > 16 mm
Study of medical management after miscarriage:
86% success rate if use absence of gestational sac
51% success rate if use ET ≤15 mm
Harwood B, Contraception 2001; Reynolds A, Eur. J Obstet Gynecol Reproduct. Biol 2005
When to intervene
Vaginal bleeding and pos. UPT can continue for
2-4 weeks, so not good measures of success
Continued gestational sac
Clinical symptoms
Patient preference
Time (?)
Medical management
Misoprostol
Mifepristone plus Misoprostol
Methotrexate plus Misoprostol
There is no medical regimen for management of
early pregnancy loss that is FDA approved.
Medical management
Requirements for therapy:
Less than 13 weeks gestation
Stable vital signs
No evidence of infection
*No allergies to medications used
Misoprostol
Prostoglandin E1 analogue
FDA approved for prevention of gastric ulcers
Used off-label for many ob/gyn indications
Labor induction
Cervical ripening
Medical abortion (with mifepristone)
Prevention/treatment of post-partum hemorrhage
Can be administered by oral, buccal, sublingual,
vaginal and rectal routes
Chen B, Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007
Why misoprostol?
Do something while still avoiding surgery
Cost effective
Few side effects (especially with vaginal)
Stable at room temperature
Readily available
Dosing Regimens
Creinin: 400 mcg po vs 800 pv 25% vs. 88%
Ngoc: 800 mcg po vs 800 pv: 89% vs. 93% (NS)
Tang: 600 mcg SL vs 600 pv q 3 hrs x 3 doses: 87.5%
Phupong: 600 mcg po x 1 vs. q 4 hrs x 2 doses: 82% vs
92% (NS)
SL had more side effects (diarrhea 70% vs 27.5%)
Repeat dosing increased diarrhea (40% vs 18%)
Gilles: 800 mcg pv saline-moistened vs. dry: 83% vs
87% (NS)
Creinin MD, Obstet Gynecol 1997; Ngoc NTN, Int.J Gynaecol Obstet 2004; Tang OS, Hum Reproduct 2003; Phupong V,
Contraception 2005; Gilles JM, Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004
Outcomes
Single dose 400 – 800 mcg misoprostol
Repeat dose x 1 if incomplete at 24 hours
80 – 88% success rate
Placebo success rates:
25 – 88% success rate
16 – 60%
Success rate depends on type of miscarriage:
100% with incomplete abortion
87% for all others
Wood SL, Obstet Gynecol 2002; Bagratee JS, Hum Reproduct 2004; Blohm F, BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol 2005
Side effects and complications
Misoprostol vs. placebo:
Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea: no difference
Pain: more pain and analgesics in one study
Hemoglobin concentration: no difference
Infection: 0 for placebo vs. 2 - 4.7% for misoprostol
No benefit with repeat dosing within 3-4 hrs.
Improved outcome with one repeat dose at 24 hrs. if
incomplete
90% found medical management acceptable and would
elect same treatment again
Wood SL, Obstet Gynecol 2002; Bagratee JS, Hum Reproduct 2004; Blohm F, BJOG: Int J Obstet Gynecol 2005
Misoprostol bottom line
800 mcg. per vagina (or buccal)
Repeat x 1 at 12-24 hours if incomplete
Measure success as with expectant management
Intervene with surgical management if:
Continued gestational sac
Clinical symptoms
Patient preference
Time (?)
Mifepristone and misoprostol
Mifepristone: progestin antagonist that binds to
progestin receptor
Success rates for mifepristone and misoprostol in EPL:
Used with elective medical abortion to “destabilize” the
implantation site
Current evidence-based regimen: 200 mg Mifepristone and
800 mcg misoprostol
52 – 84% (observational trials using non-standard dosing)
90 – 93% ( with standard dosing)
No direct comparison b/w misoprostol alone and
mifepristone/misoprostol with standard dosing
Mifepristone may help, data still pending
Gronlund A, Acta Obstet Gynaecol 1998; Nielsen S, Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997;
Niinimaki M, Fertility Sterility 2006; Schreiber CA, Contraception 2006
Methotrexate and misoprostol
Methotrexate: folic acid antagonist
Used in medical management for ectopic
pregnancy
Introduced in 1993 in combination with
misoprostol to treat elective abortion medically.
Cytotoxic to the trophoblast
Success rates up to 98% (misoprostol administered
7 days after methotrexate)
No data for use in early pregnancy loss
Creinin MD, Contraception 1993
Surgical management
Suction dilation and curettage (D&C)
Who should have surgical management?
Unstable
Significant medical morbidity
Infected
Very heavy bleeding
Anyone who wants immediate therapy
Surgical Management
Benefits:
Convenient timing
Observed therapy
High success rates: (93 – 100%)
Risks:
Infection (1/200)
Perforation (1/2000)
Cervical trauma
Uterine synechiae (very rare)
Infection prophylaxis
Periabortal antibiotics reduce infection risk 42%
No strong evidence on what to use
Doxycycline
2 -14 doses
Metronidazole
Bacterial vaginosis
Trichomoniasis
Suspicious discharge
Sawaya GF, Obstet Gynecol 1996; Prieto JA, Obstet Gynecol 1995
Where to perform?
Canada:
92.5% women with SAb presenting to hospital have
D&C
51% women with SAb presenting to family physician
have D&C
Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) in outpatient
setting can decrease hospital costs by 41%
Weibe E, Fam Med 1998; Finer LB, Perspect Sexu Reproduct Health 2003; Blumenthal PD, Int J Gynaecol Obstet 1994
Outcome comparison
Risk of incomplete abortion:
Expectant > surgical
Expectant ≥ medical
Resolution within 48 hours:
surgical>medical>expectant management
Risk of Infection: 2-3%
Expectant = Medical = Surgical
Nanda K, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; Nielsen S, Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1999;
Shelly JM, Aust. NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; Sotiriadis A, Obstet Gynecol 2005; Tinder J, (MIST) BMJ, 2006
Cost analysis
Medical management most cost effective
2 studies
Misoprostol vs. expectant vs. surgical:
1000 vs. 1172 vs. 2007 dollars
Expectant management most cost effective
MIST trial
Expectant vs. medical vs. surgical:
1086 vs. 1410 vs. 1585 pounds
Doyle NM, Obstet. Gynecol 2004; You JH, Hum Reprod 2005; Petrou S, BJOG 2006
Postmiscarriage care
Rhogam at time of diagnosis or surgery
Pelvic rest for 2 weeks
No evidence for delaying conception
Initiate contraception upon completion of procedure
(even IUDs!)
Expect light-moderate bleeding for 2 weeks
Menses return after 6 weeks
Negative BhCG values after 2-4 weeks
Appropriate grief counseling
Goldstein R, Am J Obstet. Gynecol 2002; Wyss P, J Perinat Med 1994;
Grimes D, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000
Future miscarriage risk
Increased risk of miscarriage in future pregnancy
20% after 1 miscarriage.
28% after 2 miscarriages
43% after 3+ miscarriages
Thank You!
Questions?
[email protected]
O: (206) 731-6292
P: (206) 540-6077